Greengenes707
Well-Known Member
So I will still wait for actual fixture measurements as I figured.Not only that I like to drink and party. Sometimes my drinking will fuck things up in addition to my senility.
It NIST that proposed to not use the sphere for LED measurement in favor of a radiospectrometer. It was NIST that proposed the Flux Intensity setup adopted by CIE.
I'm not the only one that bitches.
View attachment 3967505
View attachment 3967506
Luminous Intensity was once upon a time THE most measured LED characteristic. Why do they choose total flux? Here is an an image from an old OSRAM datasheet.
View attachment 3967511
What is the problem with wanting the measurements needed? I will show you why you cannot get this data from the spreadsheet and or datasheet. Please be patient.
Thank you. I am working on just that in my spare time that is really non-existent. I do have a spectoradiometer that is has a NIST LED profile calibration.
I have 1750K, 2200K, 2700K, 3000K CCT CoBs. Do you have a preference?
And why do you selectively take things out of context...it doesn't help your point, and digs you deeper and deeper. Sphere are quite accurate at what they do. As are GONIOMETERS that I also said, but you choose to leave out because they show how everything you just said is false. Sphere do their job perfectly...lighting distribution is not part of that job. But again if you would actually read or listen...Goniometers do.
And when they are within .5% of the sphere numbers...you don't have a leg to stand on. This is not opinion or white paper manipulation. Just simple end of the day real world measurements by valid and industry standard instruments.