lulz
I read that bit of fluff and much more informative articles too., such as this one:
When I was asked to run the Democratic Party after the Russians hacked our emails, I stumbled onto a shocking truth about the Clinton campaign.
www.politico.com
The optics on this scandal are terrible. Political opponents to the established Democratic Party leaders had a field day. But I knew when you started spouting the extreme propaganda lines from Clinton's most extreme critics where you were going. I knew that I owned you.
Hillary Clinton's campaign agreed to rescue the DNC after they ran out of money. In exchange for keeping the DNC on life support and saving the Democratic Party the embarrassment of a public bankruptcy they gave the money with strings attached. It was legal. It was sure as hell sketchy. If one wants to point out that Hillary Clinton was embroiled in sketchy but legal scandals, I'd agree.
What else is said about this scandal is nobody was hurt. Bernie wasn't even using funds from the DNC. He had agreed to pay the DNC a certain amount to use DNC infrastructure, which he used but didn't pay for. He broke an agreement with the DNC and "Clinton's controlled DNC" just looke the other way.
Clinton did not control DNC's funds, she controlled her campaign's funds. Donna Brazille said so. You can take things out of context and pull a sentence out that looks like you are speaking truth. In context and in Brazille's own words, she described a sketchy but legal and reasonable funding mechanism to keep the DNC running during the primary.
I just owned you, bitch. Go make me a sammich.