Why do some have problems with people of different color

Why do some hate based on color of skin

  • fear of the unknown

    Votes: 22 48.9%

  • Jealousy

    Votes: 7 15.6%

  • taught

    Votes: 23 51.1%

  • confusion

    Votes: 8 17.8%

  • small penis

    Votes: 25 55.6%
  • Total voters
    45
londonfog

londonfog

Well-Known Member
Rob Roy said:
I see you trying to claim that some people have a right to force another person to associate with and serve others even if that person prefers not to.

I see you imagining that a group of people can somehow have rights which no individual within that group possesses. I see you trying to bolster your weak arguments by falsely asserting I'm a racist. I see you picking your nose in your stained gym shorts at your computer in your mothers basement, but I digress.


1) Is there any means by which any number of individuals can delegate to someone else the moral right to do something which none of the individuals have the moral right to do themselves?
Click to expand...
Who in the fuck is forcing you to open a business that is open to the public ?????
If you can't answer that STFU... please
 
Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
londonfog said:
Well when I'm not around I do hand the properties over to my manager. She has been with me since day one. She does not threaten me at all. I let her control it with my blessings. I think my family is going to go on vacation in July, if everything goes to plan. She will again have control over my property.
Please remember if you open a business that is open to the public you will serve everyone.
If you don't want to serve everyone, then open your business as a private club and charge a membership fee and be as racist as you so desire.
Click to expand...

Well, if you are a free person you would certainly have every right to determine the use of your own property and with whom you will associate.



July? You should listen to some of what Eric July has to say.
 
Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
londonfog said:
Who in the fuck is forcing you to open a business that is open to the public ?????
If you can't answer that STFU... please
Click to expand...

Your default assumption is that government has a right to force people to seek permission to control property they ostensibly already own.

Your default position also includes the absurdity that a group of people by virtue of calling themselves government can aggregate rights which are nonexistent into a positive sum.

So, your question is a non sequitur and like asking about what unicorn farts smell like.



Here are three questions for you. Eric July could probably do a better job answering them than you.


1) Is there any means by which any number of individuals can delegate to someone else the moral right to do something which none of the individuals have the moral right to do themselves?

2) Do those who wield political power (presidents, legislators, etc.) have the moral right to do things which other people do not have the moral right to do? If so, from whom and how did they acquire such a right?

3) Is there any process (e.g., constitutions, elections, legislation) by which human beings can transform an immoral act into a moral act (without changing the act itself)?
 
londonfog

londonfog

Well-Known Member
Rob Roy said:
Your default assumption is that government has a right to force people to seek permission to control property they ostensibly already own.

Your default position also includes the absurdity that a group of people by virtue of calling themselves government can aggregate rights which are nonexistent into a positive sum.

So, your question is a non sequitur and like asking about what unicorn farts smell like.



Here are three questions for you. Eric July could probably do a better job answering them than you.


1) Is there any means by which any number of individuals can delegate to someone else the moral right to do something which none of the individuals have the moral right to do themselves?

2) Do those who wield political power (presidents, legislators, etc.) have the moral right to do things which other people do not have the moral right to do? If so, from whom and how did they acquire such a right?

3) Is there any process (e.g., constitutions, elections, legislation) by which human beings can transform an immoral act into a moral act (without changing the act itself)?
Click to expand...
In full honest I only read the part in red.
It forced me to asked you this question.
If one has his property should he be allowed to offer a service where you can fuck under age kids. I mean it is his/her property.:roll:
 
dagwood45431

dagwood45431

Well-Known Member
Rob Roy said:
I'm anxious to have you demonstrate your logic. So I have a series of questions for you. To make it more succinct, I'll use a friends format to ask them. Looking forward to your well thought out and "logical" responses...


1) Is there any means by which any number of individuals can delegate to someone else the moral right to do something which none of the individuals have the moral right to do themselves?
Click to expand...

We've been through this ad nauseam here and months ago on grass shitty. You've been through this ad nauseam with others here and elsewhere. Logic and reason cannot permeate your addled head for some reason. I'm done wrestling with you, pig. In the meantime, for your viewing pleasure, may I present this?

 
dagwood45431

dagwood45431

Well-Known Member
londonfog said:
Well when I'm not around I do hand the properties over to my manager. She has been with me since day one. She does not threaten me at all. I let her control it with my blessings. I think my family is going to go on vacation in July, if everything goes to plan. She will again have control over my property.
Please remember if you open a business that is open to the public you will serve everyone.
If you don't want to serve everyone, then open your business as a private club and charge a membership fee and be as racist as you so desire.
Click to expand...
Why, it's so simple a child could understand it. Rob Roy is exceptionally stupid.
 
Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
londonfog said:
I think I did
Click to expand...

No, you did not.

Here, I'll repost to make it easier for you.




Here are three questions for you. Eric July could probably do a better job answering them than you.


1) Is there any means by which any number of individuals can delegate to someone else the moral right to do something which none of the individuals have the moral right to do themselves?

2) Do those who wield political power (presidents, legislators, etc.) have the moral right to do things which other people do not have the moral right to do? If so, from whom and how did they acquire such a right?

3) Is there any process (e.g., constitutions, elections, legislation) by which human beings can transform an immoral act into a moral act (without changing the act itself)?
 
Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
dagwood45431 said:
We've been through this ad nauseam here and months ago on grass shitty. You've been through this ad nauseam with others here and elsewhere. Logic and reason cannot permeate your addled head for some reason. I'm done wrestling with you, pig. In the meantime, for your viewing pleasure, may I present this?

Click to expand...


There's no need to be so prickly.

upload_2017-6-19_10-42-27.png
 
Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
srh88 said:
So you're under the assumption everyone is racist? Must be a shitty way to live
Click to expand...

No, I am under the assumption that nobody has any right to use offensive force to create an involuntary human interaction.

Also, I assume you will not answer any of these 5 questions, because you have poor critical thinking skills.


1) Is there any means by which any number of individuals can delegate to someone else the moral right to do something which none of the individuals have the moral right to do themselves?

2) Do those who wield political power (presidents, legislators, etc.) have the moral right to do things which other people do not have the moral right to do? If so, from whom and how did they acquire such a right?

3) Is there any process (e.g., constitutions, elections, legislation) by which human beings can transform an immoral act into a moral act (without changing the act itself)?

4) When law-makers and law-enforcers use coercion and force in the name of law and government, do they bear the same responsibility for their actions that anyone else would who did the same thing on his own?

5) When there is a conflict between an individual's own moral conscience, and the commands of a political authority, is the individual morally obligated to do what he personally views as wrong in order to "obey the law"?
 
srh88

srh88

Well-Known Member
Rob Roy said:
No, I am under the assumption that nobody has any right to use offensive force to create an involuntary human interaction.

Also, I assume you will not answer any of these 5 questions, because you have poor critical thinking skills.


1) Is there any means by which any number of individuals can delegate to someone else the moral right to do something which none of the individuals have the moral right to do themselves?

2) Do those who wield political power (presidents, legislators, etc.) have the moral right to do things which other people do not have the moral right to do? If so, from whom and how did they acquire such a right?

3) Is there any process (e.g., constitutions, elections, legislation) by which human beings can transform an immoral act into a moral act (without changing the act itself)?

4) When law-makers and law-enforcers use coercion and force in the name of law and government, do they bear the same responsibility for their actions that anyone else would who did the same thing on his own?

5) When there is a conflict between an individual's own moral conscience, and the commands of a political authority, is the individual morally obligated to do what he personally views as wrong in order to "obey the law"?
Click to expand...
Require this around 4 eastern time for a serious answer.. driving right now
 
Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
londonfog said:
In full honest I only read the part in red.
It forced me to asked you this question.
If one has his property should he be allowed to offer a service where you can fuck under age kids. I mean it is his/her property.:roll:
Click to expand...

Nice deflection. In the United States the statutory age of consent varies from tax farm to tax farm. You would need to fix on which Plantation you are talking about for your absurd and childish question to even have any semblance of making sense even in the realm of your dissonance ridden brain.

However, I'd rather not talk about where you can or cannot bang kids.

So, are you admitting you can't answer my questions or will you keep trying to talk about banging kids?
 
londonfog

londonfog

Well-Known Member
Rob Roy said:
No, you did not.

Here, I'll repost to make it easier for you.




Here are three questions for you. Eric July could probably do a better job answering them than you.


1) Is there any means by which any number of individuals can delegate to someone else the moral right to do something which none of the individuals have the moral right to do themselves? Why do you think you are in a crazy house

2) Do those who wield political power (presidents, legislators, etc.) have the moral right to do things which other people do not have the moral right to do? If so, from whom and how did they acquire such a right? Well it does stop some from just busting in your home and beating the shit out of you and then taking your wife. We call it laws and voting

3) Is there any process (e.g., constitutions, elections, legislation) by which human beings can transform an immoral act into a moral act (without changing the act itself)? Fucking sex with a minor is illegal and should always be. Stop trying to change the language of consent and stop being a fucking pervert pedo. Your mother would be ashamed of the causes you fight for
Click to expand...
Answers in the red Robert
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top