Proof the DNC was not hacked by Russia

choomer

choomer

Well-Known Member
It's been found both in an executive summary (memo) to Dumph (https://consortiumnews.com/2017/07/24/intel-vets-challenge-russia-hack-evidence/) and independent forensic research (https://theforensicator.wordpress.com/guccifer-2-ngp-van-metadata-analysis/) that file transfer speeds used when copying the DNC emails far exceed what is possible over the internet via a "hack" as is discovered from the files metadata.

July 5, 2016: In the early evening, Eastern Daylight Time, someone working in the EDT time zone with a computer directly connected to the DNC server or DNC Local Area Network, copied 1,976 MegaBytes of data in 87 seconds onto an external storage device. That speed is many times faster than what is physically possible with a hack (over the internet).

It thus appears that the purported "hack" of the DNC by Guccifer 2.0 (the self-proclaimed WikiLeaks source) was not a hack by Russia or anyone else, but was rather a copy of DNC data onto an external storage device. Moreover, the forensics performed on the metadata reveal there was a subsequent synthetic insertion - a cut-and-paste job using a Russian template, with the clear aim of attributing the data to a "Russian hack." This was all performed in the East Coast time zone.
Click to expand...
Every file has what is called "metadata" (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metadata#Storage) that stores all sorts of information such as:

Means of creation of the data
Purpose of the data
Time and date of creation
Creator or author of the data
Location on a computer network where the data was created
Standards used
File size

and other information depending on the type of file.
Just like GPS metadata that you strip from a cell phone pic before uploading it here. You do strip it, right? ;).
It's file information you don't "see" in the file but is there every time that file type is created.

The metadata holds that "1976 Mb of data in 87 sec." is written at the time of file creation.
It can be and according to the quote above, has been manipulated, but not without leaving tell-tale signs of that manipulation that the CRC (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyclic_redundancy_check) data created during the compression as a fail-safe against data corruption indicate.

Interesting that one of the Awan brothers (that provided "IT services" to Debbie Wasserman Schultz to the tune of $5M over a decade) has been apprehended for bank fraud after wire transferring ~$198K to Palestine while getting ready to fly there out of Dulles airport and was still being paid as a DWS employee until being apprehended with charges leveled against him this week.
If the DWS was such a good and lucrative employer, why would you want to leave the job, let alone the country?
 
SneekyNinja

SneekyNinja

Well-Known Member
choomer said:
It's been found both in an executive summary (memo) to Dumph (https://consortiumnews.com/2017/07/24/intel-vets-challenge-russia-hack-evidence/) and independent forensic research (https://theforensicator.wordpress.com/guccifer-2-ngp-van-metadata-analysis/) that file transfer speeds used when copying the DNC emails far exceed what is possible over the internet via a "hack" as is discovered from the files metadata.



Every file has what is called "metadata" (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metadata#Storage) that stores all sorts of information such as:

Means of creation of the data
Purpose of the data
Time and date of creation
Creator or author of the data
Location on a computer network where the data was created
Standards used
File size

and other information depending on the type of file.
Just like GPS metadata that you strip from a cell phone pic before uploading it here. You do strip it, right? ;).
It's file information you don't "see" in the file but is there every time that file type is created.

The metadata holds that "1976 Mb of data in 87 sec." is written at the time of file creation.
It can be and according to the quote above, has been manipulated, but not without leaving tell-tale signs of that manipulation that the CRC (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyclic_redundancy_check) data created during the compression as a fail-safe against data corruption indicate.

Interesting that one of the Awan brothers (that provided "IT services" to Debbie Wasserman Schultz to the tune of $5M over a decade) has been apprehended for bank fraud after wire transferring ~$198K to Palestine while getting ready to fly there out of Dulles airport and was still being paid as a DWS employee until being apprehended with charges leveled against him this week.
If the DWS was such a good and lucrative employer, why would you want to leave the job, let alone the country?
Click to expand...
Trust me, you're just plain wrong.

And file metadata doesn't store file transfer/creation speeds, that's hilarious.
 
SneekyNinja

SneekyNinja

Well-Known Member
choomer said:
Prove to me your in depth understanding of 7zip and rar files then. The "forensicator" does a pretty good job proving his understanding.
Did you read the memo?
Click to expand...
So hang on, you're talking about when the files were zipped?

That could have been long long after they were downloaded and creating a sub 2GB zip file in less that 2 mins is easy for anyone with a decent PC.

