UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
is that what you call winning the popular vote, and losing 3 states by less than 100,000 votes combined?
The ballon mortgage of the fourth estate come due
- Thread starter choomer
- Start date
SneekyNinja
Well-Known Member
choomer
Well-Known Member
It only took me countering your argument 5X's asking to post proof for you to do it too (it might be nice to have links, but that would be asking too much).
You also wanted me to prove your point for you (which is not mine) and so I asked for YOU provide YOUR proof.
What you did post is other news outlets (I assume since you don't do links) alleging that Breitbart and Fox lie too (go figure) which is not exactly of the same stature as having the owner of the NYT admitting publicly that they had strayed from their main business focus of reporting the news (you seem to miss that this was the the major focus of my post).
You claim that news outlets "...are all trash, yellow press shit." and yet where do your Hitlery popular vote counts come from?
In your post you berate the validity of the news and yet use it as vindication as well.
Whom do you rely on for those popular vote numbers anyway?
Do you use what you despise as "trash, yellow press shit" as evidence in YOUR focus of Hitlery winning the popular vote?
If we weren't living in a constitutional republic that relied on that metric instead of the electoral vote, that would be news.
But we DO live in a constitutional republic (or what is left of one) that relies on the electoral vote to elect a president for exactly the reason there is a difference.
But your aim is not divisive, eh?
Last edited:
choomer
Well-Known Member
They are very family oriented and protective which lends to that intense loyalty quotient but it has to be tempered with proper training and socialization to make it an asset otherwise they are a severe liability and safety concern when kept as pets.
Even though the following video is for a dog kennel that breeds/trains them for protection, it shows the natural aptitude they have for it.
They are working dogs tasked with the safety of the herd, bred to protect them no matter what and rely on their own judgement in doing so, but can still make excellent pets if properly trained and socialized.
I wouldn't mess w/ that kid though.
Last edited:
see4
Well-Known Member
She didn't lose in a landslide. Well she did. In the Republican rigged electoral college, she lost by a landslide. In the popular vote, she won, by a growing margin.
Last edited:
see4
Well-Known Member
So weeding through you vomit of diatribe, I will argue, no I drew my popular vote conclusion from AP and Reuters. As I mentioned before, I don't trust most news networks, including CNN and MSNBC. So there goes your theory.It only took me countering your argument 5X's asking to post proof for you to do it too (it might be nice to have links, but that would be asking too much).
You also wanted me to prove your point for you (which is not mine) and so I asked for YOU provide YOUR proof.
What you did post is other news outlets (I assume since you don't do links) alleging that Breitbart and Fox lie too (go figure) which is not exactly of the same stature as having the owner of the NYT admitting publicly that they had strayed from their main business focus of reporting the news (you seem to miss that this was the the major focus of my post).
You claim that news outlets "...are all trash, yellow press shit." and yet where do your Hitlery popular vote counts come from?
In your post you berate the validity of the news and yet use it as vindication as well.
Whom do you rely on for those popular vote numbers anyway?
Do you use what you despise as "trash, yellow press shit" as evidence in YOUR focus of Hitlery winning the popular vote?
If we weren't living in a constitutional republic that relied on that metric instead of the electoral vote, that would be news.
But we DO live in a constitutional republic (or what is left of one) that relies on the electoral vote to elect a president for exactly the reason there is a difference.
But your aim is not divisive, eh?
But yea dude, you keep saying "Hitlery" as if she could possibly be associated with Hilter at all. Nope, no divisiveness there. Fucking tool.
londonfog
Well-Known Member
I made minor adjustments Sir
see4
Well-Known Member
Yes. Somehow we are in agreement. Not sure how that happened.
The only news source I trust is AP and Reuters. And thankfully whenever I read something from NPR, CNN, Fox, et al, if the source of their news is from either AP or Reuters, I can put some faith in the information may possibly be accurate. Otherwise I keep looking for more information.
choomer doesn't seem to get that. he sees a world where Fox and Breitbart are being persecuted for giving the people the information they want to hear and everyone else, including the commies over at NPR are just filling sheep brains with sheep information. choomer is a fucking retard and I certainly don't take a word she says seriously.
londonfog
Well-Known Member
Awesome dog knew you were up to no good. Was trying to protect his/her owner. Smart protective dog
Big_Lou
Well-Known Member
Bipartisan Report
@Bipartisanism
1 hour
BREAKING: House Oversight Committee Moves To IMMEDIATELY Investigate Trump/Russia Connection https://t.co/i6Aa599czz
________________________________
JUST IN: GOP Leader BUSTED Calling Michelle Obama An ‘Ape In Heels’ (RESPONSES) https://t.co/66e6yirjgd
________________________________
Elizabeth Warren Issues Disturbing & Urgent Warning About Trump’s New Policy Chief (DETAILS) https://t.co/ZShmp6kZU8
________________________________
Ooooops!
potroastV2
Well-Known Member
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
doer was not as retarded or racist as choomer. doer was in favor of GMOs and believed in the official 9/11 narrative.Remember, he's a doer, not a thinker.
choomer is a GMO tr00f3r, a 9/11 tr00f3r, and a complete white supremacist fucktard.
potroastV2
Well-Known Member
Yeah, I was just casting out to see if any chumps grabbed the bait.
