So the science jsnt implrtant and leds dont base everything on them...?
Who.needs to use leds to clearly see their claims have never stacked up and they are still struggling with spectrum?
I mean wouldnt it be obvious if leds were what these fools say but no i guess you need crayon diagrams and pics before you attempt the science.
Pretty well educated here so i can nust beat down with words but how the fuck am i such a long term poster with no grow over many years mr science guy.
You get shit right and we will go back to what i did best before all tbis bs industry fucked what were harcore knowledgable grow sites....
Deal or you just wanna troll? Personally few have hit a level.of grow id be imoressed with and rooms of plants dont mean much, take one plant and detail that as i have done a hundred times....
I never mentioned "science", you did. I asked you nicely for it beforehand and you ignored the request.
Have you used led before?
Air-conditioning isn't a luxury i personally have. Went with hps myself after using led, because i was using extra watts to heat my space. Hps i don't, for the same amount of energy. Fyi it's still too hot most summer without aircon regardless.
Power is 37c/kwh for me, saves me hundreds a bill. If I was using aircon during summer, it would only add up to more.
Most LED's have a heat sink as well.
You make bold claims and mention science, so where is the data? Studies, watt for watt comparisons, temps, operating temperature, PAR output etc.
I have none of this, only what i've experienced first hand. So i'm politely asking you to show the science, because you made me curious when you mentioned it, and I thought i might learn something new.
Every grower's needs are different, light included.