MisterBouncyBounce
Well-Known Member
i get it now, thanks
it's really interesting. i wonder how energy can be factored into that. seems like maybe there would have to be some sort of anti-energy driving the split part backward.
when is now?
- Thread starter MisterBouncyBounce
- Start date
it's really interesting. i wonder how energy can be factored into that. seems like maybe there would have to be some sort of anti-energy driving the split part backward.
Uberknot
Well-Known Member
meh I think we have some carbon in there maybe some water and salt.
please create me some.....out of thin air with magnetic waves.
ohhh wait so we are still in the magical this is what we think happens stage....
MisterBouncyBounce
Well-Known Member
and we're the reaction of those 3 things.........hey could be.
quantum physics is another term for magic. The magic is real, it's you that is not.
MisterBouncyBounce
Well-Known Member
from wikipedia
The Planck time is the unique combination of the gravitational constant G, the special-relativistic constant c, and the quantum constant ħ, to produce a constant with units of time. Because the Planck time comes from dimensional analysis, which ignores constant factors, there is no reason to believe that exactly one unit of Planck time has any special physical significance. Rather, the Planck time represents a rough time scale at which quantum gravitational effects are likely to become important.[clarification needed] The nature of those effects, and the exact time scale at which they would occur, would need to be derived from an actual theory of quantum gravity. However, the reciprocal of the Planck time can be interpreted as an upper bound on the frequency of a wave. This follows from the interpretation of the Planck length as a minimal length, and hence a lower bound on the wavelength. All scientific experiments and human experiences occur over time scales that are dozens of orders of magnitude longer than the Planck time,[3] making any events happening at the Planck scale hard to detect. As of November 2016, the smallest time interval uncertainty in direct measurements is on the order of 850 zeptoseconds (850 × 10−21 seconds)[4]
The Planck time is the unique combination of the gravitational constant G, the special-relativistic constant c, and the quantum constant ħ, to produce a constant with units of time. Because the Planck time comes from dimensional analysis, which ignores constant factors, there is no reason to believe that exactly one unit of Planck time has any special physical significance. Rather, the Planck time represents a rough time scale at which quantum gravitational effects are likely to become important.[clarification needed] The nature of those effects, and the exact time scale at which they would occur, would need to be derived from an actual theory of quantum gravity. However, the reciprocal of the Planck time can be interpreted as an upper bound on the frequency of a wave. This follows from the interpretation of the Planck length as a minimal length, and hence a lower bound on the wavelength. All scientific experiments and human experiences occur over time scales that are dozens of orders of magnitude longer than the Planck time,[3] making any events happening at the Planck scale hard to detect. As of November 2016, the smallest time interval uncertainty in direct measurements is on the order of 850 zeptoseconds (850 × 10−21 seconds)[4]
cannabineer
Ursus marijanus
My trouble is that this wasn't written now. It was written then. I missed the then and am all out of time.
MisterBouncyBounce
Well-Known Member
better than being all out of love
Roger A. Shrubber
Well-Known Member
all time exists, and we can't perceive most of it. where is it written that it is immutable and unchanging? we can't see it so we have no idea if the future changes constantly because of the decisions we make "now"...whos to say an alien travelling here would see the same future today that he would have seen if he came tomorrow? or even 10 seconds later?
saying we don't have free will is just a way to avoid cosmic responsibility. thats the real balance that will judge us at the end of our existence, did we add to energy or entropy?
saying we don't have free will is just a way to avoid cosmic responsibility. thats the real balance that will judge us at the end of our existence, did we add to energy or entropy?
Singlemalt
Well-Known Member
I hate that songbetter than being all out of love
abe supercro
Well-Known Member
In the eighth dimension, and above, you have both time vectors. In this dimension it depends on your referential frame.
a senile fungus
Well-Known Member
It's all relative.
tyler.durden
Well-Known Member
tyler.durden
Well-Known Member
Cannaspace
Active Member
whats a time stamp on a post ? then or now ? proof it was then and proof it was now then, but no proof it's interesting 
i'm in a good mood posted in real time never 5:82ap
i'm in a good mood
posted in real time never 5:82ap
dannyboy602
Well-Known Member
StonedFarmer
Well-Known Member
I metaphysically smack you all
I aint even going to touch this subject unless you have somethingthat blows mymind.
Please only scientific reaponses wantex
We_got_a_thinker.jpg
I aint even going to touch this subject unless you have somethingthat blows mymind.
Please only scientific reaponses wantex
We_got_a_thinker.jpg
StonedFarmer
Well-Known Member
Is my cocainemore snortable if I eat itfirst?
Queations_life.jpg
Queations_life.jpg