You can't compare PPFD to PPF.1013 PPFD in half a meter. I have a friend growing with a 400w HPS, and the plant is stretchy and super skinny, despite the light being 8-12” above it. Nowhere near as healthy and happy as what I grow.
I wasn’t comparing PPF to PPFD. It’s 1013 PPFD in half a meter. I never said anything about PPF. You did.You can't compare PPFD to PPF.
1013 PPFD in half a meter. I have a friend growing with a 400w HPS, and the plant is stretchy and super skinny, despite the light being 8-12” above it. Nowhere near as healthy and happy as what I grow.
Da fuq? I mentioned a few PPF values and you offered a PPFD spot measurement in return. If not to compare to those PPF values, what was I supposed to do with that then? Nothing really, because it's incomparable ...I wasn’t comparing PPF to PPFD. It’s 1013 PPFD in half a meter. I never said anything about PPF. You did.
We did. 1013 PPFD in roughly a half meter (0.466). I believe CobKits did the math for me and corrected me. So, relatively, a microgrower or closet grower would have the power of a 600w HPS in a half-meter 18” above the canopy....let me stop you right here, do not I repeat DO NOT reproduce.
That is something you should seriously consider doing, we had this argument nearly a year ago and you still haven't learned anything.
A square YARD is 3'x3'. A square meter is 39.37"x39.37". 1,296in2 vs 1,550in2. Where is your math???
We certainly have done no such thing.
So we’re in agreement over the corrected math then, right? I’m talking application-based. If CobKits’s math is correct, a closet or microgrower would get 1013 PPFD ( I think we said 54-56x18 for the three other emitters, .466 with the 200w unit ) which is in the 600w HPS range.Sure ya would
Your phone’s LED? I have no clue what you mean. If you mean your phone’s screen or camera flash, no you cannot.That’s not really the greatest way to compare, I can put out the same ppfd with my phones led as a 1000w de if I confine it to a small enough area.
Your phone’s LED? I have no clue what you mean. If you mean your phone’s screen or camera flash, no you cannot.
Honestly, I am helping out a friend with his grow and took a plant to him. He’s using 400w HPS and the plant looks skinny and stretchy. Not healthy at all. From 8-12” above.
Did you measure average PPFD over the whole area?So we’re in agreement over the corrected math then, right? I’m talking application-based. If CobKits’s math is correct, a closet or microgrower would get 1013 PPFD ( I think we said 54-56x18 for the three other emitters, .466 with the 200w unit ) which is in the 600w HPS range.
It’s not. The emitters spread it over a 5sqft/0.466 meters at 18” above the canopy. It’s measured right after it’s assembled. CobKits calculated it separately with no background information except the factors in the equation.Did you measure average PPFD over the whole area?
If it's just one spot measurement then it's completely useless.
Whatever you say. We’ll see how this run goes.Your friend's ability should be in question, rather than the 400 watter.
Plenty grows in the 400 hps club spanking your 250 watt led
Not saying that led light couldn't compare to one, just that you're not.
CobKits confirmed the reading independently. Relative to the growing area, which is viable for 1-2 decent sized plants, I’m right.The problem is that you STILL do not understand that ppfd is relative to square area. Take a 1000 watt DE and use it to light a 100 sq/ft area and then use my phones led (yes camera flash) to light a 1 square centimeter area which one do you think puts out more ppfd? Do you really think everyone else is wrong and you are right?
What am I not understanding? It covers the area I need covered in 1013 PPFD using 200w. 600w HPS will deliver that intensity to a square meter, I believe. I don’t need to cover a square meter.You still don't understand, ...sad
Sounds more like you’re projecting.A lot unfortunately.
But I literally explained why I’m right, and you haven’t come up with a rebuttal.I'd probably say the same thing if I had no idea what I was talking about and I was too embarrassed to admit it.
as someone said you can create the intensity of a 600W HPS with the LED on your phone over a small area. there is nothing special about 150,250,400,600,1000W HPS or any type of LED or fluorescent that allows any of them to achieve intensity the other techs cant.But I literally explained why I’m right, and you haven’t come up with a rebuttal.
Not only that, I did say a few posts back that I’m not an electrician. I’m not afraid to admit I misapprehended something, but CobKits helped me figure out the step I was missing and inadvertently confirmed that, in the space that I was referring to, 5sq.ft./0.466 meters, I do, indeed, have 1013 PPFD, and a 600w HPS puts out about 900-1200 PPFD, so in the space I need to light, I do have the intensity of a 600w HPS over half a square meter. Not a full square meter, which is what a 600w HPS covers, but I have the intensity of it confined to the space I need for 200w.
I just figured it would help people who just want to grow one or two medium sized plants, not on the “industry standard scale” you guys have decided to come up with. I’m just saying, it will be sufficient for a new grower looking to have a good, small personal grow. I don’t think it’s confusing at all. You know that I’m technically right. Not wholly, but technically.as someone said you can create the intensity of a 600W HPS with the LED on your phone over a small area. there is nothing special about 150,250,400,600,1000W HPS or any type of LED or fluorescent that allows any of them to achieve intensity the other techs cant.
yes your 250W light can create the same intensity of a 600 or 1000W HPS over a given area, but comparing/equating them is completely irrelevant and misleading.
HQ LED will always be 25-40% more efficient tham HID.
calling it more than twice as efficient is like saying the 3W LED from my cell phone* is brighter than a gavita at 1100W** and thus is 300X more efficient.
*over a 1"x1" area
**over a 10' x10' area
its an utterly meaningless comparison, and misleading and confusing to people who are new to the LED scene
sorry i wont concede this. you're literally the only person in the thread that believes that.You know that I’m technically right. Not wholly, but technically.