You are the one who can't even clarify a statement without dodging around the subject. Fearful coward. I have no idea what you believe. Because you don't say anything with conviction.I'm so cowardly eh
Look at you lot, rounding on someone for saying what you don't agree with.
Hurling insults, patting each other on the back for them
I am here, by myself, speaking about what I believe.
I will allow any objective types reading this to judge who the cowards are
You think HC will stop bombing innocents? Balance your comments fairly please, people will die in the name of profit for certain under HCHmmmmm, a lady that has no doubt engaged in some (potentially) 'questionable' things throughout the course of forty years in public service, or a well-documented liar, cheat, swindler, racist, misogynist, oligarch, rapist, demented sociopath -- TOUGH choice, for sure!
View attachment 3804975
My message is that neither candidate are worthy of trust.Youre a fucking loon. Your message is wing nut assholery, asshole.
My message is nothing
naiveYou think HC will stop bombing innocents? Balance your comments fairly please, people will die in the name of profit for certain under HC
Stop framing every opinion with bias
Thank you, insults aside, you actually asked a valid question.You are the one who can't even clarify a statement without dodging around the subject. Fearful coward. I have no idea what you believe. Because you don't say anything with conviction.
Tell me again how Trump and Clinton are the same. Explain how choosing either is foolish compared to the choice of sitting this one out.
yeah good oneyou're right
thanks. there's an election soon with 2 legitimate choices.yeah good one
no.thanks. there's an election soon with 2 legitimate choices.
pick one or shut up. fuck your cynical bull shit.
And so, not voting, not participating, letting others make the choices, allowing others to choose for me is resistance to being controlled?Thank you, insults aside, you actually asked a valid question.
I knew one would come at some stage and I'm both surprised and impressed that it came from you.
You live under the illusion of democracy.
Your country is NOT democratic.
If no one voted for either candidate, what would be the outcome?
Now, obviously, that will never happen but it's a sliding scale. If people felt passionately enough to boycott the election...and more people didn't vote than did...what would be the outcome of that?
Conforming to the status quo is consent.
Voting for one because you despise the other makes you REALLY fucking easy to control
No.And so, not voting, not participating, letting others make the choices, allowing others to choose for me is resistance to being controlled?
IF you have no faith in either candidate, as many have said, then not voting sends a stronger message than voting for what someone might consider to be the lesser of two evils
Then what is your premise?
How does letting others vote while sitting on the sidelines put you in control?Conforming to the status quo is consent.
Voting for one because you despise the other makes you REALLY fucking easy to control
Here's a concept for you, seeing as it seems you need to get together with othersSurely you must know that NOT voting for Hil is a vote for DRUMPF, yush? Are you familiar with the concept of banding together with someone that you might not necessarily be in love with for the sake of defeating a far larger evil?
Or, would you say that you are more of a propaganda-fed sort, you know, like a 'beaver in a hole that stays in a dark tunnel and can't see shit'?
FFS.....
"What the fuckin difference does it make?!"
Derrrrrrrrrpppppppp-a-dee-DOOOOOOO!
Ok, got some work to do but I will return.Then what is your premise?
How does letting others vote while sitting on the sidelines put you in control?