Justin-case
Well-Known Member
How can one claim Russia "hacked" the election (by releasing the DNC leaks) and the democratic primary was legitimate? If the democratic primary was legitimate, what would there have been to release that could have affected the outcome of the election? If you believe Russia "hacked" the election, then you also must believe the Clinton campaign meddled in the primary and colluded with the media.
It's not a claim. I think the point is not the outcome it's the fact that Russia was trying to meddle in our election process. And give me a break, You know they didn't release anything from the rnc for a reason.
Last edited: