CatHedral
Well-Known Member
reliable?You claim reaction to a particular accusation is a reliable way to determine guilt. Is that a mischaracterization? If so, show me something. I'd enjoy learning the accuracy of this method.
reliable?You claim reaction to a particular accusation is a reliable way to determine guilt. Is that a mischaracterization? If so, show me something. I'd enjoy learning the accuracy of this method.
If Trump provided data to the Russian military that endangered the lives of US Troops that would be significant. I haven't seen any proof of the claim but I am open to the idea. Do you have anything outside of accusation?'MSM' Nice one troll. Keep on selling.
Republican led bi-partisan senate reports, Court documents, and AP news is not good enough for this idiot.
Same old shit with these propaganda spam trolls.
https://www.rollitup.org/t/trumps-war-on-factual-news-journalism.1020994/post-15734531
What if someone called you a pedophile during a workplace meeting or another setting where there that type of accusation could entail negative social consequences? I believe some people would shrug it off, others would become offended, some would become irate, and some might attempt to assault you. I don't think you could accurately conclude which one is the guilty party based on their response. I am not aware of this being a reliable way to determine guilt.If some crazy person stars calling you pedophile in time square... you keep going...only a reactive soft skinned moron stays to duscuss the crazy merits of crazy peoprls arguments.
Or a pedephile being called out
Narrow minded, weak logic, simpletons with vested agenda in muddling ethics and morales with feelings.i'm just so tired of racist little trolls trying to start shit. not dealing with them any more, i'll let my previous observation of horse semen on both their chins stand for itself, and ignore them both...they can go suck kyle's dick when they get tired of the horse
You asserted Trump provided data to the Russian military. The goalposts aren't moving. You haven't provided proof outside of the accusation. What you're saying might be true. I'd love to learn.
Lol, lack of evidence is not evidence... you are a young sock puppetYou asserted Trump provided data to the Russian military. The goalposts aren't moving. You haven't provided proof outside of the accusation. What you're saying might be true. I'd love to learn.
yeah, all the right wingers are saying they didn't support Trump. now they are saying itBy the way, are you one of these fellows who cannot maintain a conversation without talking about Trump? I don't care about Trump. I don't like Trump. I wouldn't vote for Trump. I don't care what you think about Trump.
I’m jealous of your success,no, just far enough to keep smearing you with your own shit
Then you react like an adult and bring it up to managment, if you are management you fire that persom. Cuase its an at will state, and you dont need a reason, or accusatuons like this are not employee material.What if someone called you a pedophile during a workplace meeting or another setting where there that type of accusation could entail negative social consequences? I believe some people would shrug it off, others would become offended, some would become irate, and some might attempt to assault you. I don't think you could accurately conclude which one is the guilty party based on their response. I am not aware of this being a reliable way to determine guilt.
Absence of proof is not proof of absence but lack of evidence remains evidence that a thing in question may be false. In particular, when there should be evidence. I will be bookmarking this thread and checking back until evidence of Trump giving data to the Russian military is provided.Lol, lack of evidence is not evidence... you are a young sock puppet
Sure I did troll.You asserted Trump provided data to the Russian military. The goalposts aren't moving. You haven't provided proof outside of the accusation.
Very convincing.What you're saying might be true. I'd love to learn.
See there is more of that goalpost moving bullshit again.Absence of proof is not proof of absence but lack of evidence remains evidence that a thing in question may be false. In particular, when there should be evidence. I will be bookmarking this thread and checking back until evidence of Trump giving data to the Russian military is provided.
That is not what is said... you are not very good at tbis are you. And if you have no proof and are assuming something is false vs accurate.. thats a choice not supported by what is known.Absence of proof is not proof of absence but lack of evidence remains evidence that a thing in question may be false. In particular, when there should be evidence. I will be bookmarking this thread and checking back until evidence of Trump giving data to the Russian military is provided.
My apologies, when I stepped out of that discussion you had only posted an accusatorial news piece. I didn't see your later posts. I will take a look at what you posted.Sure I did troll.
https://www.rollitup.org/t/anyone-else-watching-the-kyle-rittenhouse-trial.1065377/post-16650008
View attachment 5031982
Very convincing.
It is not like I have not provided the information in a very easy to get to format for you multiple times now.
https://www.rollitup.org/t/anyone-else-watching-the-kyle-rittenhouse-trial.1065377/post-16653694
See there is more of that goalpost moving bullshit again.