hanimmal
Well-Known Member
I must say- this thread seems to of gotten bumped and has a stupid title.
I must say- this thread seems to of gotten bumped and has a stupid title.
sorry, couldn't resist.
While the term “subversive element” has been badly abused, I believe it applies here. The First Amendment does not honor speech designed to erode the republic.
I think Youtube and the other major social media sites are right to put an end to the death cult trolling. They are preying on the vulnerable. And boring in their repetitive disregard of actual science.
The whole yelling 'fire' in a crowded room thing I think applies to these attempts to brainwash people with the nonstop spam designed to trigger vulnerable people into being unsafe while simultaneously burying anything positive that is going on.While the term “subversive element” has been badly abused, I believe it applies here. The First Amendment does not honor speech designed to erode the republic.
yes. It rises to the level of clear and present danger.The whole yelling 'fire' in a crowded room thing I think applies to these attempts to brainwash people with the nonstop spam designed to trigger vulnerable people into being unsafe while simultaneously burying anything positive that is going on.
if that is the case, she classifies me with the trolls using, not to put too fine a point on it, an untenable and sentiment-driven criterion.https://www.rollitup.org/t/vaccinated-stay-contagious-longer-than-unvaccinated.1078102/post-17043624
@cannabineer I think she meant the one that you posted in. It is a flat out lie (and a dangerous one for the people vulnerable enough to believe that shit) that has been bumped onto the front page every day since it was made. I am not white knighting for her or anything, but seriously that thread needs to die.
It has nothing to do with politics and is wrong, but the title keeps getting pushed into relevance on this site for no reason.
I disagree strongly.if that is the case, she classifies me with the trolls.
Imo it is healthy for nontrolls to bump them. The comprehensive counterarguments are right there. That easily outweighs the fact that the titles offend those
Furthermore, my tour de farce, which was an attempt at satire but (see illustration), is perhaps being shunned not for merit but for location.who choose to be offended.
If any of this is incorrect in a way that can be articulated, please tell me.
So how then to effectively counterargue against them if I am being counseled not even to illustrate the subversive content?I disagree strongly.
Just the fact that those propagandists sentences are constantly pushed into people's minds (even unconsciously) over and over is a dangerous thing. All this anti-vaccine spam over and over again from every angle that people see online turns into 'I saw something somewhere' kind of brainwashing. And enough stimulus repeated over and over again can really get us to believe a lot of shit that we know is wrong.
Make a thread with a counter title (that is truthful) and keep that bumped as long as the propaganda title is up IMO.So how then to effectively counterargue against them if I am being counseled not even to illustrate the subversive content?
not a gripe as much as a request for an agreeable yet effective other way.
That robs me of the freedom to respond where the post was made. I think your proposal has more liabilities than benefits. My opinion.Make a thread with a counter title (that is truthful) and keep that bumped as long as the propaganda title is up IMO.
I used to then reply to all their posts in them, but got told not to copy/paste the replies into them, so now I just bump this one when it becomes obvious that the propaganda titles are being spammed to point it out.
I try to not be surprised by the crazy shit people convince themselves even if it is consciously known to be untrue.That robs me of the freedom to respond where the post was made. I think your proposal has more liabilities than benefits. My opinion.
yeah but elephant/room. Am I committing the basic defect of emotionalizing? Between Jimdamick slamming me for a meaning he imposed on me to her and you suggesting that I am aiding and abetting the tards … I don’t see it.I try to not be surprised by the crazy shit people convince themselves even if it is consciously known to be untrue.
Sorry was out cutting my grass.yeah but elephant/room. Am I committing the basic defect of emotionalizing? Between Jimdamick slamming me for a meaning he imposed on me to her and you suggesting that I am aiding and abetting the tards … I don’t see it.
But that could be that the censorship vibe brought by this cluster of “wait wut” is distinctly pissing me off. Have I not established my bona fides? might I not expect presumption of that by the folks here whom I generally like and respect?
No worries man, we are in a very weird time in the internet programming and like that 'bah fah' video shows as clearly as anything I have ever seen, our brains are completely programmable to believe shit we see enough even when we KNOW it is false.So I’m dialing back. I’ve made bad arguments in an emotional basis before. The associated (and often ultimately wrong) righteous anger hits me in a reward circuit, so I’m a bit suspicious of my sentiment right now.
on a slightly different heading, I thank you for engaging me. Pissed off is frankly a step up from confused and unhappy, and I can manage it easier. You’re helping me.