ActionianJacksonian
Well-Known Member
Were you trying to reinforce the point of the meme or just unaware of the fact that you did?
Were you trying to reinforce the point of the meme or just unaware of the fact that you did?
Right, so you are just trolling. Did your mommy do you a disfavor by telling you that you were smart? pro tip: you are not.Look just ask your self how long it's been since the last time they gave you electroshock therapy and what was your name before that happened and who's driving you around America, to cheap to even get u a fake ID. Do you and your masters actually think the NSA etc. doesn't know what your up to?
This kind or right wing bullshit that your kind proliferate is is called othering. It's what Nazis used against Jews and what Republicans did a decade ago to Muslims. It is what Trump was doing when he made his speech about Mexico "is not sending us their best, blah blah". This time, however, your kind are the minority using speech like this against a majority. It can't work. Not politically. What it does do is inflame unstable weak minded people who believe what you say it true. People get hurt when that happens. I don't understand why anybody would want this.It sounds like you secretly are into all that shit but try not to dwell on it when your not mid ritual masterbating in coffins etc.
I've said it before, will say it again, all of us parents think your preoccupation with pedophiles is creepy and a big red flag.Why do you care if we expose pedophiles if your not a pedophile? Only pedophiles are offended by exposing pedophiles... lol
Only if you don't know how to use a graph.Were you trying to reinforce the point of the meme or just unaware of the fact that you did?
thats the plots of "live free or die hard" and "faceoff".....what the fuck man? have you been trolling us with movie plots this whole time?Maybe they will finally arrest someone guilty for this stuff and then we will see. Who knows maybe they just replace them with a lookalike; so nobody knows there missing and cant find out they took them to a black site and cut their faces off with a bread knife or some crazy shit like that. I think the government is more likely to operate that way these days than to put pedophiles on the news and say their trying to controll the government at the highest level with sexual coercion because that would cause a "fire sale". A fire sale would effectively help the foreign influencers who use sex to manipulate politics and powerfull people like intelligence officials. That's why I'm taking an educated guess and saying they probably just take the real pedophiles to a black site safe house and saw of their face on video then send it to the foreign intelligence services who MK Ultra'ed them and sent them to run interference on us. Then they replace them with a lookalike who can fool facial recognition and the rest of us are none the wiser.
because they're fucking stupid....mystery solved gang, now lets go get high in the mystery machine and then go for frosty chocolate milkshakes and shaggy and scooby can make a giant sandwich...Why do people hate Bill Gates for falsely believing he put microchips in covid vaccines but they have no problem with Elon who actually plans on putting microchips into peoples brains?
I'm with ya, I really don't think the Democratic party has changed at all over the last 16 decades or so.Only if you don't know how to use a graph.
At best Musk is just another in the long line of spoiled rich white guys who got themselves radicalized in the last decade to think that everyone else moved and they stayed the same.
Sure it does.I'm with ya, I really don't think the Democratic party has changed at all over the last 16 decades or so.
He’s decided to build a new Leaning Tower of Crazy out o’ post-dated Girl Scouts & electric eyeballs…and his mindless flopping pronouncements somehow pwn…I dunno, *someone*. Maybe Elonwait what?....
FIFYI'm with ya, I really don't think.
Are you saying you're proud Democrats finally joined the 19th century to allow non-whites?Sure it does.
Yeah it happened in the post ww2 era when the racists started their 'Southern Strategy' and moved over into the Republican party to consolidate power after gerrymandering states to keep power out of the segregated areas.Are you saying you're proud Democrats finally joined the 19th century to allow non-whites?
We are unfortunately living in a period where race baiting hate mongers have taken over the Republican party. Understanding why this is bad/inefficient/shit economic and social policy is important.Also, you seem to bring up race a lot, are you white or just white knighting for me or "us" or whatever?
So you're beating around the Bush that you're white and that race is still a key platform issue in the Democratic party today just as it was then?Yeah it happened in the post ww2 era when the racists started their 'Southern Strategy' and moved over into the Republican party to consolidate power after gerrymandering states to keep power out of the segregated areas.
The Democrats are the first major political party in, as far as I know feel free to point out a counter example to this, the history of the world that is truly representative of and legislating for 100% of our nation's citizens. I really look forward to the Republicans finally casting off their racists/fascist members and joining them so that our country can really start working at as close to 100% efficient as possible.
Drawing your leaders from about 10% of the population just leads to the same bad decisions that the Republicans have been making for the last century.
We are unfortunately living in a period where race baiting hate mongers have taken over the Republican party. Understanding why this is bad/inefficient/shit economic and social policy is important.
You mean that to be able to legislate for all of America that you would better off having input from people who have lived in almost every community in America and understands the needs and issues that they have to get to better outcomes? Because then sure. Just picking from the same handful of spoiled rich nepotistic gene pool whose perspective is not something that 90% of Americans experience is what has led to shit outcomes too many times.So you're beating around the Bush that you're white and that race is still a key platform issue in the Democratic party today just as it was then?
That makes sense, thanks for clarification; I would hate to assume someone's views.
Then STOP ASSUMING, *duh*…So you're beating around the Bush that you're white and that race is still a key platform issue in the Democratic party today just as it was then?
That makes sense, thanks for clarification; I would hate to assume someone's views.
So, the question is, are you honestly, ignorantly wrong about the “GOP” & racism? Or are you just a willfully corrupt liar?Y'all don't quote me on this. You start out in 1954 by saying, "Nigger, nigger, nigger". By 1968, you can't say "nigger"—that hurts you. Backfires. So you say stuff like forced busing, states' rights and all that stuff. You're getting so abstract now [that] you're talking about cutting taxes, and all these things you're talking about are totally economic things and a byproduct of them is [that] blacks get hurt worse than whites. And subconsciously maybe that is part of it. I'm not saying that. But I'm saying that if it is getting that abstract, and that coded, that we are doing away with the racial problem one way or the other. You follow me—because obviously sitting around saying, "We want to cut this", is much more abstract than even the busing thing, and a hell of a lot more abstract than "Nigger, nigger". So, any way you look at it, race is coming on the back-burner.