I don’t really know how to break this down in a more basic form. The articles posted said they don’t know why whites given aid climb out of poverty at a higher rate than black people.
I think you are mistaken in what this chart says.
I believe that it is saying after receiving the government assistance that white people are given enough money to push them above the poverty line. As in their income plus the aid were enough to not be in poverty.
So for example some white single mom living in a rural town getting aid is given enough to lift them out of poverty, may have fewer job opportunities, but also less competition for those jobs and is able to make a lower wage and with the aid they are able to not be considered living in poverty.
The person who posted those graphs was trying to make this point in response to the OP “no dude it’s the whites using federal aid see these charts and graphs?!”
You mean white people using the federal aid more in response to their race baiting bullshit of Democrats use more.
In all of these threads, people are speaking in absolutes about “white people,” and the moment any other race gets painted with a wide brush it’s racist. Do I think any color is harder working than any other color? Absolutely not.
If you would have included the sentence I wrote before, you’d get the hint I’m a big fan of the individual and not the artificially created “group”
“I’d draw a conclusion the individual receiving the help is the vehicle to his or her own success.”
lol at your 'people say' troll.
It is nice to know you don't think the racist lies about one race vs another.
And I agree with your not being a big fan of the artificially created 'group' (although your people say in all threads thing seems like you use it when it suits your needs), that is why it pisses me off that the Republicans are using this kind of racist trolling (like they are with CRT, and their socialism lying spam) to divide our society.
“I’d draw a conclusion the individual receiving the help is the vehicle to his or her own success.”
Agreed. But it makes it a hell of a lot easier when you have not been subject to generational racism that has forced huge populations into very very small areas that are economically demolished for decades.
I think there will be difficulties for the next couple of years for those on a budget that was already stretched thin. You would be shocked how many Americans have zero dollars to their name (a lot of this is personal choice/people living way beyond their means) and are behind on rent or their mortgage. I say the next couple years because it’s only started to hurt for those people. Cheap food and cheap electricity are priority number one, and neither will remain a reality in the near future
This is why I am a big fan of the social programs that Biden and the Democrats have enacted (and are still trying to enact) to make sure that people are able to get through the next couple years without having to struggle as much as they would otherwise had to.
One thing is for sure, these shitty Republican school boards doing things like taking food programs away from kids because 'they could get used to it' needs to end.
And as for your 'zero dollars' troll. I lived paycheck to paycheck for decades. So no, it would not shock me.
You read it like I said that. I asked an OBVIOUS sarcastic question in response to the charts and graphs posted by
@hanimmal. As in charts and graphs can be made to say anything
Sure, but the Washington Post has the ability to be sued, and fact checked, which is why their charts are almost always reliable (typo's and human errors do happen), and also why I posted the entire article.
Probably because he's sick of liberals blaming him for everything that's wrong in this country...
lol snow flaking racist white knighting. Classic.