United States of Corporate America

Justin-case

Well-Known Member
How can one claim Russia "hacked" the election (by releasing the DNC leaks) and the democratic primary was legitimate? If the democratic primary was legitimate, what would there have been to release that could have affected the outcome of the election? If you believe Russia "hacked" the election, then you also must believe the Clinton campaign meddled in the primary and colluded with the media.

It's not a claim. I think the point is not the outcome it's the fact that Russia was trying to meddle in our election process. And give me a break, You know they didn't release anything from the rnc for a reason.
 
Last edited:

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
Do you believe that stuff was all true and accurate? From Russia?

Our intelligence agencies are mistaken?

I'll always side with our own people before foreign governments with ulterior motives. Their interference may be for completely different reasons than we assume at this point.

They have a long history over there.
If it wasn't true, I don't think the democratic party would be arguing they got hacked. I think they'd be arguing what was hacked is fake. Admitting they've been hacked admits the content of the hack was true.

Like I said before, the content of the hack is monumentally more important than who released it or why.
 

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
It's not a claim. I think the point is not the outcome it's the fact that Russian was trying to meddling in our election process. And give me a break, You know they didn't release anything from the rnc for a reason.
Like I said, that's important too. But Russia wouldn't have had anything to release had the DNC acted appropriately. So who is really to blame here?
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
If it wasn't true, I don't think the democratic party would be arguing they got hacked. I think they'd be arguing what was hacked is fake. Admitting they've been hacked admits the content of the hack was true.

Like I said before, the content of the hack is monumentally more important than who released it or why.
have fun being republican.
 

Justin-case

Well-Known Member
But @Fogdog has repeatedly told us that doesn't matter. That there's no way the public drawing their own conclusions could result in the changing of the outcome of an election.
Fog dogger is free to express his own thoughts. Like I said, for myself the fact that the russians meddled in our political process is more disturbing to me than the information they released, Regardless of the outcome.
 

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
Fog dogger is free to express his own thoughts. Like I said, for myself the fact that the russians meddled in our political process is more disturbing to me than the information they released, Regardless of the outcome.
OK, still not sure why the pissing contest is necessary though..

The Russians meddling in our elections is bad, just like the DNC meddling in our elections is bad

Consistency might help..
 
Top