ttystikk
Well-Known Member
Tell us again how the Democratic saved the country- for the banksters, leaving millions of homeowners sleeping in their cars.
Democratic Voters Are Done with Party Centrists—and the Progressives Are a Majority
- Thread starter KillerIndica
- Start date
SneekyNinja
Well-Known Member
By not letting it fall to ruin because of the failures of the previous administration?
I suppose it's Obama's fault that so many people bought houses they couldn't afford through a downturn, amirite?
I suppose it's Obamas fault that we're a nation of consumers and discarders?
You people spend hours and hours crying online everyday because you want everything handed to you...
Maybe if you put your time and effort into educating yourself in something you might actually be able to achieve it yourself?
The problem with this country is that people havent got equal opportinities for success and yet its the privileged whites who are making the most noise and ignoring the people whos opportunity was precluded by the institutional racism you want to ignore.
ttystikk
Well-Known Member
Ah, so record profits for the banks and record bonuses for the banksters are fine, and all those homeowners got robosigned out of their homes because it was their own fault.
And I'm the idiot?
And pay no attention to who underwrote the multiple speaking engagements for $400k apiece.
Gosh, no obvious connection there...
ttystikk
Well-Known Member
SneekyNinja
Well-Known Member
You're so retarded you literally haven't even a comeback.
I'm gonna go sleep now, enjoy spending all night posting spam, loser.
ttystikk
Well-Known Member
Histrionics
flint same poison water.
londonfog
Well-Known Member
Damn you really are so stupid you didn't understand the meaning of his speech. Stay the fuck off of youtube.
Your life is of a 50 old plus man who can't find a date, praying for 15 dollars an hour, because rich people are rich.
Too fucking cheap to take a lady on a date and spend hours on porn sites on the web to satisfy your lacking of love. What I miss ? oh and would love to wear the trousers in a relationship for once
Last edited:
SneekyNinja
Well-Known Member
Scathing but hilariously true, lol.
KillerIndica
Well-Known Member
You seem upset. Millennial?Damn you really are so stupid you didn't understand the meaning of his speech. Stay the fuck off of youtube.
Your life is of a 50 old plus man who can't find a date, praying for 15 dollars an hour, because rich people are rich.
Too fucking cheap to take a lady on a date and spend hours on porn sites on the web to satisfy your lacking of love. What I miss ? oh and would love to wear the trousers in a relationship for once
\
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
they have rawn pawl, the guy who wants to dismantle civil rights, as less authoritarian than anyone else?I don't see anyone defending Republicans. No one seems to think they're worth defending.
I just see you poor benighted souls continually defending Democrats as if they're much better or indeed very different.
This is how your beloved Savior, Barack Obama, is seen by the outside world, in this case British journalists;
The US Presidential Election 2012
This is a US election that defies logic and brings the nation closer towards a one-party state masquerading as a two-party state.
The Democratic incumbent has surrounded himself with conservative advisors and key figures — many from previous administrations, and an unprecedented number from the Trilateral Commission. He also appointed a former Monsanto executive as Senior Advisor to the FDA. He has extended Bush tax cuts for the wealthy, presided over a spiralling rich-poor gap and sacrificed further American jobs with recent free trade deals. Trade union rights have also eroded under his watch. He has expanded Bush defence spending, droned civilians, failed to close Guantanamo, supported the NDAA which effectively legalises martial law, allowed drilling and adopted a soft-touch position towards the banks that is to the right of European Conservative leaders. Taking office during the financial meltdown, Obama appointed its principal architects to top economic positions. We list these because many of Obama's detractors absurdly portray him as either a radical liberal or a socialist, while his apologists, equally absurdly, continue to view him as a well-intentioned progressive, tragically thwarted by overwhelming pressures. 2008's yes-we-can chanters, dazzled by pigment rather than policy detail, forgot to ask can what? Between 1998 and the last election, Obama amassed $37.6million from the financial services industry, according to the Center for Responsive Politics. While 2008 presidential candidate Obama appeared to champion universal health care, his first choice for Secretary of Health was a man who had spent years lobbying on behalf of the pharmaceutical industry against that very concept. Hey! You don't promise a successful pub, and then appoint the Salvation Army to run it. This time around, the honey-tongued President makes populist references to economic justice, while simultaneously appointing as his new Chief of Staff a former Citigroup executive concerned with hedge funds that bet on the housing market to collapse. Obama poses something of a challenge to The Political Compass, because he's a man of so few fixed principles.
