I'm sorry but this is just pure nonsense. The current through the PN junction is purely a function of the voltage applied across the PN junction and the junction temperature - anything else in parallel with it is irrelevant if the voltage and temp remains constant. If I increase the voltage, the current increases in a non-linear curve. If I put another diode in parallel that has a lower Vf it will simply draw more current. The voltage only changes when the total load current exceeds the capacity of the power supply.The issue is wiring in parallel two LEDs with different forward voltages forcing the voltage to something other than the LEDs actual forward voltage. Due to the dynamic nature of the Vf, the interaction between the two LEDs is complex.
Exactly. That is how this topic got started when @CobKits recommended to power the CoB in parallel with an HLG.You're putting parallel non-linear, temp sensitive loads on a constant current supply. Only idiots do that
they do... because it is....I did not expect so many to think it is okay to connect CoBs in parallel when powered with an HLG.
One CLU058-1825C4 driven with an HLG-240H-54B with nothing connected to the dimmer wires will draw ~230 Watts. 52V x 4.45A1 it will top out on voltage and run at ~150W
No it wont. learn how to read a datasheetOne CLU058-1825C4 driven with an HLG-240H-54B with nothing connected to the dimmer wires will draw ~230 Watts. 52V x 4.45A
sounds like you know nothing at all about the 54B driver. Maybe stick to commenting on things you know.Top out on voltage? That's not a thing.
sounds like you dont understand LEDs at all for that matterNo mater the voltage it is going to draw every mA it can get.
Again just please stop spreading misinformation, werent you going to start your own thread?Without any balancing circuitry, more likely, one would draw 140W and the other 90W. It could be better or much worse depending on Vf.
.No it wont. learn how to read a datasheet
sounds like you know nothing at all about the 54B driver. Maybe stick to commenting on things you know.
sounds like you dont understand LEDs at all for that matter
Although unbalanced strings and CoB often will lead to thermal runaway it's not about thermal runaway, it's about unbalanced strings and CoBs where thermal issues are a major contributing factor.go ahead and start (yet another) thread about driver selection and thermal runaway... but you shouldnt use cobs as your example because thats simply bad info
Where do you get the idea that it's okay to power LEDs strings or CoBs in parallel.Again just please stop spreading misinformation, werent you going to start your own thread?
Listen to the Force, "Start your own thread, Luke!".
A constant current driver means the current is constant. The datasheet says 4.45 Amps. That means the driver will supply 4.45 Amps without regard for the load The Vf of the CLU058 with a case temp of 25°C and 4.45 Amp is about 57V minus the temperature coefficient of 2.7V or a forward voltage of 54.5V typical.
The HLG is going to still push 4.45 Amps even if the LED voltage exceeds the 54V of the HLG. The HLG is a Buck step down regulator which senses the current and changes the duty cycle to modulate the current. A buck driver requires the input voltage headroom to be greater than the output typically by at least 4V at 1 Amp. More volts for higher currents. While the HLG is spec'd at 54V it is actually about 60V. So even if you cooled the LED with water chilled to 0°C and the Tj dropped to 25°C raising the Vf to 57V the HLG will still push 4.45 Amps.
Although unbalanced strings and CoB often will lead to thermal runaway it's not about thermal runaway, it's about unbalanced strings and CoBs where thermal issues are a major contributing factor.
RE: Current Balance
Where do you get the idea that it's okay to power LEDs strings or CoBs in parallel.
Show me documentation from any manufacturer or an accredited source that says it's okay to power LEDs in parallel. You cannot, becasue no such thing exists.
From EDN A respected and authoritative Electrical Engineering source.
A paper titled Overcome the challenges of driving parallel LED strings
https://www.edn.com/design/led/4424539/2/Overcome-the-challenges-of-driving-parallel-LED-strings
From LED's Magazine: Avoiding thermal runaway when driving multiple LED strings
An LED is similar to a standard diode by virtue of being a current-driven device. It has an I-V curve in which the current and voltage are non-linear and a small change in its forward voltage can translate into a large current change.
A typical white LED can have a forward voltage of 3.3V with as much as a 20% variation at its rated current. If 10 LEDs are used in series, it’s possible that one string may require 33V to adequately drive it, while a second string requires 39.6V at the same current. If these two strings are wired in parallel, the lower voltage string pulls significantly more current than intended..
