Free Speech Rally

SouthCross

Well-Known Member
You know more libs with a gun slung around their shoulder at Starbucks?

Not open carrying in Starbucks. They were standing on a side walk wearing bandanas and waving communist flags...open carrying.

As you put it...Lolololol. 'slung around their shoulder'.
 

PCXV

Well-Known Member
Not open carrying in Starbucks. They were standing on a side walk wearing bandanas and waving communist flags...open carrying.

As you put it...Lolololol. 'slung around their shoulder'.
Wtf did I say rallies? Not the same at all, but you know that. And yes, you put the gun sling over your shoulder.

So some liberals support 2A to some extent, so do I, what is your point?
 

SouthCross

Well-Known Member
Wtf did I say rallies? Not the same at all, but you know that. And yes, you put the gun sling over your shoulder.

So some liberals support 2A to some extent, so do I, what is your point?

The falace of using pictures to stereotype. Within the circles, open carry advocates are on a joke level. Stupid stunts that don't represent the rest of the community. Drama queens on both sides.

That's the point.
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
What have I said racist? I'm also anti pedophile if you haven't figured that out yet you are retarded. I did question the Holocaust not denied it.

I may have criticized Jews but no more than Christians and Muslims so you can't really say anti-Semitic.

But a lot of leftists are full of rage Modanna even thought about blowing up the White House. LMAO, Hillary Clinton is also "part of the resistance" though the only thing she seems to be resisting is prison. :bigjoint:
Holocaust denial crosses the line of antisemitism. "Questioning" Nazi genocide of jews with so much evidence of the fact is more than just being open minded or "free speech". It's deliberate bloody mindedness and bigotry.

The primary motivation for most deniers is anti-Semitism, and for them the Holocaust is an infuriatingly inconvenient fact of history. After all, the Holocaust has generally been recognized as one of the most terrible crimes that ever took place, and surely the very emblem of evil in the modern age. If that crime was a direct result of anti-Semitism taken to its logical end, then anti-Semitism itself, even when expressed in private conversation, is inevitably discredited among most people. What better way to rehabilitate anti-Semitism, make anti-Semitic arguments seem once again respectable in civilized discourse and even make it acceptable for governments to pursue anti-Semitic policies than by convincing the world that the great crime for which anti-Semitism was blamed simply never happened—indeed, that it was nothing more than a frame-up invented by the Jews, and propagated by them through their control of the media? What better way, in short, to make the world safe again for anti-Semitism than by denying the Holocaust?

In this as in many other things you say, you are simply wrong. Why do you want to make the world safe for antisemitism?

From there, you go on to ramble about Modanna? Who the fuck is that? And to fill out the right wing bingo card you mentioned Clinton.

I hope the guards keep your gate secure. We don't want you to get out.
 

tampee

Well-Known Member
Holocaust denial crosses the line of antisemitism. "Questioning" Nazi genocide of jews with so much evidence of the fact is more than just being open minded or "free speech". It's deliberate bloody mindedness and bigotry.

The primary motivation for most deniers is anti-Semitism, and for them the Holocaust is an infuriatingly inconvenient fact of history. After all, the Holocaust has generally been recognized as one of the most terrible crimes that ever took place, and surely the very emblem of evil in the modern age. If that crime was a direct result of anti-Semitism taken to its logical end, then anti-Semitism itself, even when expressed in private conversation, is inevitably discredited among most people. What better way to rehabilitate anti-Semitism, make anti-Semitic arguments seem once again respectable in civilized discourse and even make it acceptable for governments to pursue anti-Semitic policies than by convincing the world that the great crime Jews which anti-Semitism was blamed simply never happened—indeed, that it was nothing more than a frame-up invented by the Jews, and propagated by them through their control of the media? What better way, in short, to make the world safe again for anti-Semitism than by denying the Holocaust?

In this as in many other things you say, you are simply wrong. Why do you want to make the world safe for antisemitism?

From there, you go on to ramble about Modanna? Who the fuck is that? And to fill out the right wing bingo card you mentioned Clinton.

I hope the guards keep your gate secure. We don't want you to get out.
I still want proof the Jews were slaves that built the pyramids. Archeology says bullshit if Jews and Christians so blatantly lie about Moses why would I trust them on Hitler?

Sure Jews were treated unfairly and killed but what are they doing to Palestinians?
 
Top