whitebb2727
Well-Known Member
Plants replace it.Fire burns oxygen, it doesn't create it. Haven't you ever seen the glass over the candle experiment?
My bad. Ate some cannabutter earlier.
Plants replace it.Fire burns oxygen, it doesn't create it. Haven't you ever seen the glass over the candle experiment?
That is just to show the long explanation for anyone who seriously doubts. You can google a dozen sources in 5 seconds to tell you a candle burns 10-12 grams of co2 per hour. That's not controversial.I read that post on the other forum too, but it still doesn't answer questions like why do propane Co2 generators exist when you can just burn some candles. Also, the data that user is using, doesn't come from cited sources.
So you lost me in the math,That is just to show the long explanation for anyone who seriously doubts. You can google a dozen sources in 5 seconds to tell you a candle burns 10-12 grams of co2 per hour. That's not controversial.
That's fine. So why do Co2 generators create up to 20,000 BTUs an hour while a candle only gives off a 100? That's what I'm having trouble with.That is just to show the long explanation for anyone who seriously doubts. You can google a dozen sources in 5 seconds to tell you a candle burns 10-12 grams of co2 per hour. That's not controversial.
I don't know, why do people spend $60 for a gallon of "Grow" water when ammonium sulfate costs pennies?I read that post on the other forum too, but it still doesn't answer questions like why do propane Co2 generators exist when you can just burn some candles. Also, the data that user is using, doesn't come from cited sources.
The take away is, assuming you can rig it in such a way as to not burn your house down ( I have faith! ) then burning 4 paraffin candles 12 hours a day is the equivalent of emptying a 20 lb co2 tank every 2 weeks or so.So you lost me in the math,
What is the takeaway.
Is it ultimately just as effective to burn candles?
Get a Co2 meter and give it a shot. You're the OP, it's in your hands to deliver some actual dataI don't know, why do people spend $60 for a gallon of "Grow" water when ammonium sulfate costs pennies?
I hear you, but think about this, weed growers adapted a lot of the pre-existing technology of the world to weed, it wasn't "invented" for a home grow. A co2 generator can be built powerful as fuck, fill up HUGE greenhouses in minute. You can adjust it, control it. It's an industrial machine, built for industrial applications. Hell yeah it can be adapted to growing weed at home! But, like, my rooms are 10 X 10. It's not a 100 x 100 green house. You can used powerful machinery, capable of blasting co2, but think about it, 10 x 10, easier ways to raise co2. You can't regulate it (except by blowing out candles) or set on timer, or flood 3000 ppm in the next minute if you so chose, but.... 1 lb 1.5 lbs co2 a day.That's fine. So why do Co2 generators create up to 20,000 BTUs an hour while a candle only gives off a 100? That's what I'm having trouble with.
Sorry, i should have said all smoke is bad for plants and in excessive amounts will clog/slow the stomatas.Jeez, ok man, be the guy worried about the toxicity of burning a candle. Burning. A. Candle...
Here's two articles, one by a guy explaining how "toxic" a paraffin candle is:
http://www.epicureantable.com/articles/acandles.htm
And OSHA's analysis of paraffin wax fumes, from paraffin candles, the most widely burned candles in the history of the world:
https://www.osha.gov/dts/sltc/methods/partial/pv2047/2047.html
You can roll with the "Illuminating thoughts on toxic candles" if you want.
And here's and example of one of these Weapons of Mass Destruction right here: The Big Candle industry tries to fool the consumer by selling it as a friendly sounding "desk waterfall"to spread "zen" around your office... BUT DON'T BE FOOLED! This little fella,placed in a grow room?!?! CAN YOU IMAGINE?! Death sentence. Instant wilting, malnutrition, 50% drop in yield, guaranteed...
Haters gonna hate just for the sake of hatin'.
Also, if you'll notice, I adjusted the formula. The guy who posted that estimated the burn rate of paraffin to be about half of what it is, thus decreasing the co2 potency of his figures by halfI read that post on the other forum too, but it still doesn't answer questions like why do propane Co2 generators exist when you can just burn some candles. Also, the data that user is using, doesn't come from cited sources.
