hope you're not referring to the one that went right into terms like Trumpleskin etc, while they're funny they distract from any credibility, and that one I saw above was written in January.
That article is written like it was intended for Steven Colbert, it's intent was to entertain not to be objective and deliver anything of substance, it discounts and undermines every single human that moves further and deeper into their legal efforts in hopes to drum up views and clicks for chicken little types just my opinion