Blunted 4 lyfe
Well-Known Member
Where the fuck did you learn your history?


Where the fuck did you learn your history?
He's even wasting oxygen!an oxymoron from a moron? well played, sir.
Good Lord, what a stinking pile of revisionist dogshit.National socialists would describe them better here is a good read for you
https://www.forbes.com/sites/billflax/2011/09/01/obama-hitler-and-exploding-the-biggest-lie-in-history/#1a2061c047a6
That Forbes article was absolutely hilarious. Didn't finish it so there might be a better gem but the following puts the lie to what the author is trying to say:National socialists would describe them better here is a good read for you
https://www.forbes.com/sites/billflax/2011/09/01/obama-hitler-and-exploding-the-biggest-lie-in-history/#1a2061c047a6
I'm amazed Forbes would even run racist shit like that.That Forbes article was absolutely hilarious. Didn't finish it so there might be a better gem but the following puts the lie to what the author is trying to say:
America’s most fascistic elements are ultra leftwing organizations like La Raza or the Congressional Black Caucus. These racial nationalists seek gain not through merit, but through the attainment of government privileges. What’s the difference between segregation and affirmative action? They are identical phenomena harnessing state auspices to impose racialist dogma.
Not according to a hooker that visited his room during the campaign.At least that is his real hair lol
Not a Trumpanzee?Lmao...I'm not a trump supporter. I didn't vote for him, nor do I support crazy liberal, Nazi ideology crap.
Next.
I'm not. Forbes has been a piece of shit mouthpiece for the 1% for as long as they've been around. Their anti-science campaign is amazingly dense.I'm amazed Forbes would even run racist shit like that.
And if there was a Congressional White Caucus? Or White Entertainment Television? You would be up in arms calling it racist.That Forbes article was absolutely hilarious. Didn't finish it so there might be a better gem but the following puts the lie to what the author is trying to say:
America’s most fascistic elements are ultra leftwing organizations like La Raza or the Congressional Black Caucus. These racial nationalists seek gain not through merit, but through the attainment of government privileges. What’s the difference between segregation and affirmative action? They are identical phenomena harnessing state auspices to impose racialist dogma.
Thinking is hard.And if there was a Congressional White Caucus? Or White Entertainment Television? You would be up in arms calling it racist.
You didn't know? What? Do you live in a cave or something?And if there was a Congressional White Caucus? Or White Entertainment Television? You would be up in arms calling it racist.
Not the predominantly white US Socialist party or DSA though, just the Mexicans and the blacksThat Forbes article was absolutely hilarious. Didn't finish it so there might be a better gem but the following puts the lie to what the author is trying to say:
America’s most fascistic elements are ultra leftwing organizations like La Raza or the Congressional Black Caucus.
Oh, the piece of shit article spent a lot of time trying to tie all socially progressive policies and support to fascism. The author avoided mentioning that totalitarian dictatorship, anathema to socially progressive movements like La Raza and the Black Caucus, is the central pillar of fascism.Not the predominantly white US Socialist party or DSA though, just the Mexicans and the blacks
Thanks for telling me about the DSA. I'm reading on their website, interesting stuff.Not the predominantly white US Socialist party or DSA though, just the Mexicans and the blacks
The DSA isn't a party. They say that in the very beginning of their manifesto. They are trying to enact change through raising awareness.Thanks for telling me about the DSA. I'm reading on their website, interesting stuff.
The Democratic Party has succeeded in eclipsing any center left movements to the point of obscurity. It's time all these groups got together and offered an alternative coalition. The time seems right for them. What do you think of that?
Pretty sure I didn't call them a party?The DSA isn't a party. They say that in the very beginning of their manifesto. They are trying to enact change through raising awareness.
Correct, I cited them as an example of an "organization" as per the paraphrased quote from the Forbes articleThe DSA isn't a party. They say that in the very beginning of their manifesto. They are trying to enact change through raising awareness.
I'm just poking at the idea that the DSA and other movements will coalesce into an effective third party.Pretty sure I didn't call them a party?
Anyway, there are a lot of groups on the left that could count for a lot if they coordinated their efforts.
It seems to me that the Democratic Party and even the Sanders wing has been working to obscure the idea that there's more to the New Left than just themselves.
I think it's deliberate and I think the Establishment Democratic Party knows this is their weakness.
It's an opinion piece. I don't hold them responsible for the idiot's views. If we did there would literally be no news left.I'm amazed Forbes would even run racist shit like that.
There are those who want to remove opinion from the media.It's an opinion piece. I don't hold them responsible for the idiot's views. If we did there would literally be no news left.