You just said above the SCOTUS ruled against Gerrymandering. So it is not allowed, I guess that says it is a crime. I have just been following your words for guidance.
You really are a very special kind of stupid, aren't you?
The Supreme Court of the United States is NOT a criminal court. It interprets law and guides it so that it is constitutional. I don't know how many times I have to say that. Apparently, several hundred as that block of granite you call a brain isn't capable of absorbing it the first time.
Their ruling didn't make gerrymandering illegal. It stated that the way North Carolina did it violated the constitution. There is still no law against gerrymandering. That's what the Biden administration needs to do and could do now that they have that ruling in their corner.
That you don't grasp that is simply mind boggling. I'll try one last time to dumb this down to your level with the most layman example I know of: Ernesto Miranda.
Everybody has heard the Miranda warning:
You have the right to remain silent.
Anything that you say can be used against you in a court of law.
You have the right to an attorney.
You have the right to have your attorney present with you during any questioning.
If you can not afford an attorney, one will be appointed to you at no cost.
Do you understand these rights as I have explained them to you?
That is the bare bones Miranda warning. You can add to it, and many jurisdictions do, but you can not subtract from it.
Now then, the only part of that warning that has to do with Ernesto Miranda is the very last light I bolded. You see, Miranda was a criminal. (Fun fact everybody involved in getting the Miranda warning written was a criminal.)
Miranda had a long list of convictions; petty theft, breaking and entering, several assaults, etc. Well, one day he saw a girl he wanted, followed her home and raped her. He did this without even trying to hide it. Several people saw him going into and out of the dwelling the girl lived in, the girl picked him out of a lineup...
It was an open and shut case. So they told Ernesto basically this: Look, we've got you dead to rights and you know it. You can either go to trial, get convicted and do 15 years, or you can plead guilty, save us the trouble, get sentenced to 5 years and be out in 2 or 3.
Miranda took the path of least resistance and signed a confession and that was that. Until it wasn't.
On the confession form he filled out, at the very top it said something like:
I ________________________________ make this confession of my own free will, without any coercion, knowing and understanding my legal rights.
It took a lawyer from the ACLU about 2 seconds to see that form with that sentence on it that Miranda filled out and file an appeal on his behalf. The argument was simple: How did Ernesto Miranda understand his rights? Did the cop explain it to him? No. Did a judge? No.
In fact, nobody did.
It went all the way to the Supreme Court and the Supreme Court agreed: How on earth can someone make a confession knowing all of their legal rights when nobody bothered to ever explain to him what his legal rights really were?
Now, that ruling DID NOT CREATE the Miranda act. What it did do was get Miranda's confession thrown out and his conviction overturned. Nobody went to jail for it because as in the North Carolina gerrymandering case, nobody actually broke any law, they simply had a process that wasn't accounted for within the law that violated the constitution.
It would be several months and a couple more SCOTUS cases thrown in (Gideon, Escobeto) before we would have the Miranda act we have today. But nobody went to jail over it, nobody was charged with it, because laws in this nation are crafted piece by piece. You can't break a law that doesn't actually exist.
North Carolina had to redraw its districts. Arizona had to retry Miranda. That was all that really happened in either case until of course the Miranda Act was passed a few months later.
And Miranda himself? Well, the publicity was so bad that Arizona had to move the trial out of the state and everybody used assumed names. He was still found guilty and went to prison. A few years later he got out and went back to being Miranda. A few years after that, he was murdered. His murderer was one of the first people in the nation to be given the Miranda Warning.