Civil Discourse

Status
Not open for further replies.

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
hmmm, that's not quite how I took it. I "think" he's saying he wont eat food from some nut who may taint it with...well...maybe their taint? :spew:














Oh no. I just disagreed with UB. :shock:
Fuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuck. My life is over.;)
One argument bigots like to use when arguing in bad faith is “why would gay people want a wedding cake from people who don’t like them?”

It is their way of justifying bigoted denial of service while trying to sound like they are on the side of the gay people they are bigoted against

It is no different than the argument racists use about denying service to black people, citing that forcing businesses to serve black people would just make them more bitter, and food might get spat on

I like to ignore the feelings of the bigots and argue that no citizen should face denial of service for their skin color or sexual orientation

We tried that before 1964 and it was disastrous
 

Bugeye

Well-Known Member
Then why did you mention the farcical “religious liberty” argument which is used by bigots to deny service to gay people and by racists to deny service to black people?
Here is something that helps me when I get the grumpies. Enjoy!

 

Bugeye

Well-Known Member
I was under the impression that the Supreme Court just made a ruling in regards to this topic. Feel free to provide me with more details.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
I was under the impression that the Supreme Court just made a ruling in regards to this topic. Feel free to provide me with more details.
Wasn’t the swing vote on that made by the father of the guy who lent trump money when no other American bank would?

And wasn’t one of the other justices appointed illegitimately?

We cannot accept rulings from compromised and illegitimate courts
 

Bugeye

Well-Known Member
Wasn’t the swing vote on that made by the father of the guy who lent trump money when no other American bank would?

And wasn’t one of the other justices appointed illegitimately?

We cannot accept rulings from compromised and illegitimate courts
Oh :roll: I stand corrected.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Oh :roll: I stand corrected.
What if Ginsburg was the swing vote and after a string of 5-4 decisions we found out her daughter lent Hillary clinton money at the height of the recession when no other bank would?

I’m sure you’d be fine with that, right?

Also, you are being uncivil again. Please be civil
 

Tangerine_

Well-Known Member
One argument bigots like to use when arguing in bad faith is “why would gay people want a wedding cake from people who don’t like them?”

It is their way of justifying bigoted denial of service while trying to sound like they are on the side of the gay people they are bigoted against

It is no different than the argument racists use about denying service to black people, citing that forcing businesses to serve black people would just make them more bitter, and food might get spat on

I like to ignore the feelings of the bigots and argue that no citizen should face denial of service for their skin color or sexual orientation

We tried that before 1964 and it was disastrous
I'm with you on all of that and I can spot a homophobe a mile away. I just read his comment a little differently.
And, I've personally heard and witnessed those same arguments. It wasn't that long ago that barbers took issue with cutting "injun" hair. (NO INDIAN) signs were a common thing here that I remember well...and I graduated in the 90s so I'm not talkin 60 yrs ago.
No one seemed to give a sweet fuck either.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
I'm with you on all of that and I can spot a homophobe a mile away. I just read his comment a little differently.
And, I've personally heard and witnessed those same arguments. It wasn't that long ago that barbers took issue with cutting "injun" hair. (NO INDIAN) signs were a common thing here that I remember well...and I graduated in the 90s so I'm not talkin 60 yrs ago.
No one seemed to give a sweet fuck either.
It’s wise not to take anything bugeye writes too seriously, he is a known bigot who argues in bad faith and insincerely. Picture a kid with his finger one inch from his sisters face saying “I’m not touching you”

That’s basically his argument style
 

Tangerine_

Well-Known Member
It’s wise not to take anything bugeye writes too seriously, he is a known bigot who argues in bad faith and insincerely. Picture a kid with his finger one inch from his sisters face saying “I’m not touching you”

That’s basically his argument style
lol, gotcha.
I guess I never noticed.
 

Bugeye

Well-Known Member
What if Ginsburg was the swing vote and after a string of 5-4 decisions we found out her daughter lent Hillary clinton money at the height of the recession when no other bank would?

I’m sure you’d be fine with that, right?

Also, you are being uncivil again. Please be civil
Why should I care about how Ginsburg directs her money? I'm not recalling whatever event you are referencing.
 

Budley Doright

Well-Known Member
What happened with rm3 was real life bleeding over to virtual. Dr. Who sided with him without facts. I admitted what I had done. They did not.

I talk to many members here every day. No one thinks I am a psycho. I have made plans to meet a few even. And no one seems very friendly with any of the people that are trolling with me here.

And they are wrong to insult my wife. And wrong about her. And me.
Well no not psycho, that’s really harsh. I think you do have some issues though lol. All these people that have wronged you have now taken over your mind, let it go man, just let it go. It’ll get better, shut down your “experiment” before it engulfs you ........ 06B71D75-07DD-4232-82A4-02EDD0F98361.jpeg
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Why should I care about how Ginsburg directs her money? I'm not recalling whatever event you are referencing.
Am I supposed to believe you would not care about a scandal like that if it happened under clinton rather than trump, especially after you were duped and fell for every single imaginary and fabricated scandal a Russian bot could invent?
 

Bugeye

Well-Known Member
Am I supposed to believe you would not care about a scandal like that if it happened under clinton rather than trump, especially after you were duped and fell for every single imaginary and fabricated scandal a Russian bot could invent?
Was it an illegal transaction?
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Was it an illegal transaction?
Why do you have one set of standards for actual conflicts of interest and corruption for trump, yet a completely different set when it comes to imaginary scandals made up about Hillary clinton?

Were you aware that we can all see your obvious partisan leanings and desperation to excuse the guy who called nazis very fine people?
 

MichiganMedGrower

Well-Known Member
Well no not psycho, that’s really harsh. I think you do have some issues though lol. All these people that have wronged you have now taken over your mind, let it go man, just let it go. It’ll get better, shut down your “experiment” before it engulfs you ........ View attachment 4187541

Nothing has engulfed me here. I have been busy all day. They are still posting and talking about me.

No one wronged me. Someone mentioned did wrong my friend and then got unreasonably mad at me for saying something about it on his website.

I didn’t cross any lines here. They did.
 

MichiganMedGrower

Well-Known Member
It’s wise not to take anything bugeye writes too seriously, he is a known bigot who argues in bad faith and insincerely. Picture a kid with his finger one inch from his sisters face saying “I’m not touching you”

That’s basically his argument style

This is what you do. Not bugeye.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top