Texas

TacoMac

Well-Known Member
I’m not 100% I would assume cost and access for repairs or replacement
It's that and to protect union jobs. If the lines are run underground you can get rid of 80% of the unionized electrician workforce, trucks and related equipment that goes along with it.

Efficiency costs jobs. That's why we're the most inefficient nation on earth.
 

Wattzzup

Well-Known Member
It's that and to protect union jobs. If the lines are run underground you can get rid of 80% of the unionized electrician workforce, trucks and related equipment that goes along with it.

Efficiency costs jobs. That's why we're the most inefficient nation on earth.
I don’t agree with that.

Here’s some more info on it. Drilling new lines in, having access to repair, etc. but here’s a main reason


Electricity wires are, by their nature, very warm, as they’re channeling currents to and fro. In the open air, this heat can dissipate, but deep in the soil it can’t. That’s why utilities wrapped their underground wires in plastic and surround them with a conduit like oil to keep things from overheating.
 

Wattzzup

Well-Known Member
Well it’s that and these are places that aren’t built property to deal with this cold as well. Why they don’t have universal codes for freezing there is beyond my comprehension. Another failure by the Texas state govt.
 

TacoMac

Well-Known Member
I don’t agree with that.

Here’s some more info on it. Drilling new lines in, having access to repair, etc. but here’s a main reason


Electricity wires are, by their nature, very warm, as they’re channeling currents to and fro. In the open air, this heat can dissipate, but deep in the soil it can’t. That’s why utilities wrapped their underground wires in plastic and surround them with a conduit like oil to keep things from overheating.
Nearly 50% of Europe's power lines are underground. It's not hard at all to do.

In contrast to that, roughly 25% of ours are underground because we want to milk the taxpayers and customers out of billions of dollars per year in repair and maintenance fees.
 

TacoMac

Well-Known Member
It’s not hard but it would be expensive. Not worth the cost IMO.
That's the entire point:

Is it worth the cost to maintain an aircraft engine every 2 weeks?

Well, no. It isn't. Fact is the majority of crashes are caused by pilot error or hydraulic failure, not engines.

So why bother?

So you don't get sued if it turns out to be the engine that fails.

Yet with power and water that keeps us alive, nobody cares because it's not worth the money.

Edit to add: if California's lines were buried, they wouldn't have half the fires that have cost countless billions of dollars of damage and loss of life.

But it's not worth the costs.
 

TacoMac

Well-Known Member
So we agree?

No one is going to pay to bury lines underground that are functioning perfectly fine above ground.

When they feel it is profitable, it will happen.
No, we don't agree.

Fact is they're paying far more not to bury them in repair cost, lawsuits, damage to property and economy than it would have cost to bury them to begin with and never have that problem.
 

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
that guy is such a piece of shit..where's your bullhorn now?

'Texans want answers and an apology' :lol: yeah right.

personally, they should be cut loose now..want succession..?

i feel not one thing for these people just the animals.
 
Top