Kingrow1
Well-Known Member
Fair enough but i feel the radiant heat removed by the thin glass is barely but a fraction of the radiant heat contained within the lights, my lazy analogy was more an attempt to keep it simple, there are scientific principles that give hard math answers, i did a lot of the maths in rough and came to this conclusion as well as from studies on light and leaf surface temperature. Here is a link to visable light as a heat source (obviously we know of lasers already) -Well your lazer analogy has little to do with light bulb reflectors but I said I read the 50% thing.
i still know I can't cool my 2 reflectors open without glass with the same fans I use with them sealed and air cooled. And I am just exhausting my room through them. They aren't even isolated.
I also can't get them as close to the plants without stress open without glass. Further proving they are cooler behind fan cooled glass.
And glass does cut a bunch of uv and ir and along with it radiant heat.
So I guess I disagree with your premise from my own testing and research.
I have to stop air cooling through the lamps in winter just to keep room heat up. Just running fans on low is not enough without disconnecting the ducts to the lamps. Doesn't that prove they are cooler in sealed air cooled fixtures?
The radiant heat and the heat from the lamps are continually removed immediately from the source.
It works so well lamps that rely on temp for their output like de hps shouldn't be air cooled. It lowers their temp too much to work properly.
The more I think about it the more evidence there is that they run much cooler.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermal_radiation