I read the link before I responded to you. That's why I said ''I contemplated'' what you said in the following posts. As I continued to point out with various questions, the issue I have is your interpretation of the facts provided by the link. Judging by the amount of likes the post got then others clearly see the same contradictions. So either I and they are wrong (very possible) and you need to elaborate on the questions I asked so we can learn why, or, you have indeed misinterpreted the facts you draw from. If you are right and I have misunderstood your points, then I apologise, again. But we are not going to get to that point unless you put down some answers.
You are the only person around here I end up becoming toxic with, think about that. I only post for factual advice too or from, could not give a flying fuck about rep.
I never have a cycle renewal with ought a change of some sort, even if it's a small logistical change for lower labour requirement. So with that, no, I have not got blinkers on when it comes to learning.
I've been here a while but I don't think of myself as a senior or highly experienced. At the same time, I can offer good enough advice (usually first hand) so that anybody with less experience than me will benefit, that's what knowledge is for. The longer this goes on, your refusal to answer specifics, the more it appears you actually don't know anything. But notice how even now, after months of you making claims then hiding from specifics, I'm still trying to get you to elaborate. That's because maybe you do have something to learn me?..
Honestly, no toxicity meant here, I don't think I've learned anything from you. That's not a bias issue since other posters around here in the past who I don't like (no names required) have still learnt me something.. as I said, it's not about ''rep''. I do genuinely wish you'd stop being a prick and start answering and elaborating on things.
