CatHedral
Well-Known Member
Pretty sure mooray said it was sarcasm.Euthanizing. Clever use of semantics. Is it for you, or the condemned?
Pretty sure mooray said it was sarcasm.Euthanizing. Clever use of semantics. Is it for you, or the condemned?
And it's so easy too. Simply displace the air with odorless inert gas like nitrogen. Its like the pilots whose oxygen failed. Never even knew they passed out.The problem as I see it is that the death penalty is a punishment and really is a form of ultimate torture. That is one big reason why I am opposed to it.
We have the capability to peacefully put people to sleep with anesthesia first, but we don't. There is no reason we should kill people the way we do.
That word (sarcasm) was used in response to you. I didn't read it initially, I had to go back and look.Pretty sure mooray said it was sarcasm.
I call Bull Shit...I thought this was a fantastic article worthy of sharing
The White Privilege to Terrorize
Photo AFP via Getty Images. As a white man watching the Michigan protests of Governor Gretchen Whitmer’s stay-at-home orders, all I could think was: Black people don’t get to do this. Muslims don’t get to do this. Latinos don’t get to do this. People who don’t look like this don’t get to do...johnpavlovitz.com
I call Bull Shit...
Which part new guy?I call Bull Shit...
Wouldn't commuting Roof's sentence to life yet executing the next black man in line (justice system is biased toward executing black men) be an injustice?Because the death penalty is legal is not an excuse to continue the practice.
Actually the article is spot on and you are wrong.I call Bull Shit...
Yes.Wouldn't commuting Roof's sentence to life yet executing the next black man in line (justice system is biased toward executing black men) be an injustice?
Because if Roof is selected out of death row without any other changes just propagates bias toward executing black men. Change the law.
Euthanizing. Clever use of semantics. Is it for you, or the condemned?
No sarcasm. The death penalty is currently by gas or lethal injection and if you've been over the topic before, then you know that...sometimes that shit doesn't work very well and is downright cruel. If the killing of anything must take place, I can only support the humane version of it. I wouldn't even want Hitler tortured, because if you kill something/someone out of hate, it's immoral, imo. The use of the word isn't clever, it's very specific, because humane treatment is a key component of any society worth living in. Even killing must be done humanely. There are worse things than ceasing to exist.Pretty sure mooray said it was sarcasm.
So, execution is still okay with you, as long as it fits your definition of humane? What's worse than ceasing to exist? Just curious. Is it spending life behind bars?No sarcasm. The death penalty is currently by gas or lethal injection and if you've been over the topic before, then you know that...sometimes that shit doesn't work very well and is downright cruel. If the killing of anything must take place, I can only support the humane version of it. I wouldn't even want Hitler tortured, because if you kill something/someone out of hate, it's immoral, imo. The use of the word isn't clever, it's very specific, because humane treatment is a key component of any society worth living in. Even killing must be done humanely. There are worse things than ceasing to exist.
Source? That’d be an interesting readNazis got their tactics from american whites. Hitler was a huge fan of our eugenics programs and our ethnic cleansing of the american native population.
American eugenics historically, is a misinformed notion that selective breeding enforced by white majorities(from slave era to modern day) results in a better society, when in actuality it produces offspring of higher value to the class that owns/coerces them. That's all, the quality of human just slides further to sociopathy.Source? That’d be an interesting read
You do realize eugenics is a progressive cause don’t you?
Source from a US academic publisher? Does Mein Kampf have a references appendix?Your veiled "do your own research" is this close to marginalizing you. Thatis a troll diagnostic.American eugenics historically, is a misinformed notion that selective breeding enforced by white majorities(from slave era to modern day) results in a better society, when in actuality it produces offspring of higher value to the class that owns/coerces them. That's all, the quality of human just slides further to sociopathy.
As far as sources and literature, read meinkampf by hitler himself. His own opinions are laid bare.
You want evidence that hitler liked native american concentration camps and modelled his ethnic cleansing after americans? Really? If you're so curious you should be able to expend some effort without recoiling at the thought of "doing your own homework". I did make the claim, so I will have to defend it, it's not difficult.Source from a US academic publisher? Your veiled "do your own research" is this close to marginalizing you. Perform or be ignored.
1) When you put (sarcasm) immediately after the word "euthanize", it is plain the parenthetical comment refers to the preceding word.No sarcasm. The death penalty is currently by gas or lethal injection and if you've been over the topic before, then you know that...sometimes that shit doesn't work very well and is downright cruel. If the killing of anything must take place, I can only support the humane version of it. I wouldn't even want Hitler tortured, because if you kill something/someone out of hate, it's immoral, imo. The use of the word isn't clever, it's very specific, because humane treatment is a key component of any society worth living in. Even killing must be done humanely. There are worse things than ceasing to exist.
Make with a clear reference or accept that you are a troll. No link, no standing.You want evidence that hitler liked native american concentration camps and modelled his ethnic cleansing after americans? Really? If you're so curious you should be able to expend some effort without recoiling at the thought of "doing your own homework". I did make the claim, so I will have to defend it, it's not difficult.
Sloppily.That word (sarcasm) was used in response to you. I didn't read it initially, I had to go back and look.
Edit: I've been in and out. I have other stuff to do.
Do you have the attention span capable of reading a book with citations?Make with a clear reference or accept that you are a troll. No link, no standing.
Well it's wonderful being able to be able to disagree !Actually the article is spot on and you are wrong.