Fogdog
Well-Known Member
an opinion from a novice like myself on this subject is not worth much. An opinion from the Director of the US NIH is worth more. I'll listen to him. He didn't say anything that was not true. Maybe I did. Time will tell.It’s not defined as a contradiction as that would imply that it went against theory, it is simply an unexpected finding which needs more scientific exploration with new studies.
You are citing opinion (albeit from a respected expert) in favour of research, the expert you mention would favour the research over his own opinion, as is the scientific method.
Agree that reasons for the boost in protection after the third shot are speculative at this time. I don't think anybody is talking about quashing research into why people were protected from infection by omicron after the third shot and not so much from just two.
Still, though, this is fairly convincing and came from the same bulletin by the Director of the NIH: