Trump nominates Brett Kavanaugh to replace Anthony Kennedy on the Supreme Court

ttystikk

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
zeddd said:
I am against free speech?
Do you have any other modes, such as eco drive or are you programmed to full insanity mode and run that continuously. Your software needs upgrading to something more appropriate than barking moron. Love free speech, you sound like a republican with your “notions” and your “free speech”. Nazis use the same language, does that bother you? Not that I have any regard for your opinion.
Click to expand...
Yet another intolerant shit post.
 
ttystikk

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
Unclebaldrick said:
Clueless, you are. You don't bother to vote and expect everyone in the country to elect somebody who represents your interests.
Click to expand...
Considering how much you're on my nuts here, I must own a lot of real estate in your head.

Don't forget to breathe...
 
Fogdog

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
ttystikk said:
You're living proof there is no Justice.
Click to expand...
Speaking of Justice Democrats, did you know that of the 1.8 million dollars they spent this year (almost ALL of the cash raised), only $18,000 went into campaigns to help so-called Progressives(TM) win. What good was done with the rest? We ask but you never answer. Why is that? Why are you giving Justice Democrats a free pass when it comes to being corrupt?
 
Padawanbater2

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
Fogdog said:
Speaking of Justice Democrats, did you know that of the 1.8 million dollars they spent this year (almost ALL of the cash raised), only $18,000 went into campaigns to help so-called Progressives(TM) win. What good was done with the rest? We ask but you never answer. Why is that? Why are you giving Justice Democrats a free pass when it comes to being corrupt?
Click to expand...
Interesting. According to you, someone who says it's impossible to win without accepting corporate PAC money, more than 2 dozen candidates who don't accept corporate PAC money have won their primaries by accepting less than $1,000 each from JD...

How's that work?

How'd they win without big money backing them? How'd they win if JD just took the remaining money to pay for staff and administration?

This claim you keep repeating holds no basis in reality. It's a talking point unverified by factual evidence. You're simply too stupid to understand how to read an actual FEC document, and accept the propaganda from the Democratic and Republican establishments as verified facts without actually verifying them for yourself.
 
Fogdog

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
Padawanbater2 said:
Interesting. According to you, someone who says it's impossible to win without accepting corporate PAC money, more than 2 dozen candidates who don't accept corporate PAC money have won their primaries by accepting less than $1,000 each from JD...

How's that work?

How'd they win without big money backing them? How'd they win if JD just took the remaining money to pay for staff and administration?

This claim you keep repeating holds no basis in reality. It's a talking point unverified by factual evidence. You're simply too stupid to understand how to read an actual FEC document, and accept the propaganda from the Democratic and Republican establishments as verified facts without actually verifying them for yourself.
Click to expand...
Interesting attempt at a diversion.

Justice Democrats spent only $18,000 to support Progressive(TM) candidates and 1.8 million -- practically all they raised -- on non-campagn expenses like salaries and consultants.

It is absolutely impossible to win when your leading PAC spends almost nothing on campaigns and everything on themselves. What I don't understand is why you would accept this level of corruption among your own. Terrible example for others from such didactic assholes who demand purity from all others except yourselves..
 
Padawanbater2

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
Fogdog said:
Justice Democrats spent only $18,000 to support Progressive(TM) candidates and 1.8 million -- practically all they raised -- on non-campagn expenses like salaries and consultants.
Click to expand...
You claim candidates can't win unless they take big corporate money. Yet you also claim all the money JD spent went to admin costs and consultants. So how could more than 2 dozen JD/OR candidates win without any money?
Fogdog said:
It is absolutely impossible to win when your leading PAC spends almost nothing on campaigns and everything on themselves.
Click to expand...
Then why have more than half a dozen JD and OR candidates won?
Fogdog said:
What I don't understand is why you would accept this level of corruption among your own. Terrible example for others from such didactic assholes who demand purity from all others except yourselves..
Click to expand...
The only "purity test" I have is that political candidates don't accept corporate PAC money
 
Unclebaldrick

Unclebaldrick

Well-Known Member
Padawanbater2 said:
You claim candidates can't win unless they take big corporate money. Yet you also claim all the money JD spent went to admin costs and consultants. So how could more than 2 dozen JD/OR candidates win without any money?

Then why have more than half a dozen JD and OR candidates won?

The only "purity test" I have is that political candidates don't accept corporate PAC money
Click to expand...
By running in a naturally liberal district. Try that in a red state. Can you show me so.e of the successes JDs have had in red states?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top