SchmoeJoe
Well-Known Member
Look up the university research that demonstrates that weed grown with UV has 20%-30% more thc. It's a well known fact, though it may be more accurate to say well established fact, that cannabis plants convert cbg into thc and cbd when exposed to UV.You say shorter, and yet, your picture shows longer. Way longer. All everyone here shows is basically first few weeks of bloom and veg, and obviously, that's where CMH shines. Show me your week 8 with pure CMH all throughout next to LED next to HPS, same strain and everything.
And I've got a ton of experience lol. More terpenes and CBN? Show me the lab results side by side. I would find it incredible if a light moved anything more than 0.5%, as genetics accounts for 99% of the terpene profile. That shows me you dont really get your weed tested...or you would know these things. Things like the sample you send will show a different %THC based on where you take it from the plant, but terpene profile is locked to genetics.
Which commercial facilities do you know? I dont know who you're talking about when you say that that "all have been exclusively using LEC". It is honestly just laughable. Top growers grow in a greenhouse outdoors anyways, and use supplemental lighting to simulate seasonal shifts. Been that way for the last decade, so shows how much you know about commercial cannabis cultivation...im talking hectares of weed. You would think, that if CMH had such amazing results, they would be using it no?
To say that anything is "locked to genetics" completely disregards the fact that these traits are responses to the environment the organism evolved in. Environment is nearly as important as genetic potential.