Why do some have problems with people of different color

Why do some hate based on color of skin

  • fear of the unknown

    Votes: 22 48.9%
  • Jealousy

    Votes: 7 15.6%
  • taught

    Votes: 23 51.1%
  • confusion

    Votes: 8 17.8%
  • small penis

    Votes: 25 55.6%

  • Total voters
    45

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
A black person refusing service to a white person is equally outlawed.

It's this "equality" thing we've been pushing for (against retards like you).

If one person doesn't want to interact and another person(s) can threaten force to make them interact...how is that equality?

Wouldn't both people be equal if they both had the option of interacting or refusing the interaction if it wasn't based on a mutual want to interact?
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
we tried that already and as you admitted black people suffered great harm.

does anyone have the right t harm anyone else, pedophile?


Nobody has the right to force another person to use his/her body or property to serve them against that persons will. If they do, could you explain your justification?


The reason forced segregation doesn't work is because it attempts to justify offensive force as a viable means. The same is true of force integration, wherein people are stripped of their individual right of self determination.

If you could refute me, you would have, but you can't...

Plus. you are a Poopy Pants..
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

says the guy who thinks 11 year old children can consent to 31 year old adults.

If an 11 year old black child was selling lemonade and didn't want to sell you any, because you were white and crapped on their lawn would you use force to make the poor kid interact with you or would you walk away?
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
If an 11 year old black child was selling lemonade and didn't want to sell you any, because you were white and crapped on their lawn would you use force to make the poor kid interact with you or would you walk away?
we tried your way. it was called segregation. as you now admit, it caused harm. no one has the right to cause harm to others, so we outlawed it.

you are a pedophile.
 

SunnyJim

Well-Known Member
2 white men lost in the desert for days stumble upon a small public house in the middle of nowhere. Severely dehydrated, they can't believe their luck as they stumble inside and ask to buy 2 bottles of water. The bartender, a black man, does not consent to 'interacting' with them, and asks the two dying white men to leave the premises immediately.

The two white men, not wanting to 'force' the black man to interact with them or serve them, thereby saving their lives, cordially agree to leave the bar and proceed to die of thirst out front.

When the police arrive, the bartender uses the 'forced consent' precedent as just cause not to serve the white men, and is commended for his resistance from effectively being raped.
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
only racist segregationists use that term, pedophile.

Well, your assertion is false, because I just used it and I don't think it is my business to force people of different races to interact or to use force to prevent them from interacting if they both chose to.


upload_2017-6-15_18-49-14.png
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
we tried your way. it was called segregation. as you now admit, it caused harm. no one has the right to cause harm to others, so we outlawed it.

you are a pedophile.

That's an idiotic statement even for you. People who wished to associate were forcibly prevented from doing so, by your beloved government, Jim Crow.

The solution isn't to force people apart or together. The solution is to mind your own business and let individual people determine their own relationships.

You are a dimwitted clown shoes wearing cat litter sniffing Poopy Pants who I suspect has had nonconsensual relations with small rodents.
 

SunnyJim

Well-Known Member
It's for reasons clearly laid out in this thread that discrimination laws exist.

'Forced associations'. Primitive.
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
and you are a racial segregationist.


No, but I am sometimes a specie ist (speciist?)

Meaning I don't approve of your nonconsensual relations with small rodents. If you wanted to eat them, I guess I'd figure that's up to you. However what you do with them, well, I'm a little appalled by that. Does it hurt when they nip your alimentary canal ?
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
It's for reasons clearly laid out in this thread that discrimination laws exist.

'Forced associations'. Primitive.

So would you force a back person to serve a white person against the black persons will?


If one person or group of people can forcibly insist another person interact with them , is that an instance of offensive force ?
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
No, that's people acting like assholes. How does any of that refute anything I've said?
even after the racial segregation you love so much was outlawed by the government, many companies sued because they still wanted racial segregation.

that refutes everything you just said in your pathetic, simpering excuse for a shitpost.
 
Top