The voltage across one sense resistor can be regulated by an external control circuit to adjust the output voltage higher or lower to accurately control the LED current. While this regulates the LED current in one string, it does not necessarily do a good job for the second. It can actually make the current in the second worse, as in the case where the control loop increases the output voltage for the regulated string, but the second string has the lower voltage drop of the two.
Another problem is when the first string’s required voltage is less than the second’s. The feedback sets the output voltage to get proper regulation in the first string, but the second doesn’t have enough voltage headroom and the current in that string is reduced.
http://www.ledsmagazine.com/articles/print/volume-6/issue-2/features/led-design-forum-avoiding-thermal-runaway-when-driving-multiple-led-strings-magazine.html
View attachment 4045908
The basic assumption made with this circuit suggestion is that the 700mA regulated current from the LED driver will be shared approximately evenly across both strings of LEDs, i.e. each string of LEDs will see 350mA of current. However, this is rarely the case.
View attachment 4045909
In a test using identical SMD LEDs from a single production batch and using 1 Ohm resistors to help balance out the forward voltages, the currents flowing in each string were measured to be 306mA and 394mA. The LED driver was still doing its job of correctly limiting the current to 700mA, but the over‐current flowing through the second string was seriously overdriving the LEDs.
Worse, as the LEDs started to get warm, the combined forward voltage of the higher current string started to decrease. This increased the imbalance and more current started to flow through the already over‐driven string. The current through the other string of LEDs reduced as the constant current driver compensated, so they started to cool down and their forward voltage increased.
The net result was thermal runaway with the majority of current flowing through one string only, even though the LEDs were mounted on a large metal heat sink. The test was stopped when the current imbalance was 600mA to 100mA. Obviously, if this situation was allowed to continue, the over‐driven string would eventually fail and then the entire 700mA would flow through the remaining intact string and destroy that as well.
And this circuit is often given as a recommended application example!
Page with many articles regarding the issues associated with parallel LEDs
https://ledsinparallel.wordpress.com/
I have attached 3 PDFs regarding parallel strings.
I understand you you do not have the cognitive capacity to dazzle with brilliance, but please discontinue trying to baffle people with your BS. You are doing everyone that believes you BS a disservice.
Still haven't figured out how constant voltage works eh? Perhaps you should actually look up the specs on the HLG-240H-54B.....
A constant current driver means the current is constant. The datasheet says 4.45 Amps. That means the driver will supply 4.45 Amps without regard for the load The Vf of the CLU058 with a case temp of 25°C and 4.45 Amp is about 57V minus the temperature coefficient of 2.7V or a forward voltage of 54.5V typical.
The HLG is going to still push 4.45 Amps even if the LED voltage exceeds the 54V of the HLG. The HLG is a Buck step down regulator which senses the current and changes the duty cycle to modulate the current. A buck driver requires the input voltage headroom to be greater than the output typically by at least 4V at 1 Amp. More volts for higher currents. While the HLG is spec'd at 54V it is actually about 60V. So even if you cooled the LED with water chilled to 0°C and the Tj dropped to 25°C raising the Vf to 57V the HLG will still push 4.45 Amps.
Although unbalanced strings and CoB often will lead to thermal runaway it's not about thermal runaway, it's about unbalanced strings and CoBs where thermal issues are a major contributing factor.
RE: Current Balance
Where do you get the idea that it's okay to power LEDs strings or CoBs in parallel.
Show me documentation from any manufacturer or an accredited source that says it's okay to power LEDs in parallel. You cannot, becasue no such thing exists.
From EDN A respected and authoritative Electrical Engineering source.
A paper titled Overcome the challenges of driving parallel LED strings
https://www.edn.com/design/led/4424539/2/Overcome-the-challenges-of-driving-parallel-LED-strings
From LED's Magazine: Avoiding thermal runaway when driving multiple LED strings
An LED is similar to a standard diode by virtue of being a current-driven device. It has an I-V curve in which the current and voltage are non-linear and a small change in its forward voltage can translate into a large current change.
A typical white LED can have a forward voltage of 3.3V with as much as a 20% variation at its rated current. If 10 LEDs are used in series, it’s possible that one string may require 33V to adequately drive it, while a second string requires 39.6V at the same current. If these two strings are wired in parallel, the lower voltage string pulls significantly more current than intended..
