it was a long shot but worth taking.
they really didn't look at what was presented very well.
the fact they said we didn't provide medical stuff when we gave our MMAR lic #'s didn't cut it. if HC says we had a medical need, why isn't that good enough?
such blinders to what we said.
angering.
they said striking cannabis from the CDSA was ruled on twice is not true to a point-it was snuck in with no real argument or too late in the case. they still mentioned it anyway..??
so many things they got wrong to dismiss it but oh well....NEXT!