Then you come along and scare all of the fish away.
Then you come along and scare all of the fish away.
choomer
Well-Known Member
Interesting.Yeah, I was just casting out to see if any chumps grabbed the bait.
Then you come along and scare all of the fish away.
At the top of the page is the PSA:
Name Calling or general rude behavior is no longer acceptable in the Cafe, We are adults which means that we should be able to debate without resorting to name calling. Warnings will be given out if users fail to act appropriately.
Which is a bit disingenuous as in YOUR post back in 2007 you wrote (no reply function available since it's locked):
http://rollitup.org/t/personal-attacks-will-not-be-tolerated.18362/
"Since people are having a problem getting along
1) first warning will be an infraction on your account
2) Second warning will be a 15 day ban
3) Final warning is permanent ban
Threads that are of no benefit to the forum will be deleted on sight.
Personal arguments will be ok... this is what debate/discussion is all about just don't make personal insults.
Rollitup"
So, as those criteria are furnished "in your own words", what is considered a personal attack?
This doesn't qualify I guess, or is it that the above "rules" only apply to those you don't agree with?
History has proven the latter to be viewed as a reasonable assumption, but I would appreciate an "official" response.
SneekyNinja
Well-Known Member
Interesting.
At the top of the page is the PSA:
Name Calling or general rude behavior is no longer acceptable in the Cafe, We are adults which means that we should be able to debate without resorting to name calling. Warnings will be given out if users fail to act appropriately.
Which is a bit disingenuous as in YOUR post back in 2007 you wrote (no reply function available since it's locked):
http://rollitup.org/t/personal-attacks-will-not-be-tolerated.18362/
"Since people are having a problem getting along
1) first warning will be an infraction on your account
2) Second warning will be a 15 day ban
3) Final warning is permanent ban
Threads that are of no benefit to the forum will be deleted on sight.
Personal arguments will be ok... this is what debate/discussion is all about just don't make personal insults.
Rollitup"
So, as those criteria are furnished "in your own words", what is considered a personal attack?
This doesn't qualify I guess, or is it that the above "rules" only apply to those you don't agree with?
History has proven the latter to be viewed as a reasonable assumption, but I would appreciate an "official" response.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
@rollitupInteresting.
At the top of the page is the PSA:
Name Calling or general rude behavior is no longer acceptable in the Cafe, We are adults which means that we should be able to debate without resorting to name calling. Warnings will be given out if users fail to act appropriately.
Which is a bit disingenuous as in YOUR post back in 2007 you wrote (no reply function available since it's locked):
http://rollitup.org/t/personal-attacks-will-not-be-tolerated.18362/
"Since people are having a problem getting along
1) first warning will be an infraction on your account
2) Second warning will be a 15 day ban
3) Final warning is permanent ban
Threads that are of no benefit to the forum will be deleted on sight.
Personal arguments will be ok... this is what debate/discussion is all about just don't make personal insults.
Rollitup"
So, as those criteria are furnished "in your own words", what is considered a personal attack?
This doesn't qualify I guess, or is it that the above "rules" only apply to those you don't agree with?
History has proven the latter to be viewed as a reasonable assumption, but I would appreciate an "official" response.
he wants you to enforce the name calling and rude behavior warning.
seeing as how choomer is given to calling people he disagrees with "creepy faggots" (name calling) and likes to suggest that our president is a secret gay kenyan muslim (generally rude behavior), i think you should give him what he wants and ban this complete white supremacist fucktard!
cat of curiosity
Well-Known Member
we don't need to hear about your mother's menstruation, or your fetishes...
cat of curiosity
Well-Known Member
out of how many hundreds of millions of voters? pretty small fucking margin, if it's even true. i don't believe any of their shit, or shit from others on fucking pot forums...
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
when it is all said and done, hillary will have won he popular vote by about 20 times as many votes as trump won the electoral vote.
she will have more votes than any white male in the history of the united states.
you will have your alcoholic, pill popping, welfare loving, degenerate sponge of an unconscious fuckbag, @roseypeach .
so there's that.