The voltage across one sense resistor can be regulated by an external control circuit to adjust the output voltage higher or lower to accurately control the LED current. While this regulates the LED current in one string, it does not necessarily do a good job for the second. It can actually make the current in the second worse, as in the case where the control loop increases the output voltage for the regulated string, but the second string has the lower voltage drop of the two.
Another problem is when the first string’s required voltage is less than the second’s. The feedback sets the output voltage to get proper regulation in the first string, but the second doesn’t have enough voltage headroom and the current in that string is reduced.
http://www.ledsmagazine.com/articles/print/volume-6/issue-2/features/led-design-forum-avoiding-thermal-runaway-when-driving-multiple-led-strings-magazine.html
View attachment 4045908
The basic assumption made with this circuit suggestion is that the 700mA regulated current from the LED driver will be shared approximately evenly across both strings of LEDs, i.e. each string of LEDs will see 350mA of current. However, this is rarely the case.
View attachment 4045909
In a test using identical SMD LEDs from a single production batch and using 1 Ohm resistors to help balance out the forward voltages, the currents flowing in each string were measured to be 306mA and 394mA. The LED driver was still doing its job of correctly limiting the current to 700mA, but the over‐current flowing through the second string was seriously overdriving the LEDs.
Worse, as the LEDs started to get warm, the combined forward voltage of the higher current string started to decrease. This increased the imbalance and more current started to flow through the already over‐driven string. The current through the other string of LEDs reduced as the constant current driver compensated, so they started to cool down and their forward voltage increased.
The net result was thermal runaway with the majority of current flowing through one string only, even though the LEDs were mounted on a large metal heat sink. The test was stopped when the current imbalance was 600mA to 100mA. Obviously, if this situation was allowed to continue, the over‐driven string would eventually fail and then the entire 700mA would flow through the remaining intact string and destroy that as well.
And this circuit is often given as a recommended application example!
Page with many articles regarding the issues associated with parallel LEDs
https://ledsinparallel.wordpress.com/
I have attached 3 PDFs regarding parallel strings.
I understand you you do not have the cognitive capacity to dazzle with brilliance, but please discontinue trying to baffle people with your BS. You are doing everyone that believes you BS a disservice.
False. please start your own thread with your thermal runaway scenarios (or look back at the threads where all this was covered 2 years ago)The HLG is going to still push 4.45 Amps even if the LED voltage exceeds the 54V of the HLG.
if you DIY it wont cost you that much to replce them 2 x 400W @ about $800-900 total, or you can put 600W in each 4x4 and yield more (~$1100 total)I want to replace 2 600w lamps in 2 4×4 tents without sacrificing much or any yield, and I've got about 1.6k budget, any recommendations?
Key phrase being "manage to function". The question is how well do they function and could you do better by driving them properly. 35 years ago I was using Sylvania GrowLux bulbs and they did fairly well. Could I do better than GrowLux? Yes. Do GrowLux function? Yes. Your anecdotal evidence is of no value.Samsung LED strips manage to function
I do not use outdated info. I ran more tests a couple of weeks ago with CoBs and with strips back in March. There are no paper written say it is okay to drive CoBs or strips in parallel. There are plenty of papers from reliable sources saying NOT to drive them in parallel.Perhaps you should stop relying on outdated info.
I typically design strips to operate at 48V and use 54V HLGs and HEPs. In my lab I have just about every 54V HLG Mean Well makes. So when I said they run up to 60V that's because I have measured it many times. I manufacture my own inexpensive buck drivers which can be powered with CC or CV power supplies. I also use Texas Instruments LM3466 to balance the current in multiple strips.Perhaps you should actually look up the specs on the HLG-240H-54B....
Idiotic remark,save them for someone that might give a shit..Still haven't figured out how constant voltage works eh
Hey buddy I have 3-8 cob kits listed on eBay for sale I got all the parts for 2 of them from cobkits but yea saling mine and the work awesome and I run 8 citizen 1212 in my one 4x4 and work great well good luck on finding lights cobkits will get ya going at decent price isI want to replace 2 600w lamps in 2 4×4 tents without sacrificing much or any yield, and I've got about 1.6k budget, any recommendations?