Just bear in mind I know how most common files are arranged internally from the bit level up.
 
tampee

tampee

Well-Known Member
Yeah I thought it was bullshit anyone could have hacked the DNC with enough time on their hands like many of the members here who are online all day and night. Lol
 
choomer

choomer

Well-Known Member
SneekyNinja said:
So hang on, you're talking about when the files were zipped?
That could have been long long after they were downloaded and creating a sub 2GB zip file in less that 2 mins is easy for anyone with a decent PC.
Just bear in mind I know how most common files are arranged internally from the bit level up.
Click to expand...
You haven't read the memo yet, have you?

Since you are versed in information technology it should be nothing for you to dispute the findings the forensicator came to by downloading the file yourself (instructions at https://pastebin.com/fN9uvUE0 ) and doing some basic forensics.
 
SneekyNinja

SneekyNinja

Well-Known Member
choomer said:
You haven't read the memo yet, have you?

Since you are versed in information technology it should be nothing for you to dispute the findings the forensicator came to by downloading the file yourself (instructions at https://pastebin.com/fN9uvUE0 ) and doing some basic forensics.
Click to expand...
Do you think this is some kinda magic shit that only wizards can do?

It simply doesn't work like that, again, I design software for a living.

I can prove it, want me to send a link?

:fire:
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
choomer said:
It's been found both in an executive summary (memo) to Dumph (https://consortiumnews.com/2017/07/24/intel-vets-challenge-russia-hack-evidence/) and independent forensic research (https://theforensicator.wordpress.com/guccifer-2-ngp-van-metadata-analysis/) that file transfer speeds used when copying the DNC emails far exceed what is possible over the internet via a "hack" as is discovered from the files metadata.



Every file has what is called "metadata" (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metadata#Storage) that stores all sorts of information such as:

Means of creation of the data
Purpose of the data
Time and date of creation
Creator or author of the data
Location on a computer network where the data was created
Standards used
File size

and other information depending on the type of file.
Just like GPS metadata that you strip from a cell phone pic before uploading it here. You do strip it, right? ;).
It's file information you don't "see" in the file but is there every time that file type is created.

The metadata holds that "1976 Mb of data in 87 sec." is written at the time of file creation.
It can be and according to the quote above, has been manipulated, but not without leaving tell-tale signs of that manipulation that the CRC (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyclic_redundancy_check) data created during the compression as a fail-safe against data corruption indicate.

Interesting that one of the Awan brothers (that provided "IT services" to Debbie Wasserman Schultz to the tune of $5M over a decade) has been apprehended for bank fraud after wire transferring ~$198K to Palestine while getting ready to fly there out of Dulles airport and was still being paid as a DWS employee until being apprehended with charges leveled against him this week.
If the DWS was such a good and lucrative employer, why would you want to leave the job, let alone the country?
Click to expand...
what a fucking idiot you are. back to the daily stormer for you.
 
tangerinegreen555

tangerinegreen555

Well-Known Member
choomer said:
It's been found both in an executive summary (memo) to Dumph (https://consortiumnews.com/2017/07/24/intel-vets-challenge-russia-hack-evidence/) and independent forensic research (https://theforensicator.wordpress.com/guccifer-2-ngp-van-metadata-analysis/) that file transfer speeds used when copying the DNC emails far exceed what is possible over the internet via a "hack" as is discovered from the files metadata.



Every file has what is called "metadata" (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metadata#Storage) that stores all sorts of information such as:

Means of creation of the data
Purpose of the data
Time and date of creation
Creator or author of the data
Location on a computer network where the data was created
Standards used
File size

and other information depending on the type of file.
Just like GPS metadata that you strip from a cell phone pic before uploading it here. You do strip it, right? ;).
It's file information you don't "see" in the file but is there every time that file type is created.

The metadata holds that "1976 Mb of data in 87 sec." is written at the time of file creation.
It can be and according to the quote above, has been manipulated, but not without leaving tell-tale signs of that manipulation that the CRC (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyclic_redundancy_check) data created during the compression as a fail-safe against data corruption indicate.

Interesting that one of the Awan brothers (that provided "IT services" to Debbie Wasserman Schultz to the tune of $5M over a decade) has been apprehended for bank fraud after wire transferring ~$198K to Palestine while getting ready to fly there out of Dulles airport and was still being paid as a DWS employee until being apprehended with charges leveled against him this week.
If the DWS was such a good and lucrative employer, why would you want to leave the job, let alone the country?
Click to expand...
TL;DR
200w (9).gif .
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top