why be happy about having Trump?

[twostrokenut]

to be fair though

Oh ya you always fair Bunk, read my sig and follow the convo's in the links and anyone can see what you're about.

 

[see4]

Ohh introduce the race card, best way to win the argument.

"White nationalist" ... Ohhhh You Pulled The Race Card!! Ahhh Stupid Progressives!! Those Libtards always playing the race card!!

That's what you sounds like. Literally.

 

[twostrokenut]

I own [and love my] guns and want a small government. I'm not a progressive. And you are blatantly retarded.

You want a federal government that tells States what to do "with an underlying set of laws, guidelines and programs drafted by the federal government."

Yet you want "a small government" and presumably you expect to retain all your rights under a Democracy.

 

[twostrokenut]

"White nationalist" ... Ohhhh You Pulled The Race Card!! Ahhh Stupid Progressives!! Those Libtards always playing the race card!!

That's what you sounds like. Literally.

Triggered.

 

[see4]

You want a federal government that tells States what to do "with an underlying set of laws, guidelines and programs drafted by the federal government."

Yet you want "a small government" and presumably you expect to retain all your rights under a Democracy.

That's correct.

Triggered.

Ok. I'm sorry I triggered your rage. I'm glad you're calm now.

 

[twostrokenut]

That's correct.

Ok. I'm sorry I triggered your rage. I'm glad you're calm now.

So what are you proposing exactly in your Article Five Convention?

 

[see4]

So what are you proposing exactly in your Article Five Convention?

No need to ratify, as Article V only covers state representation. Article V I don't think covers electors, I believe that is under Article III. In that I would ratify the clause having anything to do with electors and allow each vote to count.

Edit: I think it's Article II. I will have to brush up on my Constitutional law.

 

[twostrokenut]

No need to ratify, as Article V only covers state representation. Article V I don't think covers electors, I believe that is under Article III. In that I would ratify the clause having anything to do with electors and allow each vote to count.

Edit: I think it's Article II. I will have to brush up on my Constitutional law.

Dude, DUDE, DUDE. Article V covers ratification of changes. You need 2/3 house and senate or 2/3 convention.

 

[see4]

Dude, DUDE. Article V covers changes. You need 2/3 house and senate or 2/3 convention.

I don't know man, what's your point in asking that? I'm not concerned about the "how", I'm concerned about the "what" and "why".

 

[UncleBuck]

Oh ya you always fair Bunk, read my sig and follow the convo's in the links and anyone can see what you're about.

you left out the part about you being racist as shit, but only because you know it's true.

 

[twostrokenut]

I don't know man, what's your point in asking that? I'm not concerned about the "how", I'm concerned about the "what" and "why".

Aside from the obviousness of not actually asking anything...apply that logic quoted above to fishing, how many fish you reckon you will eat.

 

[see4]

Apply that to fishing, how many fish you reckon you will eat.

Ok, well since I know how to fish and hunt, I reckon I will eat as many fish as I catch.

But getting back to your leading question. What is your point in asking that? I'm not concerned about the "how", I'm concerned about the "what" and "why". I thought I was pretty clear on that.

 

[UncleBuck]

Apply that to fishing, how many fish you reckon you will eat.

speaking of fishing, have you and the "heil hitler" tattoo buddy had any more totally heterosexual experiences together lately?

ya know, just two neo-nazis, out on a boat, showing each other their skin...that kind of thing?

 

[twostrokenut]

Ok, well since I know how to fish and hunt, I reckon I will eat as many fish as I catch.

But getting back to your leading question. What is your point in asking that? I'm not concerned about the "how", I'm concerned about the "what" and "why". I thought I was pretty clear on that.

So you're just a philosopher on this issue. I see. Just trying to understand your position.

 

[twostrokenut]

What is your point in asking that?

Not trying to be a prick but realize I did not ask "that".

 

[see4]

Aside from the obviousness of not actually asking anything...apply that logic quoted above to fishing, how many fish you reckon you will eat.

You really should calm down, I can tell your becoming agitated.

So you're just a philosopher on this issue. I see. Just trying to understand your position.

Aren't we all? Or am I in the presence of a high ranking state or federal representative?

 

[see4]

So what are you proposing exactly in your Article Five Convention?

Not trying to be a prick but realize I did not ask "that".

Are you sure?

 

[twostrokenut]

Are you sure?

Nope. You got me there. I would like to blame it on this GT Dragon and quite a few Old Chico's but the fault is mine.

 

[twostrokenut]

Aren't we all? Or am I in the presence of a high ranking state or federal representative?

IMO the "high ranking" reps are the least informed of us all.

 

[twostrokenut]

speaking of fishing, have you and the "heil hitler" tattoo buddy had any more totally heterosexual experiences together lately?

ya know, just two neo-nazis, out on a boat, showing each other their skin...that kind of thing?

Want to bet?