Trump nominates Brett Kavanaugh to replace Anthony Kennedy on the Supreme Court

Unclebaldrick

Unclebaldrick

Well-Known Member
Fogdog said:
Most are primaries against other liberals in liberal districtts for local and state offices. Given the thousands of races this year 2 dozen is hardly something to be excited about. For national office, Progressives(TM) endorsed by Our Revolution's who won their primaries number at 8. 210 seats to go for a majority.

They won primaries in liberal districts. Ocasio-Cortez for example won in a safe Democratic district. Before you start crowing, start winning against Republicans in conservative districts as Democrats from the productive wing of the party have done and are set to do in the fall.

We need to win more than 218 seats. Progressives(TM) and the 8 or fewer seats they hold will be a welcome but small group in the Democratc caucus.
Click to expand...
Racist!
 
Unclebaldrick

Unclebaldrick

Well-Known Member
schuylaar said:
fail. pinny's been suicidal. We used to PM. He told me a lot of things during that time..things which some may consider disturbing..things that I kept to myself but once you know you might not like him so much.

where is pinny anyway?
Click to expand...
So it's ok that Tty called him a fa**ot, right?

Pinny gets deleted pretty much within a day of coming back. Sometimes it seems to be a function of his own actions and sometimes because your buddy FDS2black ("come back, I miss you") rats him out to the site owner.
 
Fogdog

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
Padawanbater2 said:
Ocasio-Cortez beat Crowley, a 10 term incumbent, as a white male. Crowley won 10 times, yet OC comes in and steals it from him and all of a sudden it's a "diverse district"? She even won the fucking white vote, 57%. Fuck yourself

She didn't win cuz she was latina, racist, she won because her platform was better than the establishments

Lee Carter in Virginia
Randall Woodfin in Birmingham, Virginia
Brent Welder in Nebraska is poised to win
O'Rourke in Texas has a good chance of beating Cruz
Nixon in New York has a good chance of beating Cuomo

Want more?
Click to expand...
Yeah, I'd like to hear more. For one, your list is a mix of people who are and are not endorsed by "Our Revolution". Are you saying they are irrelevant now and you can just make up who is a Progressive(TM)?

Let me hear you name all 218 Progressives(TM), by the way. Near as I can tell, you might get all the way to 8 endorsed Our Revolution Candidates. Who are the other 210?

And, you are dreaming about Nixon and O'Rouke.

Republicans are going to show up in strong numbers in the fall. I don't know why you want to hurt the chances of displacing them in Congress by your smear tactics against good Democratic Party candidates. All you are doing is helping Trump.
 
ttystikk

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
Isn’t name calling the sign of an intolerant liberal?

Your name calling of pinworm using a bigoted slur made him suicidal
Click to expand...
Amazing projection. Funny that he didn't mention how he used the term first, multiple times.

Care to explain that?

And when you're done, maybe you can explain the amazing power you say I have over people I barely know?!

Utter failure, Buckwit. Reeks of desperation.
 
Last edited:
ttystikk

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
zeddd said:
You are a bona fide example of too stupid to realise his own stupidity, it’s quite rare amongst those who know how to log on. You post garbage written by incoherent jingle mongers, rather like yourself recently.
Click to expand...
Oh look, another stain of verbal diarrhea, signifying nothing.

At least we know what you're good at.
 
ttystikk

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
INF Flux said:
I like how willfully ignorant followers of con artists always try to insult non-believers intelligence, as if following the con somehow makes them smarter.
Click to expand...
Following the con artist doesn't take any mental effort. It's been the easy way out for the intellectually lazy and deficient ever since civilisation began.
 
ttystikk

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
Fogdog said:
Most are primaries against other liberals in liberal districtts for local and state offices. Given the thousands of races this year 2 dozen is hardly something to be excited about. For national office, Progressives(TM) endorsed by Our Revolution's who won their primaries number at 8. 210 seats to go for a majority.

They won primaries in liberal districts. Ocasio-Cortez for example won in a safe Democratic district. Before you start crowing, start winning against Republicans in conservative districts as Democrats from the productive wing of the party have done and are set to do in the fall.

