damn, you are quick. Yep, just like shouting "fire" in a crowded theater, some fake news intimidates, menaces or endangers innocent people. No reason why fake news should be given a free pass. Yelling fire in a crowded theater is not free speech and neither should the pizzagate propaganda be viewed as free speech.
I'm not saying I know how fake news should be regulated. I'm just saying that there are reasons why it should be.but it's not like this shit can be dangerous beyond a few scant and scattered killings though, right?
just the price we pay for freedom.
Satire is categorized as comedy.
Nate Silver was the most conservative pollster in regards to not thinking Hillary had guaranteed wins, and he gave Trump the 30-40% change you are speaking of immediately preceding the election. However even his estimates were much farther off even 1 week before the election. That's Nate Silver, who gave Trump higher amounts of winnings compared to most other pollsters. Other pollsters were having Hillary win at even up to 95% + Big news stations did not have the election as being very close.
I agree with you here!
How about the fake news stories that white cops declared open season and killing black people on site? I remember in Dallas a lot of lives were ruined by the BLM shooter and then other copycat incidents in the days that followed earlier this year.
that's statistically true.
except he wasnt with BLM.
factually incorrect.
4/4.
Fake news is deliberately made up shit. It's nonsense. Doesn't matter which political group the news is lying about. It's all made up and all bad. And feel free to point it out if I get caught by it.
remember this chart that you made?
no, that's an optimistic projection from when hillary was already way up in the polls and a dozen women came out to confirm his self-described method of sexual assault.remember this chart that you made?
This is your brain on fake news.
and there are 4 times as many whites in this nation, moron.
the shooter was not associated with BLM, you racist dipshit.
tell us more about how "illegal aliens are destabilizing the nation".
you are a racist and on welfare and most likely food stamps.
well, i guess you are done trying to spread political propaganda. onto the personal falsehoods then.
my penis is an average size and i have posted pics of it on this forum.
racist.
Nope. You can find an exception but for the most part, the "big dog" news stations were not giving Trump 5% chance to win. Huffington Post did. Are you calling them "big dogs"? LOL. I see them as a left wing news organ, not objective and left wing propaganda can be found there. And they sell advertising space just like everybody else.Nate Silver was the most conservative pollster in regards to not thinking Hillary had guaranteed wins, and he gave Trump the 30-40% change you are speaking of immediately preceding the election. However even his estimates were much farther off even 1 week before the election. That's Nate Silver, who gave Trump higher amounts of winnings compared to most other pollsters. Other pollsters were having Hillary win at even up to 95% + Big news stations did not have the election as being very close.
Remember this map?
Who are my leaders lol? "sounds true but is not" seems like another way of saying false news?
People watch news that they think is objectively aligned with their own viewpoints. Those stations goal is to sell advertisements so you buy products. Basically news either has to be selling advertisements, or somehow sponsored/funded by other organizations who probably have their own agenda and content criteria.
how about CNN? Are they mainstream?
that has been established beyond any doubt though, much like manmade global warming.
15% is still pretty good odds of the alternate result occurring. Would you get on a jet if the trip had a 15% chance of ending in a crash? I wouldn't.
without propaganda, our racist buddy would have nothing to endlessly copy and paste to our forum.
