captainmorgan
Well-Known Member
I bet if you went through the video of Stinkys rallies you'll find this wack job front and center.
Nashville Tennessee RV terrorist attack.
- Thread starter hanimmal
- Start date
hanimmal
Well-Known Member
I didn't know that the nut Lin Wood was Rittenhouse's lawyer for murdering people.
Fuck Ricky Schroeder too.
hanimmal
Well-Known Member
Trump invited this mob days after this happened on Christmas.
People really need to be widely exposed to the fact that all this radicalization is being done digitally. Q nonsense is really causing problems.
I wish the presentation would talk about how all the violence goes back to a very specific date.
And all summer long (mainly) white males of military age (at least that is what some talking head called it I saw) have been causing violence using the protests as cover.
https://www.rollitup.org/t/the-people-behind-the-violence-in-the-american-protests-of-george-floyd.1018871/post-15693416
People really need to be widely exposed to the fact that all this radicalization is being done digitally. Q nonsense is really causing problems.
I wish the presentation would talk about how all the violence goes back to a very specific date.
And all summer long (mainly) white males of military age (at least that is what some talking head called it I saw) have been causing violence using the protests as cover.
https://www.rollitup.org/t/the-people-behind-the-violence-in-the-american-protests-of-george-floyd.1018871/post-15693416
smokinrav
Well-Known Member
Might be behind a paywall, sorry
The New York Times: Nashville Bomber Anthony Warner Was a Conspiracy Theorist.
www.nytimes.com
The New York Times: Nashville Bomber Anthony Warner Was a Conspiracy Theorist.
Behind the Nashville Bombing, a Conspiracy Theorist Stewing About the Government (Published 2021)
Anthony Warner, who was obsessed with an outlandish tale about lizard aliens and other plots, had been planning for months.
Last edited:
i wish i could read this article but i already received my free one for the year.The New York Times: Nashville Bomber Anthony Warner Was a Conspiracy Theorist.
Behind the Nashville Bombing, a Conspiracy Theorist Stewing About the Government (Published 2021)
Anthony Warner, who was obsessed with an outlandish tale about lizard aliens and other plots, had been planning for months.
'Democracy Dies in Darkness' - WaPo (who gives you one free article per year also)
injinji
Well-Known Member
Even if you search for it with Google?
it's not a complaint for you
we're in February so i've had an occasion to read another Times articles already this year. the Times; not the article. it's a complaint to the powers that be, that there is a poll tax (they got cute and call it a 'pay wall' now) to be educated with what's going on in our country..they should be ashamed because that's where the exorbitant advertising money comes in.why are they charging the reader when i can go online elsewhere but WaPo since they do the same thing?
the advertisers should be pretty mad because the consumer don't see what they paid for.
Last edited:
smokinrav
Well-Known Member
It's all good.
Here's a Daily Beast link
www.thedailybeast.com
Here's a Daily Beast link
Nashville Bomber’s Best Friend Says He Dropped a String of Chilling Clues on Her
Crystal Deck says Anthony Warner told her he was plotting something that could land her in trouble, but she didn’t know the scale of what he had in mind.
hanimmal
Well-Known Member
Ive not heard of this 'one per year' thing, I get a couple free a month.
why are they charging the reader when i can go online elsewhere but WaPo since they do the same thing?
the advertisers should be pretty mad because the consumer don't see what they paid for.
But that is the good thing about AP news and Reuters, you get the highest quality information for free online.
WaPo and NY times are paying professional journalists and research teams to do more than just read articles on AP or other news organizations and spin them to a political slant.
Hollatchaboy
Well-Known Member
Agreed. It's all op-eds now instead of just the facts. That's why you have to pay. To hear someone else's opinion on the facts.
Fogdog
Well-Known Member
"What is Fox News", for $50, Alex.
injinji
Well-Known Member
They have both broke really big stories this past year. It takes time and money to do the deep dives they do. I must not try to read them that often, because I can always find a way to get there if I turn off my adblockerplus. Anyway, who ever wrote it will be on the Newhour talking about it. Maybe Fresh Air too.
topcat
Well-Known Member
Right click mouse, then choose "Open link in incognito window."
smokinrav
Well-Known Member
Thanks, worked
Long press the link to get the drop down box for incognito on touchscreens. Never once used incognito in all these years lol
you do not get three free per month from the NY Times or Washington Post.
one idea is to raise the price of advertising, Hanimmal..you charge those who have the money so the ones who don't can buy their shit..i've been reading online since 1995 for free.
the owners of those paper surely couldn't afford out-of-pocket to pay professional journalists and research teams..they need my $1.
i agree about AP and Reuters- that's the way it should be.
hanimmal
Well-Known Member
I pay for the Washington Post. And I just went to the NY Times (who I don't have a account to) and clicked into 3 stories and didn't get any messages, so I wasn't able to see how many free a month you get.
So is it supposed to be 2 a month from NY Times? I know when I get the message that says 'reached my limit' it is a monthly deal that I can read another article though.
There is all kinds of garbage online for free so I don't doubt you can read things for free, but the question I always have is why can you read it for free, who is behind the money that is pushing the 'free' narratives.
I really liked this guys ideas about paying people for their online activity and using that to pay for their access to information.
Yeah but they rely on those newspapers paying to use their content.
true that and i'm not paying for it. i don't need to be translated to or force fed what to think
and the ones that do, don't read their rag..they're reading Epoch Times and waiting for communiques from Q.
'they're going to show us the evidence soon'..you'd think after a year or so they'd get tired of saying that and change the record.
Hollatchaboy
Well-Known Member
Did I say something wrong? Thats just my opinion and how I perceive it. I'm in no way saying that I'm right. I'm not trying to offend anybody.