House Intelligence Committee calls for Grand Jury on Trump/Russia collusion

B

bundee1

Well-Known Member
Franken, killing the clock, holding his dribble just past half court. Looks around smirks, and launches a 3 pointer that clanks off the rim. So close...

Blumenthal with the offensive rebound. Blumenthal resets the clock and checks with the bench. Blumenthal gets the play from the coach, cuts through the crowd and goes in for the lay up.
 
B

bundee1

Well-Known Member
The rim is looking friendly to the visiting team today folks. Blumenthal methodically picking apart the defense, just keeps scoring layups. Oh no Blumenthal, getting greedy slips on his sweat and loses control. Dick recovers and slows it back down. Blumenthal calls time and is replaced by Hirono.
 
Big_Lou

Big_Lou

Well-Known Member
Franken stole the show, as expected. Double up on the security detail for Mrs. Yates after this -- stay away from open windows and prepared meals!

Fucking sniveling Cruz....shifty eyes, double chin, and that typical repub 'I am unable to sexually satisfy a woman' aura.

I stand by my original prediction; Drumpf's gone by June.
;)

Stephen-colbert-celebration-gif.gif
 
B

bundee1

Well-Known Member
Hirono all over the place commits a shot clock violation. Home team regains possession. Graham, getting away with the palm, and now throws himself backward from the phantom contact. What an actor. Game play stops and there seems to be some confusion amongst the officials as to who committed the foul.
 
Fogdog

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
cool2burn said:
nahh just do not like doing others work for them here is the first hit... http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/05/liberal-outlet-npr-posts-fakenews-story-french-elections-gets-called-wikileaks/ There are plenty more. Like I said all the news organizations make mistakes and report bias news these days.
Click to expand...
That wasn't fake news. The story was 100% true. The made a mistake about the source and retracted it. Nobody denies that a large body of stolen emails were dumped just seconds before a gag on reporting the French election went into effect.

Fake news is entirely made up. RT is a well known source of fake news. Not surprised you would defend such sources for your drivel.

Fogdog said:
More fake news from RT. Incirlik NATO Air Force Base:

https://www.rt.com/news/354042-turkish-police-incirlik-nato-coup/
On Thursday, a huge rally marched towards the NATO base, as people with loudspeakers chanted anti-American and anti-Israel slogans. The demonstrators claim that the US had a hand in the failed July 15 coup attempt in which 270 people died. Tens of thousands people, including members of the military, police, judiciary, media, and civil service, have been arrested in connection with the coup, which Turkish officials say was organized by US-based cleric Fethullah Gulen, Erdogan’s former ally, who is now his most hated rival.


Fake, fake, fake

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/08/06/how-russia-dominates-your-twitter-feed-to-promote-lies-and-trump-too
The main reason the media didn’t show up was that the story was substantially untrue. As a later statement by the Pentagon clarified, a peaceful protest had taken place involving about 1,000 people—not the 7,000 Turkish police reported by Russian news outlets or the 10,000 cited by Twitter users. Officials at the air base had been warned of the protest in advance. The base was not “surrounded,” Turkish security focused on securing the visit of U.S. Chairman of the Joint Chiefs Joe Dunford to Incirlik the next day.

The Incirlik disinformation campaign failed but demonstrates the unique way in which Russia can influence foreign audiences. Incirlik stories on RT and Sputnik news were rapidly promulgated by a curious group of English speakers on Twitter.

OK, fake news reporter, post something like this about an NPR story.
Click to expand...
OK, fake news reporter, post something like this about an NPR story.

crickets
.
 
Fogdog

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
bundee1 said:
Republicans having a hard time understanding the unconstitutionality of the 1st Muslim travel ban. Switch Muslim Travel to Assault Rifle and suddenly Republicans are fucking constitutional scholars.
Click to expand...
'Preventing Muslim immigration' statement disappears from Trump's campaign site
On Monday morning, President Trump's campaign website featured his December 2015 statement about "preventing Muslim immigration."

Later that afternoon, it did not.

The deletion of the statement appeared to come after Cecilia Vega of ABC News asked at Monday's White House press briefing about the statement: "If this White House is no longer calling this a Muslim ban as it did initially, why does the president's website still explicitly call for 'preventing Muslim immigration'?"

sounds very much like 1984, the novel:

https://www.quora.com/How-does-the-party-in-1984-control-history-And-why
How does the party in 1984 control history? And why?

By rewriting and altering the historical accounts and news about events.

That’s was the job of Winston Smith (the main character of Nineteen Eighty Four) at the Ministry of whatever (Truth?).

Over time, the alterations meant that practically no one will have a handle on the actuality of the events — except for the Ministry that made the alterations in the first place.

The end result is that ‘history’ is whatever the authorities say it is, and none are the wiser and none are able to contest the veracity of the official version of events.

In the book, it isn’t even clear if the Ministry itself has a true picture of those events it fudged.
 
ttystikk

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
Fogdog said:
'Preventing Muslim immigration' statement disappears from Trump's campaign site
On Monday morning, President Trump's campaign website featured his December 2015 statement about "preventing Muslim immigration."

Later that afternoon, it did not.

The deletion of the statement appeared to come after Cecilia Vega of ABC News asked at Monday's White House press briefing about the statement: "If this White House is no longer calling this a Muslim ban as it did initially, why does the president's website still explicitly call for 'preventing Muslim immigration'?"

sounds very much like 1984, the novel:

https://www.quora.com/How-does-the-party-in-1984-control-history-And-why
How does the party in 1984 control history? And why?

By rewriting and altering the historical accounts and news about events.

That’s was the job of Winston Smith (the main character of Nineteen Eighty Four) at the Ministry of whatever (Truth?).

Over time, the alterations meant that practically no one will have a handle on the actuality of the events — except for the Ministry that made the alterations in the first place.

The end result is that ‘history’ is whatever the authorities say it is, and none are the wiser and none are able to contest the veracity of the official version of events.

In the book, it isn’t even clear if the Ministry itself has a true picture of those events it fudged.
Click to expand...
I can't wait for you to start Animal Farm.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top