Nice! I’m a couple weeks out from filling it up again but I made a lot of changes. I have a bunch of f strips I was going to do side lighting but it will just delay me so I’m moving forward with a new DE bulb haha. Will play with some led this winter/spring maybe.
i put that diamond foil in my room prior to this grow and my temps are almost out of control. thankfully the nights are gettin colder here but it was tough going in most of september.
I was checking out the orcha film, went with panda film to replace that reflective funhouse mirror shit i had up. Yeah it’s there newer hps full spectrum. They give specs up to 1150 watts, I will run it at 1100. I have a 600w SE fixture up there too with it, was running a MH with the DE hps last run.
not sure if its still true or not, but it was the only nute that was ever patentedFNB showed up today, not sure why but I’m entertained with it being the heaviest gallon of nutes I ever boughtCan’t wait to try it out.
That’s interesting, will have to do some searching. I’m kinda in the air on this sag garden friendly, last time i loosely ran UC, really nothing, more time not. Availability has me butt hurt. I know you have run sterile before as well, is there a benefit between the 2? It’s the last piece of my puzzle before I crack beans again. I can get pool shock, recharge, I’m guessing sag has label issues keeping it from retail up here. I also vaguely remember 2-5ml of this FNB per gallon or was it 10 gallons. Bottles a crazy amount of 9.5 per gallon in bloom. I will have to go back and look again closer to go time.
I think that this is some marketing BS.
Says right on the website it’s a patented formula. Not that it matters, you know of something comparable, if it’s bs? Someone must of copied it and added that 1mg somewhere.. What nutes would you recommend for Lucas formula?
that's exactly what a patent is for. you can look it up on the US patent website if you'd like.
i'm running @ 30mL per 10 gal which comes out to about 0.8 EC total. well is 0.2
not really a benefit/detriment to either. both work very well. i'd say the only negative to shock is you will need an accurate scale which is an added expense. mine was like $35
OK, maybe I wrote it not correct.
if you just change things slightly, that could be argued in court as a copyright infringement. if i patented a bike rim and you change the color from black to red, i'd sue the crap out of you and win.
Sounds good, I will start low and see where I end up.
Alright, I will have to think about it, I think I have a .00 scale, will have to check.
that's what you need. for my res, i was measuring out 0.3 grams for 10 gallons. it was about 3 shakes of a salt shaker. so accuracy is important
I ran the UC roots on the light side, I’m not sure if it was a waste doing so, water temps were always 64 so I never really had any issues to start with. If I do the pool shock, I think I kept most the info I came across, a lot was from discussions in posts from you as well. I will prob start the bennies or shock afterwards too.
i ran at 3ppm. kinda middle of the road. anywhere from 1 to 5ppm is fine especially if you are just using it as a preventative.
