Russia didn't do it
- Thread starter Jimdamick
- Start date
HAF2
Well-Known Member
Your references are killing me! Good job.
squarepush3r
Well-Known Member
check the date on that "hack." Months before Trump even secured Republican nomination.
Press conference was July 2016. Putin must have an awesome time machine!
tangerinegreen555
Well-Known Member
Whatever you say, comrade.check the date on that "hack." Months before Trump even secured Republican nomination.
Press conference was July 2016. Putin must have an awesome time machine!
What's your next order from the Kremlin?
Milliardo Peacecraft
Well-Known Member
Hey, here's a treaty outlining mutual assistance between the US and Russia regarding criminal matters including cyber-crime, by which Russia is obligated to assist in a criminal investigation if they have the capacity. A criminal investigation like, say, Clinton destroying state property by deleting her emails that were on an illegal server. Oh, it was also signed by Bill Clinton.
https://www.congress.gov/treaty-document/106th-congress/22/document-text?overview=closed
https://www.congress.gov/treaty-document/106th-congress/22/document-text?overview=closed
Justin-case
Well-Known Member
Lol, Do you think Russia hacked Hillary's email account?
Milliardo Peacecraft
Well-Known Member
No, I think the emails were available the whole time the investigation was going on through a FOIA request for the XKeyScore metadata of Clinton's server. The emails weren't recovered intentionally, as the means to do so were available to any agency that cared to put in the request.
Russia didn't hack the emails, but if they had a system comparable to XKeyScore, or secured the emails though a concurrent investigation of, say, an individual that gained access to the unsecured server, providing the documents to the FBI would not only be legal, it would be their obligation under that treaty.
If they had any of that material, it wouldn't have been an act of espionage, as the server was not secured or property of the state. Trump merely asked them to comply with international treaty law if they were capable of producing any evidence. I hardly call that "treason".
see4
Well-Known Member
You offer up a lot of, "but but but", however nothing you've said or copied and pasted has anything to do with reality. Why is that?
see4
Well-Known Member
What? Now you're just making shit up off the top of your head.
You've still not provided a page number and paragraph where is stated that the Russian hacks had no effect on the election. Why is that?
tangerinegreen555
Well-Known Member
Strange bedfellows, Russia and the right wing nuts.
Would have never guessed they both swallow.
Would have never guessed they both swallow.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
unverifiable propaganda.check the date on that "hack." Months before Trump even secured Republican nomination.
Press conference was July 2016. Putin must have an awesome time machine!
cite a better source next time, racist.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
you have an active imagination kiddo.
now tell us again about how the holocaust was fake.
Milliardo Peacecraft
Well-Known Member
You always have the best arguments, Buck.
That "propaganda" was verified by the DNC and 17 intelligence agencies to be authentic. None of the timestamps on the emails or any of their contents were tampered with prior to wikileaks publication of the archive. You're squirming. Now call me a racist again, I'm sure I'll be sent reeling this time.
Long story short, Trump won, I was right, now you get to stomp your feet and throw a four year temper tantrum while companies are pouring investment into the US and the Dow is hitting 20k. YOU LOST WEENIE, CRY MORE.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
where in the report do they authenticate every single wikileak?
page number and paragraph please, holocaust denier.
Milliardo Peacecraft
Well-Known Member
When have you ever heard the claim that something wikileaks has published has been edited? One instance, is all I'm asking for.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
it's stolen material leaked by a hostile foreign government, it is not possible to verify anything of that nature you moron.
now please cite your claim that 17 intelligence agencies "verified" these to be "authentic", holocaust denier.
Milliardo Peacecraft
Well-Known Member
Their verification being, they've never said "these leaks are full of doctored information". Find a credible source saying that those leaks contained edited material, you cannot. No intelligence agency has said that the information leaked was not authentic. Wikileaks has a track record of 0 inauthentic documents ever published, you're pushing a rope. If Wikileaks published a fake document, you'd have heard about it.
You seem to think making baseless assertions and then claiming the burden of proof is on the rest of the world is somehow an argument. You are clinically insane Buck.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
first of all, that's not their job.
second of all, you claimed that 17 intelligence agencies verified them to be authentic. still waiting on you to cite that. page number and paragraph please, holocaust denier.
Milliardo Peacecraft
Well-Known Member
Where did they say the documents weren't authentic? Show me that. You know as well as I that US intelligence isn't going to dignify an organization like Wikileaks with an accolade like that, but they are vulnerable to a libel suit if they were to claim anything else. Have they ever made that claim? I didn't think so.
Shoot the messenger, the Russians rigged the election by exposing how the DNC was rigging the election. There is no basis to the claim that the leaks were provided by the Russian state, no intelligence agency will provide anything but heavy conjecture, and it's irrelevant now BECAUSE YOU ALREADY LOST. IT'S OVER BUCK, YOU LOST AND THERE'S NOTHING YOU CAN DOOOOOOOO HEHEHEHEHE I WAS RIIIIIGHT.
Shoot the messenger, the Russians rigged the election by exposing how the DNC was rigging the election. There is no basis to the claim that the leaks were provided by the Russian state, no intelligence agency will provide anything but heavy conjecture, and it's irrelevant now BECAUSE YOU ALREADY LOST. IT'S OVER BUCK, YOU LOST AND THERE'S NOTHING YOU CAN DOOOOOOOO HEHEHEHEHE I WAS RIIIIIGHT.
Padawanbater2
Well-Known Member
How is it possible to assess or verify the amount of potential damage Wikileaks allegedly caused to the Clinton campaign by publicly releasing the content of the DNC email leaks?