LOL
SneekyNinja
Well-Known Member
I'm way to the left of most Democrats, unrealistically left some would say.
I reckon they're the best chance of getting something even roughly close to what I'd like passed, no?
ttystikk
Well-Known Member
As usual, a witless diatribe that doesn't come anywhere near the debate.
Clearly it's the best you can manage.
Good luck trying to get people to take you seriously. I know I won't.
ttystikk
Well-Known Member
I think we should let his next door neighbor take care of him.
SneekyNinja
Well-Known Member
What he says is entirely accurate.
And literally noone takes you seriously, we could do a poll and you'd be destroyed but it's against TOS.
ttystikk
Well-Known Member
Of course you'd agree. You can't be dragged kicking and screaming to a substantial debate, either.
Neither of you are worthy of anything but trolling.
KillerIndica
Well-Known Member
You mean he'd lose a popularity contest. How...sophomore of you...
Fogdog
Well-Known Member
its a conspiracy. Your go to when you have nothing to say.
SneekyNinja
Well-Known Member
No I mean he's been debunked so many times, literally over and over that all that's left is to ridicule his stupid views.
No-one even disagrees with his philosophy overall, we just don't see torpedo'ing the Democrats as a way of getting progressive legislation passed.
Most also don't like the fact he thinks we should ignore racism and it'll disappear.
Or the fact he thinks he's an intellectual but spends his time posting blogs and literal fake news.
He even posted an article about how military commanders will have to follow a 650 step flowchart before making decisions from a place where the second article was "Joint Forces get arthritis".
travisw
Well-Known Member
Nothing for labor unions?
How Obama has tilted the workplace for unions
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/how-obama-has-tilted-the-workplace-for-unions/article/2601330
Obama labor board flexes its muscles
Organized labor will have more to celebrate this Labor Day than in decades thanks to a string of recent victories.
https://www.politico.com/story/2015/09/unions-barack-obama-labor-board-victories-213204
Obama’s Latest Lifeline for Unions
https://www.wsj.com/articles/obamas-latest-lifeline-for-unions-1454371263
The Obama Administration Just Delivered Another Big Victory to Unions
http://fortune.com/2016/03/23/obama-unions/
Obama administration spends millions to push labor unions overseas
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/dec/10/golden-hammer-obama-administration-spends-millions/
Nothing for homeowners: His Home Affordable Modification Program helped about 1.6 million borrowers lower their mortgage and stay in their home.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/25/business/dealbook/foreclosure-prevention-mortgage-lending.html
Bank Profits: Were better under Bush 1 and were only about average under Obama.
https://seekingalpha.com/article/4012069-clinton-trump-presidents-bank-stocks-1980sminus-2016?page=2
Income Inequality:
The Income Gap Began To Narrow Under Obama
https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/the-income-gap-began-to-narrow-under-obama/
As to your war stuff, I totally agree wars are shitty. Does it mean he's a Republican? Fuck no.
How about you explain something for me? Given that during the two years Hillary and Bernie overlapped in the Senate, Sanders co-sponsored 19 pieces of legislation that Clinton introduced, while Clinton signed on in support of seven Sanders bills. Vote studies from Congressional Quarterly find that Clinton voted with the Senate Democratic leadership 99 percent of the time in 2008 and 98 percent in 2007. For Sanders, the rate was 98 and 97 percent, respectively, during those two years.
http://www.newsweek.com/2016/02/26/bernie-sanders-hillary-clinton-alike-426301.html
How in the fuck can you not see the differences between Obama and the republicans, but you see so much difference between Hillary and Bernard?
