Why do some have problems with people of different color

[londonfog]

I see you trying to claim that some people have a right to force another person to associate with and serve others even if that person prefers not to.

I see you imagining that a group of people can somehow have rights which no individual within that group possesses. I see you trying to bolster your weak arguments by falsely asserting I'm a racist. I see you picking your nose in your stained gym shorts at your computer in your mothers basement, but I digress.


1) Is there any means by which any number of individuals can delegate to someone else the moral right to do something which none of the individuals have the moral right to do themselves?

Who in the fuck is forcing you to open a business that is open to the public ?????
If you can't answer that STFU... please

 

[Rob Roy]

Well when I'm not around I do hand the properties over to my manager. She has been with me since day one. She does not threaten me at all. I let her control it with my blessings. I think my family is going to go on vacation in July, if everything goes to plan. She will again have control over my property.
Please remember if you open a business that is open to the public you will serve everyone.
If you don't want to serve everyone, then open your business as a private club and charge a membership fee and be as racist as you so desire.

Well, if you are a free person you would certainly have every right to determine the use of your own property and with whom you will associate.



July? You should listen to some of what Eric July has to say.

 

[londonfog]

Well, if you are a free person you would certainly have every right to determine the use of your own property and with whom you will associate.



July? You should listen to some of what Eric July has to say.

I do determine the use of my property.
OPEN TO THE PUBLIC.
Even you can wash or drop off your clothes

 

[Rob Roy]

Who in the fuck is forcing you to open a business that is open to the public ?????
If you can't answer that STFU... please

Your default assumption is that government has a right to force people to seek permission to control property they ostensibly already own.

Your default position also includes the absurdity that a group of people by virtue of calling themselves government can aggregate rights which are nonexistent into a positive sum.

So, your question is a non sequitur and like asking about what unicorn farts smell like.



Here are three questions for you. Eric July could probably do a better job answering them than you.


1) Is there any means by which any number of individuals can delegate to someone else the moral right to do something which none of the individuals have the moral right to do themselves?

2) Do those who wield political power (presidents, legislators, etc.) have the moral right to do things which other people do not have the moral right to do? If so, from whom and how did they acquire such a right?

3) Is there any process (e.g., constitutions, elections, legislation) by which human beings can transform an immoral act into a moral act (without changing the act itself)?

 

[Rob Roy]

I do determine the use of my property.
OPEN TO THE PUBLIC.
Even you can wash or drop off your clothes

That's a smart business choice. Sometimes you make sense.

Now how about answering the questions I asked you ?

 

[londonfog]

Your default assumption is that government has a right to force people to seek permission to control property they ostensibly already own.

Your default position also includes the absurdity that a group of people by virtue of calling themselves government can aggregate rights which are nonexistent into a positive sum.

So, your question is a non sequitur and like asking about what unicorn farts smell like.



Here are three questions for you. Eric July could probably do a better job answering them than you.


1) Is there any means by which any number of individuals can delegate to someone else the moral right to do something which none of the individuals have the moral right to do themselves?

2) Do those who wield political power (presidents, legislators, etc.) have the moral right to do things which other people do not have the moral right to do? If so, from whom and how did they acquire such a right?

3) Is there any process (e.g., constitutions, elections, legislation) by which human beings can transform an immoral act into a moral act (without changing the act itself)?

In full honest I only read the part in red.
It forced me to asked you this question.
If one has his property should he be allowed to offer a service where you can fuck under age kids. I mean it is his/her property.

 

[londonfog]

That's a smart business choice. Sometimes you make sense.

Now how about answering the questions I asked you ?

I think I did

 

[dagwood45431]

I'm anxious to have you demonstrate your logic. So I have a series of questions for you. To make it more succinct, I'll use a friends format to ask them. Looking forward to your well thought out and "logical" responses...


1) Is there any means by which any number of individuals can delegate to someone else the moral right to do something which none of the individuals have the moral right to do themselves?

We've been through this ad nauseam here and months ago on grass shitty. You've been through this ad nauseam with others here and elsewhere. Logic and reason cannot permeate your addled head for some reason. I'm done wrestling with you, pig. In the meantime, for your viewing pleasure, may I present this?

 

[dagwood45431]

From my perspective, I, nor anybody else has any right to force a person to associate with me or to use their property in ways that I and not they, determine.


I am disappointed that you would force a black man to serve a white man against his will. Sounds pretty slavish.

 

[dagwood45431]

Well when I'm not around I do hand the properties over to my manager. She has been with me since day one. She does not threaten me at all. I let her control it with my blessings. I think my family is going to go on vacation in July, if everything goes to plan. She will again have control over my property.
Please remember if you open a business that is open to the public you will serve everyone.
If you don't want to serve everyone, then open your business as a private club and charge a membership fee and be as racist as you so desire.

Why, it's so simple a child could understand it. Rob Roy is exceptionally stupid.

 

[Rob Roy]

I think I did

No, you did not.

Here, I'll repost to make it easier for you.




Here are three questions for you. Eric July could probably do a better job answering them than you.


1) Is there any means by which any number of individuals can delegate to someone else the moral right to do something which none of the individuals have the moral right to do themselves?

2) Do those who wield political power (presidents, legislators, etc.) have the moral right to do things which other people do not have the moral right to do? If so, from whom and how did they acquire such a right?

3) Is there any process (e.g., constitutions, elections, legislation) by which human beings can transform an immoral act into a moral act (without changing the act itself)?

 

[Rob Roy]

No thanks your mom already made me some breakfast.

 

[Rob Roy]

We've been through this ad nauseam here and months ago on grass shitty. You've been through this ad nauseam with others here and elsewhere. Logic and reason cannot permeate your addled head for some reason. I'm done wrestling with you, pig. In the meantime, for your viewing pleasure, may I present this?

There's no need to be so prickly.

 

[srh88]

I know I know, you have dibs on the kids.


So, are you saying that a black person is incapable of being a racist, and that you would force a black man to use his body and his property to serve a white man against his will?

So you're under the assumption everyone is racist? Must be a shitty way to live

 

[Rob Roy]

So you're under the assumption everyone is racist? Must be a shitty way to live

No, I am under the assumption that nobody has any right to use offensive force to create an involuntary human interaction.

Also, I assume you will not answer any of these 5 questions, because you have poor critical thinking skills.


1) Is there any means by which any number of individuals can delegate to someone else the moral right to do something which none of the individuals have the moral right to do themselves?

2) Do those who wield political power (presidents, legislators, etc.) have the moral right to do things which other people do not have the moral right to do? If so, from whom and how did they acquire such a right?

3) Is there any process (e.g., constitutions, elections, legislation) by which human beings can transform an immoral act into a moral act (without changing the act itself)?

4) When law-makers and law-enforcers use coercion and force in the name of law and government, do they bear the same responsibility for their actions that anyone else would who did the same thing on his own?

5) When there is a conflict between an individual's own moral conscience, and the commands of a political authority, is the individual morally obligated to do what he personally views as wrong in order to "obey the law"?

 

[srh88]

No, I am under the assumption that nobody has any right to use offensive force to create an involuntary human interaction.

Also, I assume you will not answer any of these 5 questions, because you have poor critical thinking skills.


1) Is there any means by which any number of individuals can delegate to someone else the moral right to do something which none of the individuals have the moral right to do themselves?

2) Do those who wield political power (presidents, legislators, etc.) have the moral right to do things which other people do not have the moral right to do? If so, from whom and how did they acquire such a right?

3) Is there any process (e.g., constitutions, elections, legislation) by which human beings can transform an immoral act into a moral act (without changing the act itself)?

4) When law-makers and law-enforcers use coercion and force in the name of law and government, do they bear the same responsibility for their actions that anyone else would who did the same thing on his own?

5) When there is a conflict between an individual's own moral conscience, and the commands of a political authority, is the individual morally obligated to do what he personally views as wrong in order to "obey the law"?

Require this around 4 eastern time for a serious answer.. driving right now

 

[Rob Roy]

In full honest I only read the part in red.
It forced me to asked you this question.
If one has his property should he be allowed to offer a service where you can fuck under age kids. I mean it is his/her property.

Nice deflection. In the United States the statutory age of consent varies from tax farm to tax farm. You would need to fix on which Plantation you are talking about for your absurd and childish question to even have any semblance of making sense even in the realm of your dissonance ridden brain.

However, I'd rather not talk about where you can or cannot bang kids.

So, are you admitting you can't answer my questions or will you keep trying to talk about banging kids?

 

[Rob Roy]

Require this around 4 eastern time for a serious answer.. driving right now

Live to ride, ride to live bro.

 

[londonfog]

No, you did not.

Here, I'll repost to make it easier for you.




Here are three questions for you. Eric July could probably do a better job answering them than you.


1) Is there any means by which any number of individuals can delegate to someone else the moral right to do something which none of the individuals have the moral right to do themselves? Why do you think you are in a crazy house

2) Do those who wield political power (presidents, legislators, etc.) have the moral right to do things which other people do not have the moral right to do? If so, from whom and how did they acquire such a right? Well it does stop some from just busting in your home and beating the shit out of you and then taking your wife. We call it laws and voting

3) Is there any process (e.g., constitutions, elections, legislation) by which human beings can transform an immoral act into a moral act (without changing the act itself)? Fucking sex with a minor is illegal and should always be. Stop trying to change the language of consent and stop being a fucking pervert pedo. Your mother would be ashamed of the causes you fight for

Answers in the red Robert

 

[dagwood45431]

No thanks your mom already made me some breakfast.

She's a caring individual and often feeds the indigent.