Flowki
Well-Known Member
When people say it's best to keep a plant as green as possible until the end why is that?.
If all the lower store leaves hold onto sugars, that energy must be produced from light and nutrients at some point. One would imagine it also takes X amount of additional energy to keep those leaves alive be it from their own stored source or a net intake.
So during the last weeks does it not amount to a waste of that stored energy+ any additional upkeep energy to keep them green?. Would one not be better off finding the lowest balanced nutrient strength possible to sustain upper foliage while allowing mid/lower to be called upon (should it work like that). At the very least to utilize the stored energy that was acquired from previous feedings and also reduce the amount required to typically keep em green during the final stage.
Maybe the line between stress starvation over ''shearing excess'' is to fine or not that black and white?.
If all the lower store leaves hold onto sugars, that energy must be produced from light and nutrients at some point. One would imagine it also takes X amount of additional energy to keep those leaves alive be it from their own stored source or a net intake.
So during the last weeks does it not amount to a waste of that stored energy+ any additional upkeep energy to keep them green?. Would one not be better off finding the lowest balanced nutrient strength possible to sustain upper foliage while allowing mid/lower to be called upon (should it work like that). At the very least to utilize the stored energy that was acquired from previous feedings and also reduce the amount required to typically keep em green during the final stage.
Maybe the line between stress starvation over ''shearing excess'' is to fine or not that black and white?.