Say goodbye to a woman's right to choose

HAF2

Well-Known Member
No, it isn't. I've taken the consistent approach to individual freedom of choice and you have not. Your approach is embedded with contradiction.

Thank you for a having a reasonable demeanor in our discussion though.
I have taken a consistent approach that the parameters you are using for your comparisons are not the same. Like I said before, we can agree to disagree I’m cool with that.
I also appreciate the reasonable demeanour of this discussion and you not calling me a baby murderer; as some like to do here. But sometimes people just disagree. Living with these disagreements is important, that’s life.

Nobody should be forced to pay or labor for another persons upkeep.

I am not here to defend WHICH procedures some people should be forced to pay for others to have. I am questioning the idea that ANYONE should be forced to do anything but leave others alone unless they have made an explicit agreement otherwise, absent any duress.
So you just don’t think people’s tax money should go for medical procedures, regardless of the procedure. I disagree, I’m happy to have my taxes go to save a life. I wish I had more money so I could actually give more to be honest.
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
And that's why you didn't post for almost a week after I doxxed you, sure pal.

University of Saskatchewan agricultural department : challenge political ideas, hmmm.
Amusing, but I'm afraid you were in error.

I used to live in SASQUATCHEWAN, not Saskatchewan.

Keep fishing though. I'll do the same.

upload_2017-1-30_9-32-54.png
 

Justin-case

Well-Known Member
I have taken a consistent approach that the parameters you are using for your comparisons are not the same. Like I said before, we can agree to disagree I’m cool with that.
I also appreciate the reasonable demeanour of this discussion and you not calling me a baby murderer; as some like to do here. But sometimes people just disagree. Living with these disagreements is important, that’s just life.


So you just don’t think people’s tax money should go for medical procedures, regardless of the procedure. I disagree, I’m happy to have my taxes go to save a life. I wish I had more money so I could actually give more to be honest.

He prefers pupils that are like a lump of clay, easily manipulated.
 

Justin-case

Well-Known Member
Amusing, but I'm afraid you were in error.

I used to live in SASQUATCHEWAN, not Saskatchewan.

Keep fishing though. I'll do the same.

View attachment 3888764

I'm not in Saskatchewan. I'm in "Sasquatch" ewan. It's a play on my avatar and is part of an inside joke.
Sorry to hear about your medical issues. I think strains which are more "narcotic" might help with your sleep. Herijuana is one that comes to mind. Some phenos of black widow seem to work too.
Never had issues with my appetite, so I can't say from experience, google might help.
Sep 14, 2016 Report
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
I have taken a consistent approach that the parameters you are using for your comparisons are not the same. Like I said before, we can agree to disagree I’m cool with that.
I also appreciate the reasonable demeanour of this discussion and you not calling me a baby murderer; as some like to do here. But sometimes people just disagree. Living with these disagreements is important, that’s life.


So you just don’t think people’s tax money should go for medical procedures, regardless of the procedure. I disagree, I’m happy to have my taxes go to save a life. I wish I had more money so I could actually give more to be honest.
Not quite my perspective. I don't think most government arises from a legitimate means and they're systemically in opposition to peace and freedom, which I hold as very high values.

I think you should be free to make all the choices you want about your body and your possessions etc., everybody should. Which of course also means by a bit of extrapolation, no person or group of persons has any right to use force to make you pay for things they like, but you don't.
 
Last edited:

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
Oh neat I haven’t been a pupil in years. I wasn’t very easily manipulated to changing my ideologies back then either.
So if your ideology is that a woman owns her own body, wouldn't it be consistent to say what she does with her body and the result of those actions / inactions is hers to own as well?
 

HAF2

Well-Known Member
Not quite my perspective. I don't think most government arises from a legitimate means and is systemically in opposition to peace and freedom, which I hold as very high values.

I think you should be free to make all the choices you want about your body and your possessions etc., everybody should. Which of course also means by a bit of extrapolation, no person or group of persons has any right to use force to make you pay for things they like, but you don't.
Well if I lived in America I would be far more pissed off having my tax dollars go to “roundin up” the illegals, enforcing a muslim ban, building a wall, paying for needles security on a second residency, investigating unfounded voter fraud, and fighting the main stream media who are getting vilified for making the president look bad when he’s doing a fine job of that all by himself.
But if you’re ok with that and not paying for medical procedures then that’s you’re prerogative. Agree to disagree.

So if your ideology is that a woman owns her own body, wouldn't it be consistent to say what she does with her body and the result of those actions / inactions is hers to own as well?
This is an exercise in futility. You will never convince me that abortion should not be subsidized by the government. I have lived in a country with socialized medicine all my life, and it has saved my life countless times. There is no point in continuing this discussion. Neither of us are going to change our minds, and that’s fine.
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
Abortion should be allowed globally. So that we may rid ourselves of the Biebers, Trumps and other types of fucktards.

Also. No one really wants to keep a rape baby.

So a person conceived by rape has fewer rights than a person conceived in consent ?
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
Well if I lived in America I would be far more pissed off having my tax dollars go to “roundin up” the illegals, enforcing a muslim ban, building a wall, paying for needles security on a second residency, investigating unfounded voter fraud, and fighting the main stream media who are getting vilified for making the president look bad when he’s doing a fine job of that all by himself.
But if you’re ok with that and not paying for medical procedures then that’s you’re prerogative. Agree to disagree.


This is an exercise in futility. You will never convince me that abortion should not be subsidized by the government. I have lived in a country with socialized medicine all my life, and it has saved my life countless times. There is no point in continuing this discussion. Neither of us are going to change our minds, and that’s fine.

Why do we always have to talk about drapes? - Peter Griffin
 

HAF2

Well-Known Member
http://www.arkleg.state.ar.us/assembly/2017/2017R/Acts/Act45.pdf

It says here that an abortion can be performed if there is a serious health risk to the woman. But their definition of serious health risk is that of a...I don't even know. A moron.


(B) "Serious health risk to the pregnant woman" does not include:

(i) A psychological or emotional condition; or


(ii) A medical diagnosis that is based on a claim of the pregnant woman or on a presumption that the pregnant woman will engage in conduct that could result in her death or that could cause substantial and irreversible physical impairment of a major bodily function of the pregnant woman;

So if the woman has mental health problems or threatens her own life if forced to carry out the pregnancy to term, that's not considered a serious health risk? This is the fucking Stone Age. What's happening?
 
Last edited:
Top