Noinch
Well-Known Member
What? what a male looks like has heaps to do with looking for what's passed on, colour, trichome coverage, structure. Otherwise you'd have to breed out every single male plant you get to even have the slightest clue of what traits might carry on. But it's pretty obvious when you have a purple male covered in trichomes that has huge clusters of pollen sacks some of those traits will be passed on, and it's especially useful when comparing the next generation of males as well not just looking for traits passed on in the female plantsNot actually. I've had plenty star dawg leaning phenos(structure, smell and flavor) that look nothing like the male. The male is actually a terrible, visual representation of star dawg.
What a male looks like has no real value in breeding. It's about what traits that male passes along in it's progeny. You can't know that from looking at it.
Knowing what a female looks like is obviously pretty damn important, a male isn't that much different. Obviously you can have extremely good males that don't look that great but it's the same with females
Last edited: