Pandemic 2020

Status
Not open for further replies.

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
Trump says he couldn't have exposed WWII vets to COVID-19 because the wind was blowing the wrong way ... WTF ?

View attachment 4560160


President Trump commemorated the 75th anniversary of VE Day on Friday with eight World War II veterans, the youngest of whom was 96 and the oldest of whom was 100, CBS News reports. The president, however, did not wear a mask around the veterans despite the CDC's warning that anyone over the age of 65 is at a higher risk for severe illness if they catch COVID-19.

Trump, notably, could have been exposed to the virus by one of his personal valets, who tested positive for COVID-19 this week and potentially wasn't wearing a maskwhen he interacted with the president. Asked if Trump gave "any consideration to wearing a mask" with the veterans "given that his valet just tested positive," White House Press Secretary Kayleigh McEnany said Friday that Trump is "regularly tested." She added that the veterans "made the choice" to attend the ceremony "because they've chosen to put their nation first. They wanted to be with their commander-in-chief on this momentous day. And it was there choice to come here."

Please for the love of god , get this piece of shit out .
it's okay, just drink a bleach shooter and you'll be good to go!
 

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
Yep, we are trying to do the right thing up here, but are gonna get economically hammered along with the USA. The American economy going tits up because of Trump's failed premature restarts, mismanagement and stupidity is gonna hurt your largest trading partner too. I expect they will pull back in a few weeks or sooner when the body count goes through the roof in the red states who drank Trump's Koolaid. I wonder if he's gonna try to hold red state rallies again? He's stupid enough for anything and already he's doing a Jim Jones on his cult by killing off the morons in red states, along with the innocent who are forced back to work. The GOP governors and senators from those states will be freaking as the body count rises and local panic sets in with hospitals overflowing.
well we still have two choices.
 

Dr.Amber Trichome

Well-Known Member
I’m not doing it unless it’s free.l

FDA publishes first validation results of 12 COVID-19 antibody tests

The FDA published results from the first batch of COVID-19 antibody diagnostics to have their accuracy independently evaluated by federal laboratories—starting with the 12 blood tests the agency has already authorized for emergency use against the pandemic.


The data illustrates each test’s approximate ability to avoid false-positive and false-negative results, known as specificity and sensitivity, as well as their overall predictive value—essentially, how much a clinician could trust the likelihood of a correct reading when discussing the results with a patient, based on the test’s performance as well as the estimated prevalence of the novel coronavirus throughout the community.

The validation work is part of a project launched last month in collaboration with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the National Institutes of Health, and the results come just days after the agency clamped down on the broad marketing of antibody tests across the country.


Conducted by the National Cancer Institute’s Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, the test data was also used by the FDA as it decided whether to grant the products a green light. In addition, the FDA last month issued a broad authorization for antibody tests that are voluntarily submitted and pass review by the program.

EUA Authorized Serology Test Performance
i will talk to my doctor about it .
I wasn’t able to get any information yesterday from the Lab. I am not paying for it so until they change if to free I am not interested at all. Hopefully the vaccine will come out soon and put this shit behind me.
 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
So I'm assuming then that you don't put your trust in a President who flies off the handle on Twitter, calling people "Loser" among other derogatory names like a 12 year old, takes no responsibility, refuses any oversight while his own companies scam the taxpayer, and asks whether if UV light and disinfectants put into the human body will eradicate a virus.
Looks like your wife can double dip, pick up so of uncle sam's cash
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Dual Canadian-U.S. citizens qualify for Trump's COVID-19 emergency payments

Dual citizens in Canada can earn almost $150,000 more than U.S. residents and still get full benefit

Millions of dollars in U.S. pandemic stimulus payments could find their way into Canada in the coming weeks and months.

Canadians with U.S. citizenship, who may not have paid taxes in the U.S. for decades, still qualify for the Trump administration's one-time pandemic support payment.

In order to get the payment, Canadians with dual U.S. citizenship and U.S. citizens living and working in Canada must have filed a tax return with the Internal Revenue Service for 2018 or 2019 reporting their global income.

In some cases, people who qualify for the payment can also get the full U.S. COVID-19 benefit payment while earning substantially more per year than they would if they lived in the United States because of special tax exemptions only available to American ex-pats.

Democrats Abroad, a Canadian-based group that helps Americans vote, file taxes and stay informed while living abroad, held a seminar last month explaining how its members could apply for the payment.

"Most of them are surprised, really surprised about it, because … there are people who've been here 40 years and they've never gotten a cent from the U.S. government, except some who get U.S. social security cheques, and they aren't many — and now all of a sudden they are getting $1,600," said Ed Ungar, co-vice chair of Democrats Abroad.

"They are really happy to get it, but it wasn't something they counted on."

Ungar said he does not know of anyone who has received the payment but said most of the people he's spoken to are convinced the payment will arrive within six months.

In the U.S., many Americans who have their banking details on file with the IRS already have received their payments. Many of those who don't are still waiting for their cheques.

The problem for many dual citizens in Canada is that while many have been filing their taxes with the IRS for years, there is no bank account attached to their filings because they have not had to pay penalties or receive payments.

Without a U.S.-based bank account, Canadians with dual citizenship and Americans living and working here don't have a way to receive an electronic payment. They have to wait for cheques to be sent out to the addresses on their last income tax filings.

Filing worldwide income to the IRS
U.S. citizens living abroad who wish to retain their American citizenship are required to file a U.S. tax return every year detailing their worldwide income.

If it's determined that the U.S. citizen paid lower taxes abroad than they would have if they had earned the same income in the U.S., they are required to pay the difference to the IRS.

The IRS's economic impact payment, EIP, is similar to the Canada emergency response benefit, CERB — a cash payment offered to citizens across the country who are struggling financially because of the pandemic.

Canadians who qualify for the CERB can claim it for a maximum of four four-week periods. The EIP is a one-time payment.

To qualify for the full EIP of $1,200 US, ($1,687 Cdn), plus an additional $500 US ($702) for each qualifying child, U.S. citizens can earn a maximum of $75,000 US ($105,400) as an individual, or $112,500 US ($158,100) if they are the head of a single-income family.

Married couples with joint earnings of no more than $150,000 US ($210,800) qualify for a joint benefit of $2,400 UD ($3,374).

A major difference between the Canadian and American pandemic benefits is that in Canada, people must apply to receive it, but in the U.S. the payment is automatically dispersed, providing the person filed a tax return in 2018 or 2019.

The U.S. EIP maximum payment is gradually reduced after people reach their maximum amount of earned income until the benefit is cut off at $99,000 US ($139,200) for individuals, at $136,500 US ($192,000) for single-income families and $198,000 US ($278,300) for families with two incomes.

Earning more in Canada
The major difference when it comes to U.S. citizens living abroad is that they are allowed to exempt up to $103,900 US ($146,000) of income from their 2018 tax filing, or $105,900 US ($149,000) of income from their 2019 return.

"Somebody living outside the U.S. would actually ... earn more income than somebody living in the U.S. and be eligible to receive that benefit because of this Foreign Earned Income Exclusion," said Kevin Kirkpatrick, a U.S. tax lawyer with the international firm Moody's.

In some cases, the Foreign Earned Income Exclusion can effectively lower a person's income to the level where they can still receive the benefit.

For example, in 2018 an individual U.S. citizen living in Canada could have earned $250,000 Cdn while still qualifying for the full EIP — but if they lived in the U.S. they could have earned a maximum of about $105,000 while getting the same benefit.

CBC has requested information from the IRS and the U.S. embassy in Ottawa on how many U.S. citizens live in Canada and file U.S. tax returns, but neither agency was able to provide that information.

Several follow up questions to both the embassy and the IRS were not returned by the time of publication.

According to the 2016 census, 377,410 people in Canada identified themselves as being either fully or partly of American origin.
 

spek9

Well-Known Member
Looks like your wife can double dip, pick up so of uncle sam's cash
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Dual Canadian-U.S. citizens qualify for Trump's COVID-19 emergency payments

Dual citizens in Canada can earn almost $150,000 more than U.S. residents and still get full benefit

Millions of dollars in U.S. pandemic stimulus payments could find their way into Canada in the coming weeks and months.

Canadians with U.S. citizenship, who may not have paid taxes in the U.S. for decades, still qualify for the Trump administration's one-time pandemic support payment.

In order to get the payment, Canadians with dual U.S. citizenship and U.S. citizens living and working in Canada must have filed a tax return with the Internal Revenue Service for 2018 or 2019 reporting their global income.

In some cases, people who qualify for the payment can also get the full U.S. COVID-19 benefit payment while earning substantially more per year than they would if they lived in the United States because of special tax exemptions only available to American ex-pats.

Democrats Abroad, a Canadian-based group that helps Americans vote, file taxes and stay informed while living abroad, held a seminar last month explaining how its members could apply for the payment.

"Most of them are surprised, really surprised about it, because … there are people who've been here 40 years and they've never gotten a cent from the U.S. government, except some who get U.S. social security cheques, and they aren't many — and now all of a sudden they are getting $1,600," said Ed Ungar, co-vice chair of Democrats Abroad.

"They are really happy to get it, but it wasn't something they counted on."

Ungar said he does not know of anyone who has received the payment but said most of the people he's spoken to are convinced the payment will arrive within six months.

In the U.S., many Americans who have their banking details on file with the IRS already have received their payments. Many of those who don't are still waiting for their cheques.

The problem for many dual citizens in Canada is that while many have been filing their taxes with the IRS for years, there is no bank account attached to their filings because they have not had to pay penalties or receive payments.

Without a U.S.-based bank account, Canadians with dual citizenship and Americans living and working here don't have a way to receive an electronic payment. They have to wait for cheques to be sent out to the addresses on their last income tax filings.

Filing worldwide income to the IRS
U.S. citizens living abroad who wish to retain their American citizenship are required to file a U.S. tax return every year detailing their worldwide income.

If it's determined that the U.S. citizen paid lower taxes abroad than they would have if they had earned the same income in the U.S., they are required to pay the difference to the IRS.

The IRS's economic impact payment, EIP, is similar to the Canada emergency response benefit, CERB — a cash payment offered to citizens across the country who are struggling financially because of the pandemic.

Canadians who qualify for the CERB can claim it for a maximum of four four-week periods. The EIP is a one-time payment.

To qualify for the full EIP of $1,200 US, ($1,687 Cdn), plus an additional $500 US ($702) for each qualifying child, U.S. citizens can earn a maximum of $75,000 US ($105,400) as an individual, or $112,500 US ($158,100) if they are the head of a single-income family.

Married couples with joint earnings of no more than $150,000 US ($210,800) qualify for a joint benefit of $2,400 UD ($3,374).

A major difference between the Canadian and American pandemic benefits is that in Canada, people must apply to receive it, but in the U.S. the payment is automatically dispersed, providing the person filed a tax return in 2018 or 2019.

The U.S. EIP maximum payment is gradually reduced after people reach their maximum amount of earned income until the benefit is cut off at $99,000 US ($139,200) for individuals, at $136,500 US ($192,000) for single-income families and $198,000 US ($278,300) for families with two incomes.

Earning more in Canada
The major difference when it comes to U.S. citizens living abroad is that they are allowed to exempt up to $103,900 US ($146,000) of income from their 2018 tax filing, or $105,900 US ($149,000) of income from their 2019 return.

"Somebody living outside the U.S. would actually ... earn more income than somebody living in the U.S. and be eligible to receive that benefit because of this Foreign Earned Income Exclusion," said Kevin Kirkpatrick, a U.S. tax lawyer with the international firm Moody's.

In some cases, the Foreign Earned Income Exclusion can effectively lower a person's income to the level where they can still receive the benefit.

For example, in 2018 an individual U.S. citizen living in Canada could have earned $250,000 Cdn while still qualifying for the full EIP — but if they lived in the U.S. they could have earned a maximum of about $105,000 while getting the same benefit.

CBC has requested information from the IRS and the U.S. embassy in Ottawa on how many U.S. citizens live in Canada and file U.S. tax returns, but neither agency was able to provide that information.

Several follow up questions to both the embassy and the IRS were not returned by the time of publication.

According to the 2016 census, 377,410 people in Canada identified themselves as being either fully or partly of American origin.
Thanks for this, very informative!

Because I already do contracts in the US, I've got a tax attorney who handles most of the cross-border stuff (so I don't get over-taxed, or worse, taxed by both countries), and he's already aware that we're interested in him sorting out any ways we can benefit from this whole fiasco, so it's been in the works for some time now.

Although in my lines of work I'm more sheltered than most (I've worked out of my home office for years now, and client face-to-face meetings don't happen very often), but it has taken a decent hit on revenues coming in. Still enough to cover all expenses without spending capital, but that won't be sustainable forever.
 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
I’m not doing it unless it’s free.l

i will talk to my doctor about it .
I wasn’t able to get any information yesterday from the Lab. I am not paying for it so until they change if to free I am not interested at all. Hopefully the vaccine will come out soon and put this shit behind me.
A vaccine is a year away at best, treatment options are already taking a bite out of this bug and will continue to do so over the summer. I'm hoping mortality rates (.5% now) will be a fraction of what they are now by fall when antibody therapies will become available to drive it down further. I've got more faith in convalescent plasma therapy than remdesivir though everything helps including blood thinners. Studies should be released with in a month on plasma therapy and depending on results you could see a big drive on for it, they are already preparing.

Someone like you dying from this bug will be greatly diminished over the next couple of months as treatments are rolled out, that's my hope anyway, we will see over the next several weeks.

Good luck, with effective treatments your fear level will be reduced, things won't go back to "normal" for a long time and they will be hard times until they do.
 

Dr.Amber Trichome

Well-Known Member
A vaccine is a year away at best, treatment options are already taking a bite out of this bug and will continue to do so over the summer. I'm hoping mortality rates (.5% now) will be a fraction of what they are now by fall when antibody therapies will become available to drive it down further. I've got more faith in convalescent plasma therapy than remdesivir though everything helps including blood thinners. Studies should be released with in a month on plasma therapy and depending on results you could see a big drive on for it, they are already preparing.

Someone like you dying from this bug will be greatly diminished over the next couple of months as treatments are rolled out, that's my hope anyway, we will see over the next several weeks.

Good luck, with effective treatments your fear level will be reduced, things won't go back to "normal" for a long time and they will be hard times until they do.
Yeah I know . That’s why I am planning on moving to a small town in Montana, Wyoming, Idaho, Colorado in the next few months.
 

Dr.Amber Trichome

Well-Known Member
Go where it's legal to grow, Colorado seems to suit you! I live in a small town, way better quality of life than a city, clean air and great water.
Yeah that’s where I’m looking right now.
they said on the radio this morning that Covid-19 can be transmitted via farts. But underwear and pants will contain it so try to steer clear of naked assholes if you can.
 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
Now this looks interesting, I wonder if they will kiss and make up, or will Trump oppose his bid for the senate by supporting a competitor and make an opening for the democratic incumbent? Jeff still supports Trump though, even though he shits on him more than the WH toilet.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Sessions responds to Trump attack: 'I do not and will not break the law'

Washington (CNN)Former Trump-appointed Attorney General Jeff Sessions on Friday defended his 2017 decision to recuse himself from the Russia investigation, after President Donald Trump attacked Sessions for not "being a man" and quashing the probe.
Sessions said in a statement that he recused himself because he was abiding by the law.

"To not recuse myself from that investigation, of which I was a target as a senior campaign official and a witness, would have been breaking the law. I do not and will not break the law," Sessions. "I did the right thing for the country and for President Trump. If I, as a target of the investigation, had broken the law by not recusing myself, it would have been a catastrophe for the rule of law and for the President."
Sessions became a source of Trump's public frustration when in early 2017 the then-attorney general recused himself from the Russia investigation. His recusal came after it was publicly revealed that he didn't disclose at his Senate confirmation hearing two pre-election meetings with Russia's then-ambassador to the US, Sergey Kislyak.


Trump told "Fox and Friends" Friday morning that he felt obligated to appoint Sessions to the job, calling him "very weak and very sad."
The President was asked during a Friday morning call to "Fox & Friends" if there would have been a Russia probe had Bill Barr, the current attorney general, been attorney general during the start of the Trump administration.
"No, there wouldn't be. He would have stopped it immediately. ... Jeff Sessions was a disaster. I made him -- I didn't want to make him attorney general but he was the first senator to endorse me so I felt a little bit of an obligation," Trump said.

Trump added that Sessions "came to see me four times, just begging me to be attorney general. He wasn't, you know, to me, equipped to be attorney general. But he wanted and wanted and wanted it."

Sessions said in his statement that he continues to support Trump and will vote for him in the fall, but he said he "never begged for the job of Attorney General, not 4 times, not 1 time, not ever."

On "Fox and Friends," Trump said of Sessions, "He goes in -- he was so bad in his nomination proceedings. I should have gotten rid of him there," adding that he "knew less about Russia than I did."

"But they got him standing on a line with Kislyak ... everyone in Washington knew Kislyak," he remarked.

"Instead of being a man and saying 'this is a hoax,' he recused himself," the President added, even though such an action by Sessions could have amounted to obstruction of justice. During the Russia investigation, Trump tried to get Sessions to curtail the probe, which special counsel Robert Mueller later said checked all the boxes for obstruction.

While past US presidents have largely left the Justice Department and, within it, the FBI, to be independent, Trump has said he has seen himself as the country's "chief law enforcement officer" -- a title typically used to refer to the attorney general.
Barr's Justice Department has acted more as an arm of Trump's defense than an independent arbiter of justice.

The current attorney general has disagreed with his own agency's watchdog report saying that Russia probe was justified. He has defended the removal of the intelligence community inspector general who notified Congress of the existence of a whistleblower complaint about Trump pressuring the Ukrainian President for political help. And most recently, he said the Justice Department had a "duty" to move to dismiss charges against Trump's first national security adviser, Michael Flynn, for lying to the FBI.

The request to drop the case drew criticism from former top FBI officials who had worked on the case. And former federal prosecutor Elie Honig told CNN Thursday that he had never seen such a flagrant political act by the Justice Department.

"The fix is in," said Honig, a legal analyst for CNN.

"This is an absolute injustice. Michael Flynn lied to the FBI, he pled guilty under oath in federal court to doing that, he took a plea, and then what does Bill Barr do? He says of all the tens of thousands of cases he's been in charge of in the Department of Justice, look at that one," Honig said. "And now we see Bill Barr doing Donald Trump's dirty work."
 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
Yeah that’s where I’m looking right now.
they said on the radio this morning that Covid-19 can be transmitted via farts. But underwear and pants will contain it so try to steer clear of naked assholes if you can.
If the smell don't get ya the virus will! If ya can smell it, it can infect ya is my rule of thumb... Who knew a can of beans and bad manners could be lethal. :D
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
Yeah I know . That’s why I am planning on moving to a small town in Montana, Wyoming, Idaho, Colorado in the next few months.
Wouldn't you be moving right into where the next large wave of infections are already starting to show? Those states are full of exactly the kind of right wing Luddite who can be depended upon to do the wrong things. That said, you could pick worse places to live so long as you don't have high expectations for an enlightened community.

I lived in Idaho for about 10 years. Loved the place. Loved the people though they are backward in many ways and very conservative.

Personally, I wouldn't live in a small town anywhere in Idaho, especially the lower eastern quadrant because those areas are dominated by Mormons. Still, though, if small towns with decent medical infrastructure is your objective, Cottonwood and Grangeville are nice.

Avoid: Lewiston (!!!!), Twin Falls, Idaho Falls, Pocatello, Nampa, Weiser, Moscow

Might be good: Cascade, Sun Valley, Coer d'Alene.

