I'm not interested in reading up on Hillsborough but you've told me all I need to know about it. Just guessing: it was a botched job by an administrator who lied to protect his reputation. The cover up failed because too many people knew the facts and eventually they came out.
Just saying that the term "conspiracy theory" has several meanings, from the vile but not uncommon cover up made by authorities or corporations to protect their money and jobs to the wild ass impossible conspiracy theories that are constructed to explain a truly historic event, like the moon landing, the collapse of the Twin Towers or the assassination of JFK.
I am not naive to look at the reasons given in the 911 report and compare them to the ones used to deny that report. From a factual point of view, the reasons given by 911 conspiracy theorists are false. Facts are verifiable. The reasons given by deniers don't meet that criteria.
Massive sweeping statements and generalisations there.
You speak as though all those who don't believe the establishment all say the same things and speak with one voice.
This is not the case.
Personally, I stick to facts, if it isn't a fact I don't use it.
Fact, the pancake theory CAN NOT be responsible for the falling of those three buildings according to the law of falling objects.
Verifiable
Now, clearly you have a prejudiced view on the subject and it's a waste of my time trying to enlighten you
9/11 isn't impossible to make happen by deception.
I am 80% certain of what happened...based on facts
I am 100% certain of what didn't happen