We need to win more than 218 seats. Progressives(TM) and the 8 or fewer seats they hold will be a welcome but small group in the Democratc caucus.
Click to expand...
I'd call it welcome progress. You're the one who's so clearly threatened.
 
ttystikk

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
Unclebaldrick said:
So it's ok that Tty called him a fa**ot, right?

Pinny gets deleted pretty much within a day of coming back. Sometimes it seems to be a function of his own actions and sometimes because your buddy FDS2black ("come back, I miss you") rats him out to the site owner.
Click to expand...
A little to the left, you missed a spot.

They're still dirty from when he used you.
 
Fogdog

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
ttystikk said:
I'd call it welcome progress. You're the one who's so clearly threatened.
Click to expand...
I'm happy with more progressives Congress, even if they are Progressives(TM). What I wish you Progressives(TM) would stop doing is carrying right wing's propaganda messages to suppress the vote for Democrats.
 
ttystikk

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
Fogdog said:
I'm happy with more progressives Congress, even if they are Progressives(TM). What I wish you Progressives(TM) would stop doing is carrying right wing's propaganda messages to suppress the vote for Democrats.
Click to expand...
The Democrats are the ones desperately trying to suppress a movement that would help them return to plurality.

Why haven't you wondered what's up with that?

Maybe it's because the apparatchiks in the DCCC and elsewhere in the party know they'd lose their gravy train?
 
Fogdog

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
ttystikk said:
The Democrats are the ones desperately trying to suppress a movement that would help them return to plurality.

Why haven't you wondered what's up with that?

Maybe it's because the apparatchiks in the DCCC and elsewhere in the party know they'd lose their gravy train?
Click to expand...
The DCCC spent almost all of its millions campaigning against Republicans. What did Our Revolution do for the people it endorsed? We already know that Justice Democrats just took donations and handed it themselves.

Democratic party primaries this year were virtually entirely funded by donations from individuals. Of the PACs that contributed, most were unions and concerned citizen PACs.

There are no cases where the DCCC suppressed Progressive(TM) candidates.
 
ttystikk

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
Fogdog said:
The DCCC spent almost all of its millions campaigning against Republicans. What did Our Revolution do for the people it endorsed? We already know that Justice Democrats just took donations and handed it themselves.

Democratic party primaries this year were virtually entirely funded by donations from individuals. Of the PACs that contributed, most were unions and concerned citizen PACs.

There are no cases where the DCCC suppressed Progressive(TM) candidates.
Click to expand...
Funny how they spend money against Progressives, then?
 
londonfog

londonfog

Well-Known Member
Fogdog said:
So, give me an example of this "Money Spent Against Progressives(TM) to Suppress" you talk about? How much, who, why is it called suppression?
Click to expand...
I think I might see if I can find some recipes for crickets. That question will provide plenty of fresh meat
 
Fogdog

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
londonfog said:
it is fair. I would think he would have an answer already, maybe he had has to still do his "homework"
Click to expand...
@ttystikk , which Progressive(TM) candidates were suppressed by DCCC spending? How much was spent and what did they spend it on?

Democratic Congressional Campaign Cmte
Outside Spending Summary 2018
Total Independent Expenditures: $11,237,553
For Democrats: $789,613
Against Democrats: $0
For Republicans: $137,052
Against Republicans: $10,540,157
Total Electioneering Communications: $0

Based on data released daily by the FEC on July 09, 2018.

https://www.opensecrets.org/outsidespending/detail.php?cmte=C00000935
 
ttystikk

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
Fogdog said:
@ttystikk , which Progressive(TM) candidates were suppressed by DCCC spending? How much was spent and what did they spend it on?

Democratic Congressional Campaign Cmte
Outside Spending Summary 2018
Total Independent Expenditures: $11,237,553
For Democrats: $789,613
Against Democrats: $0
For Republicans: $137,052
Against Republicans: $10,540,157
Total Electioneering Communications: $0

Based on data released daily by the FEC on July 09, 2018.

https://www.opensecrets.org/outsidespending/detail.php?cmte=C00000935
Click to expand...
Lol

Where did you get that?

And why would you believe it?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top