Boise was my home town when I lived there. Wonderful place, IMO. Very conservative compared to Western Oregon but it is Idaho's most liberal "city" (there are no large cities in Idaho). My sister in law was a nurse in the oncology department in Boise's hospital downtown and she really liked working there. Boise might be larger than you are looking for, the metropolitan area sprawls across several towns and cities with an overall population of about 400,000.

Two quotes that stick in my mind from my days there:

"if salmon were endangered you wouldn't find them in cans in the grocery store"

"if we didn't pay them so much, we wouldn't have so many of them"
(a congresswoman from central Idaho said that about Idaho's state employees, about half of whom were paid so little that they qualified for food stamps).

Butch Otter is governor (yuck)
 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member

Global report: Anthony Fauci and two other White House Covid-19 taskforce members to self-quarantine
Fauci and heads of CDC and FDA potentially exposed to coronavirus; Boris Johnson to announce UK lockdown changes

Three members of the White House coronavirus taskforce have placed themselves in self-quarantine after contact with someone who tested positive for Covid-19. It comes as the British prime minister, Boris Johnson, prepares to unveil his “roadmap” to a new normality in a national broadcast and global infections pass four million.

Dr Anthony Fauci, the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Dr Robert Redfield, director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and the commissioner of the Food and Drug Administration, Stephen Hahn, are all expected to work remotely due to potential exposure to Covid-19.

Fauci’s institute said that he has tested negative for Covid-19 and will continue to be tested regularly. It added that he is considered at relatively low risk based on the degree of his exposure, and that he would be taking appropriate precautions to mitigate the risk to personal contacts while still carrying out his duties. While he will stay at home and telework, Fauci will go to the White House if called and take every precaution, the institute said.

Redfield will be teleworking for the next two weeks after it was determined he had a low-risk exposure to a person at the White House, the CDC said in a statement Saturday evening. The statement said he felt fine and has no symptoms.

A few hours earlier, the Food and Drug Administration confirmed that Hahn had come in contact with someone who had tested positive and was in self-quarantine for the next two weeks. He tested negative for the virus.

All three men were scheduled to testify before a Senate committee on Tuesday, and it’s understood they will be allowed to do that via videoconference.

Politico reported Hahn had come into contact with Katie Miller, vice president Mike Pence’s press secretary, who tested positive for the virus on Friday. Her husband, Stephen Miller, is a top advisor to Donald Trump. On Thursday the White House confirmed that a member of the military serving as one of Trump’s valets had also tested positive for Covid-19.

Trump, who publicly identified Miller’s positive test, said he was not worried about the virus spreading in the White House. However, officials said they were stepping up safety protocols.
more...
 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
Here is a bit of prophecy that overlooks a couple of the most likely probabilities. One, that Donald Trump will be reelected, which is possible, but not probable. The second fact is that if he loses in November all Hell will break loose until January 20th, after which he will be quickly indicted on a variety and growing list of charges. A week after he appears before a judge he will have a gag order placed on him and a week later he will be jailed for violating it. I don't think it will be long before individual #1 is charged with the crime his lawyer already did time for and that is just the start.

We will be seeing and hearing about Donald for awhile after he's out of the presidency, but he's not a billionaire, I figure he's broke and is bailing himself out with government money to save Russian investments. That's why the GOP put so much cash in the pot, they couldn't have Donald going bankrupt in the middle of the election. Donald is going to prison and the only TV he's gonna see is the one he'll be watching there. That's why he's so dangerous, he's cornered and the only way out is to win in November and run out the clock, he will do anything to win, he knows what will happen if he does not.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This could be President Trump's next job

President Donald Trump will one day leave the White House, whether it happens in January 2021 or four years from now. But that doesn't mean he'll be leaving the spotlight. Chris Cillizza explains the potential path for Trump after the presidency -- and how it could lead him back to the world of television.
 

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
i predict the DOJ will let Flynn go; stare decisis no longer required..Team Trumpy* will get the 'Rona..but wait a minute..!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top