Covid-19

FresnoFarmer

FresnoFarmer

Well-Known Member
cannabineer said:
I read it.

The article illustrates the fallacy you are espousing, which hinges on the use of scientific terminology without the education needed to use it right.

This allows the appearance of making a complex and legitimate argument, when they are actually backing a specious one. Without the actual scientific education, they are unrestrained from seeing their error.
Click to expand...
That’s like saying people without a law degree should only trust those with a law degree because they might misunderstand the law. On the contrary, I have seen many folks in jail study the law in the law library themselves because their lawyer wasn’t actually fighting the case from all angles. And they actually win the case as a result of their tedious personal research. Myself included. I have seen many people get washed up after putting their trust into “expert” lawyers. Putting trust into authority figures isn’t always the smartest play.
 
cannabineer

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
FresnoFarmer said:
That’s like saying people without a law degree should only trust those with a law degree because they might misunderstand the law. On the contrary, I have seen many folks in jail study the law in the law library themselves because their lawyer wasn’t actually fighting the case from all angles. And they actually win the case as a result of their tedious personal research. Myself included. I have seen many people get washed up after putting their trust into “expert” lawyers. Putting trust into authority figures isn’t always the smartest play.
Click to expand...
No.

I wasn’t making an argument to authority.

I was making an argument for education.

You missed the point again.
 
srh88

srh88

Well-Known Member
FresnoFarmer said:
That’s like saying people without a law degree should only trust those with a law degree because they might misunderstand the law. On the contrary, I have seen many folks in jail study the law in the law library themselves because their lawyer wasn’t actually fighting the case from all angles. And they actually win the case as a result of their tedious personal research. Myself included. I have seen many people get washed up after putting their trust into “expert” lawyers. Putting trust into authority figures isn’t always the smartest play.
Click to expand...
I've done that too. But we had access to a law library. Our case law wasn't mutating. Unless it's a giant conspiracy that millions 9f doctors and scientists are in on.. people with hands on work with it. Not just someone who's learning second hand.
Just my 17 cents
 
FresnoFarmer

FresnoFarmer

Well-Known Member
cannabineer said:
If this is a display of your autodidact legal knowledge, it explains your inability to bring a valid epidemiological argument here.
Click to expand...
What are you talking about? You’re reaching.

“A three-judge panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on Friday threw out California's ban on high-capacity ammunition magazines, saying the law violates the U.S. Constitution's protection of the right to bear firearms.”
https://abc7.com/ammunition-magazines-california-ban/6370763/
 
FresnoFarmer

FresnoFarmer

Well-Known Member
cannabineer

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
FresnoFarmer said:
What are you talking about? You’re reaching.
Click to expand...
Allow me to explain.

FresnoFarmer said:
Love me a clean 1911. What cleaning products do y’all use? I use Ballistol.View attachment 4900721
Click to expand...
If posting a self-incriminating picture with identifying tattoos is an example of your self-taught legal education, you cannot grasp epidemiology.

Worse, you argue like Finshaggy. Since you don't understand the point, you just add more distracting verbiage.

At this point I give up. I cannot reach you.
 
Singlemalt

Singlemalt

Well-Known Member

Vacated judgment - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org
A vacated judgment makes a previous legal judgment legally void. A vacated judgment is usually the result of the judgment of an appellate court, which overturns, reverses, or sets aside the judgment of a lower court. An appellate court may also vacate its own decisions.

The law has never required anyone to return verboten items, they require you not to have them
 
FresnoFarmer

FresnoFarmer

Well-Known Member
cannabineer said:
Allow me to explain.



If posting a self-incriminating picture with identifying tattoos is an example of your self-taught legal education, you cannot grasp epidemiology.

Worse, you argue like Finshaggy. Since you don't understand the point, you just add more distracting verbiage.

At this point I give up. I cannot reach you.
Click to expand...
Incriminating how? I legally purchased everything in the photo. You seem a lil bit butthurt lol.
 
FresnoFarmer

FresnoFarmer

Well-Known Member
https://crpa.org/news/blogs/crpa-alert-moving-forward-with-large-capacity-magazine-court-ordered-stay/

However, the court has clarified that anyone who “manufactured, imported, sold, or bought” such magazines during “Freedom Week” cannot be prosecuted for violating California’s “large-capacity” magazine restrictions. What’s more, the court’s June 2017 injunction prohibiting California from enforcing its restriction against the “possession” of such magazines, remains in effect.
 
FresnoFarmer

FresnoFarmer

Well-Known Member
II. CAN I CONTINUE TO POSSESS THE MAGAZINES I LAWFULLY ACQUIRED?
YES! As of the date of this bulletin, California’s restrictions against “possession” have been unenforceable since June 29, 2017, when this same court issued a preliminary injunction preventing it from taking effect while the parties litigated the merits of the case.

III. CAN I USE THE MAGAZINES I LAWFULLY ACQUIRED AT A SHOOTING RANGE?
YES! For the same reasons above, California does not currently prohibit the “possession” of magazines capable of holding more than 10 rounds. Only activities involving the manufacture, importation, sale, transfer or receipt of such magazines are prohibited. The mere “use” of a magazine at a shooting range, for example, is not specifically prohibited. But BEWARE: the use of any “large-capacity” magazine in either a semiautomatic, centerfire rifle with a fixed magazine or a semiautomatic pistol with a fixed magazine could classify the firearm as an illegal “assault weapon” under California law.1
 
Singlemalt

Singlemalt

Well-Known Member
FresnoFarmer said:
https://crpa.org/news/blogs/crpa-alert-moving-forward-with-large-capacity-magazine-court-ordered-stay/

However, the court has clarified that anyone who “manufactured, imported, sold, or bought” such magazines during “Freedom Week” cannot be prosecuted for violating California’s “large-capacity” magazine restrictions. What’s more, the court’s June 2017 injunction prohibiting California from enforcing its restriction against the “possession” of such magazines, remains in effect.
Click to expand...
For now. Personally I don't care, the rationale behind my posting this was to caution against public admissions of illegal behavior/actions. Remember when Calif gun registration was only for new purchases of handguns and grandfathered guns were exempt? Later the law was changed to include every gun as well as rifles.
 
FresnoFarmer

FresnoFarmer

Well-Known Member
Singlemalt said:
For now. Personally I don't care, the rationale behind my posting this was to caution against public admissions of illegal behavior/actions. Remember when Calif gun registration was only for new purchases of handguns and grandfathered guns were exempt? Later the law was changed to include every gun as well as rifles.
Click to expand...
I’m legally within my rights.....Period.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top