Yep, too many mouth breathers in there not to.Imma still wearing the mask when I go to WalMart, j/s
If I understand, and I’m not sure I do, how does the adoption of a given Ct value suggest bias by the CDC?Shouldn’t a standard of 28 CT be applied to the general testing regime? And if not, then why? This reeks of the CDC gaming the data in favor of vaccinated individuals. C’mon mannn. Where is the honesty?
“Respiratory specimen for SARS-CoV-2 sequencing
• Specimen selection
o Clinical specimens for sequencing should have an RT-PCR Ct value ≤28.
o If a Ct value is not available, specimens that are positive for SARS-CoV-2 RNA or antigen by
another testing modality may be sent.”
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/covid-19/downloads/Information-for-laboratories-COVID-vaccine-breakthrough-case-investigation.pdf
Tonight's Bill Maher show cancelled.
View attachment 4900791
Fully vaccinated, still positive^^^^^^^^^^^
I also heard on the Howard Stern show one day last week (not exactly a go to source of news) that 74 fully vac'd people have died from covid-19.
How true that is and other info like ages, co-morbidity wasn't mentioned.
Giant Eagle says you still have to wear a mask. I got no problem with that.
Common sense still takes you a long way.
They are still using ct value 40 and under for normal cases of covid-19.If I understand, and I’m not sure I do, how does the adoption of a given Ct value suggest bias by the CDC?
I am not seeing the connection between picking a cycle number and that showing bias by the CDC.They are still using ct value 40 and under for normal cases of covid-19.
“What is now sort of evolving into a bit of a standard,” Fauci said, is that “if you get a cycle threshold of 35 or more … the chances of it being replication-[competent] are minuscule.”
“It’s very frustrating for the patients as well as for the physicians,” he continued, when “somebody comes in, and they repeat their PCR, and it’s like [a] 37 cycle threshold, but you almost never can culture virus from a 37 threshold cycle.”
So, I think if somebody does come in with 37, 38, even 36, you got to say, you know, it’s just dead nucleotides, period.”
What I think is that with over half a million deaths ascribed to the virus, the reality of the pandemic is beyond uncertainty. The deaths figure is not tied in any way to over- or undercount by testing.PCR tests have proven to cause false positives before. Creating a pseudo-epidemic. They didn’t realize until they used definitive testing. Going based off of PCR test they thought they had an epidemic on their hands.
https://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/22/health/22whoop.html
“Users of RT-PCR reagents should read the IFU carefully to determine if manual adjustment of the PCR positivity threshold is necessary to account for any background noise which may lead to a specimen with a high cycle threshold (Ct) value result being interpreted as a positive result.”I am not seeing the connection between picking a cycle number and that showing bias by the CDC.
https://web.archive.org/web/20210120083427/https://www.who.int/news/item/14-12-2020-who-information-notice-for-ivd-usersWhat I think is that with over half a million deaths ascribed to the virus, the reality of the pandemic is beyond uncertainty. The deaths figure is not tied in any way to over- or undercount by testing.
~edit~
PCR tech has advanced a lot from 2007 to now.
It is only a "breakthrough" case if someone caught it after being vaccinated. They are not studying unvaccinated people.breakthrough cases
Yeah, but if this is to “maximize the quality of data” why not apply it to general testing for covid so we came “maximize the quality of data” there? Just doesn’t make any sense. Why change the cycle threshold value to 28 or under for vaccinated individuals and not in general? They are gaming the system.It is only a "breakthrough" case if someone caught it after being vaccinated. They are not studying unvaccinated people.
It is nice to see covid didn't get any of the dogs.Covid kills more police than everything else combined...
2020 Total Line of Duty Deaths: 362
Total Deaths by Month
- 9/11 related illness14
- Aircraft accident1
- Assault1
- Automobile crash19
- COVID19234
- Drowned4
- Duty related illness5
- Gunfire45
- Gunfire (Inadvertent)4
- Heart attack7
- Heatstroke1
- Motorcycle crash4
- Struck by vehicle8
- Vehicle pursuit2
- Vehicular assault13
Total Deaths by State
- January13
- February9
- March20
- April57
- May31
- June30
- July44
- August35
- September28
- October19
- November31
- December45
Total Deaths by Gender
- Alabama5
- Arizona2
- Arkansas5
- California17
- Colorado3
- Connecticut1
- District of Columbia3
- Florida18
- Georgia20
- Guam2
- Hawaii2
- Idaho1
- Illinois10
- Indiana3
- Kansas6
- Kentucky3
- Louisiana19
- Massachusetts3
- Michigan10
- Mississippi7
- Missouri8
- Nebraska1
- Nevada2
- New Jersey14
- New York21
- North Carolina10
- North Dakota1
- Ohio4
- Oklahoma7
- Pennsylvania12
- Puerto Rico7
- Rhode Island1
- South Carolina10
- South Dakota1
- Tennessee4
- Texas74
- Tribal Police6
- U.S. Government26
- Utah1
- Virginia3
- Washington7
- West Virginia1
- Wisconsin1
Statistics
- Male333
- Female29
Total K9 Line of Duty Deaths: 22
- Average age49
- Average tour of duty18 years, 4 months
if they tested dogs....It is nice to see covid didn't get any of the dogs.