... And the astute observer could deduce from that you could increase the output of each individual candle by increasing the diameter of the wickAlso, if you'll notice, I adjusted the formula. The guy who posted that estimated the burn rate of paraffin to be about half of what it is, thus decreasing the co2 potency of his figures by half
The "room must be sealed" thing is way overblown. Does a room need to be sealed to ensure 0% leakage of every extra molecule of co2 you create? Yes. That doesn't mean you can't elevate the average level of co2 in the air. Again, in a 3 x 3 tent, it'd be slightly trickier (though still easily doable. this isn't a raging inferno. Maybe the word paraffin is making it sound scary? We're talking every day candles. I'm sure the average guy smart enough set up a grow can figure out some safe combination of candle + water + cup and, you get the added satisfaction of knowing you're including all 4 elements in your grow: Earth, air, water, & fire )If there was a benefit I guess more questions need answered.
How much heat would it create?
Would the heat simply put you in a good range to take advantage of co2?
To take advantage the room would need to be sealed.
Once I seal my room would I be better off just getting a co2 setup?
I have to stop now because
I have bbq sauce in my arm hair.
I'm not one to tell anyone to do something they think is unhealthy, but look at the sources. The people who write about the toxicities of paraffin candles, kinda the crystal-wearing wellness sect, then look that it's and extremely basic substance, pure paraffin wax is lab tested OSHA approved as non toxic, and it should be noted that most all carcinogens are attributed to aromatic additives. So don't use scented candles if you're worried. But we are talking about regular, run of the mill, most widely used candles on earth. Broccoli has carcinogens. Really, what you would worry most about a candle is the co2, which is exactly what you're going for. You don't live in your grow room anyway. If you did, you'd produce enough co2 on your own... Honestly, it boils down to, would you be worried about having something like this on your desk? if yes, then don't consider candles. If something like this on a desk wouldn't freak you out, go for it.My post was for the fire risk. Most tents are lined with mylar which is pretty fire resistant but the outer material is not. There is also the issue with paraffin based candles emitting toxic chemicals like toluene and benzene. Paraffin wax is a petroleum by-product that is created from the sludge waste when crude oil is refined into gasoline. I rarely burn candles but when I do they are always beeswax or soy based.
I have to disagree, carbon monoxide (CO) is what you want to watch out for.I'm not one to tell anyone to do something they think is unhealthy, but look at the sources. The people who write about the toxicities of paraffin candles, kinda the crystal-wearing wellness sect, then look that it's and extremely basic substance, pure paraffin wax is lab tested OSHA approved as non toxic, and it should be noted that most all carcinogens are attributed to aromatic additives. So don't use scented candles if you're worried. But we are talking about regular, run of the mill, most widely used candles on earth. Broccoli has carcinogens. Really, what you would worry most about a candle is the co2, which is exactly what you're going for. You don't live in your grow room anyway. If you did, you'd produce enough co2 on your own... Honestly, it boils down to, would you be worried about having something like this on your desk? if yes, then don't consider candles. If something like this on a desk wouldn't freak you out, go for it.
C'mon bro, first you were worried house would burn down, then that the flame would burn all the oxygen, now you're worried about carbon monoxide? Which is it? Other people are worried about benzene and toluene, "clogging and slowing stomata with smoke"... Well, then, if it's carbon monoxide that you're now worried about, you don't need to worry at all!!! It's a candle, bro. candles produce spurts, just tiny spurts, of carbon monoxide in the smoke when you blow them out. You can find an article talking about the "sulfur poisoning" when you light the match that lights the candle, but let's be real. When there is a flame, the carbon monoxide is so, so infinitesimally small, that.... they're able to make a cheap as hell product known as a "candle", lab tested, grandmother approved, enjoyed the world over, every day in a variety of applications Even the people who ARE afraid of candles aren't afraid of carbon monoxide! They are afraid of other things they shouldn't be afraid of, like "benzene and toluene" oooh... (Here's a study showing no benzene)I have to disagree, carbon monoxide (CO) is what you want to watch out for.