True, but laws are designed to prevent harm to people as much as punish those who cause harm. Most of us think this is overkill when it comes to cannabis, but it's an effective tool for reducing drunks on the roads. Drunks kill families.Evidence of "marijuanas in your bloodstream" is not evidence that a harm to somebody occurred.
If laws were designed to prevent harm to people, why hasn't war been declared "illegal" ? Why are many laws based in malum prohibita ?True, but laws are designed to prevent harm to people as much as punish those who cause harm. Most of us think this is overkill when it comes to cannabis, but it's an effective tool for reducing drunks on the roads. Drunks kill families.
WTF kind of argument is that? War IS illegal unless you happen to be the leader of a country and control the army.If laws were designed to prevent harm to people, why hasn't war been declared "illegal" ?
You wouldn't have enough money to save your life if you were drunk and killed my family.A person harmed by a negligent driver should certainly be restituted.
So, laws don't apply to some people. if they are "leaders" ? Interesting.WTF kind of argument is that? War IS illegal unless you happen to be the leader of a country and control the army.
You wouldn't have enough money to save your life if you were drunk and killed my family.
I don't think so. There is no way to prove impairment beyond a reasonable doubt. I am going to be more careful about how long I wait before driving - most of us know when we are too buzzed to pass a roadside test, wait a half hour and you're good. IMO.We are fucked as patients....
I don't play children's games. Have a great day, son.So, laws don't apply to some people. if they are "leaders" ? Interesting.
In your zeal to flex your internet muscles, you seem to have missed the obvious. many laws are NOT designed to prevent harm to people, they are designed to dictate and control people.
Kill your family? Where did that come from? What if I was a "leader" and I accidently dropped a bomb on them, would that be okay as long as it was legal and well, you know, a law existed which was designed to protect me in that case?
You as well, be safe on the roads, there are dangerous people out there who think government officials should be exempt from the same morality as nongovernment people.I don't play children's games. Have a great day, son.
Well, the first guy will. Under our charter I am innocent until proven guilty. Simply identifying that I have consumed does not translate to impaired. Failing a roadside sobriety test may be grounds for further investigation, but an admission of use, possession or smell cannot be used to prove criminality in court - all will be completely legal. I am only worried about my ability to drive and not my thc level.under current rules ....we will have to prove we are not impaired...or be caught up in the system....
pass me the gun....could be like playing Russian roulette
full disability once the laws change it would seem..We are fucked as patients....
I already got that - and went back to work. I couldn't handle the boredom.full disability .