Is Biden really that bad?

Status
Not open for further replies.

NYCBambu

Well-Known Member
trump is a twice impeached crook and belongs behind bars....dickless republicans left him in office.
View attachment 5172905
Never found guilty, just acts of desperation by the democrats. A waste of taxpayer money. You can blame him for covid but that would have happened to any president. You guys have been bamboozled by the media. Pre covid, Trumps GNP was way better than Obamas. Strong stock market too, stable inflation, and cheap gas. And Joes economy, has brought us down the toilet, into a recession. From defunding the police to raising taxes, to amnesty for illegal immigration, to enacting the Green New Deal, Biden has dragged our economy into a dumpster. All in one short year.

Joe has also always been a spokesman for China. Who knows how much they pay him. Dont forget, he is pushing us towards electric cars when all the batteries are made in China. Solar panels too, all China. Here he is trying to give them favored nation status:

 
Last edited:

NYCBambu

Well-Known Member
Never found guilty, just acts of desperation by the democrats. A waste of taxpayer money. You can blame him for covid but that would have happened to any president. You guys have been bamboozled by the media. Pre covid, Trumps GNP was way better than Obamas. Strong stock market too, stable inflation, and cheap gas. And Joes economy, has brought us down the toilet, into a recession. From defunding the police to raising taxes, to amnesty for illegal immigration, to enacting the Green New Deal, Biden has dragged our economy into a dumpster. All in one short year.

Joe has also always been a spokesman for China. Who knows how much they pay him. Dont forget, he is pushing us towards electric cars when all the batteries are made in China. Solar panels too, all China. Here he is trying to give them favored nation status:

So far I still have not heard even ONE DAM THING Joe Biden has done to help America. Before you buy into all Joes bullshit about how he created millions of jobs, look at the numbers. Feb, 2020 workforce: 158 million March 2022: 158 million No, you dont get credit for the same people going back to their old jobs.

 
Last edited:

doublejj

Well-Known Member
Never found guilty, just acts of desperation by the democrats. A waste of taxpayer money. You can blame him for covid but that would have happened to any president. You guys have been bamboozled by the media. Pre covid, Trumps GNP was way better than Obamas. Strong stock market too, stable inflation, and cheap gas. And Joes economy, has brought us down the toilet, into a recession. From defunding the police to raising taxes, to amnesty for illegal immigration, to enacting the Green New Deal, Biden has dragged our economy into a dumpster. All in one short year.

Joe has also always been a spokesman for China. Who knows how much they pay him. Dont forget, he is pushing us towards electric cars when all the batteries are made in China. Solar panels too, all China. Here he is trying to give them favored nation status:

how many times have trump bankrupted his companies? as he swindled decent honest people out of their money?
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
Speaking of impeachments.

Trump used the same tactic during the second trial in the Senate that he's trying to use now.

This thing where he claims a president may commit any crime as long as he says he believed it was in the interest of the country.

First time it was used: Trump was impeached for abuse of office because he threatened to withhold US national defense funds from Ukraine and asked for a "favor" -- a personal political favor -- to investigate Hunter Biden, the son of the man who was running against him. Trump was impeached. That is a matter or record. In a trial in the Senate, Republican Senators defended Trump by saying it's OK because he believed it was in the national interest. No explanation WHY it was in the national interest -- holding back funds that were part of a national security funding bill for what exactly? Well his judges didn't ask. They just said Trump believed it was in the national interest, so it's all good with them. Never mind that it made no legal sense. It made political sense to the Republican Senators.

nuff said. The trial in the Senate was a political event, not a legal one. The trial proved nothing regarding guilt or innocence.

Now: A brief has been filed for a civil lawsuit brought by seven injured Capitol police who are suing Trump, Tarrio, and a host of others -- by name. The suit, filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, claims that Trump and his co-defendants violated the Ku Klux Klan of 1871, which protects against violence that interferes with Congress’ duties. It also accuses the defendants of violating D.C. law by committing “bias-motivated acts of terrorism.”

In the filing for the injured officers, there are many pages listing specifically what each defendant did and the consequences. Full brief can be found HERE .. This is all to say, it's not a vague fact free BS filing like what Trump had his lawyers file to overturn the election. This one is tight and is crammed with links to evidence, statements made by the defendants and specifies how the officers were injured.

They are asking for a declaratory judgement that specific laws were broken. They are asking for injunctive relief. They are asking for compensatory damages. They are asking for punitive damages. They are asking for attorney's fees be covered.

In his filings to the court, Trump does not deny that he conspired and then led an insurrection and bloody coup. He claims he has presidential immunity because he believed he was acting in an official capacity when he conspired and then led the insurrection.

Trump already has been denied immunity in this matter on the grounds that he was acting as a candidate and not as president at the time he committed his crimes. Trump is appealing this ruling. I have not heard one credible source agree with Trump's side. This has never happened before, so who knows what the outcome will be. But, really. Trump's case seems pretty thin.

@NYCBambu : The above are facts and irrefutable. Do not reply to this post. You are not the intended audience.
 
Last edited:

doublejj

Well-Known Member
Speaking of impeachments.

Trump used the same tactic during the second trial in the Senate that he's trying to use now.

This thing where he claims a president may commit any crime as long as he says he believed it was in the interest of the country.

First time it was used: Trump was impeached for abuse of office because he threatened to withhold US national defense funds from Ukraine and asked for a "favor" -- a personal political favor -- to investigate Hunter Biden, the son of the man who was running against him. Trump was impeached. That is a matter or record. In a trial in the Senate, Republican Senators defended Trump by saying it's OK because he believed it was in the national interest. No explanation WHY it was in the national interest -- holding back funds that were part of a national security funding bill for what exactly? Well his judges didn't ask. They just said Trump believed it was in the national interest, so it's all good with them. Never mind that it made no legal sense. It made political sense to the Republican Senators.

nuff said. The trial in the Senate was a political event, not a legal one. The trial proved nothing regarding guilt or innocence.

Now: A brief has been filed for a civil lawsuit brought by seven injured Capitol police who are suing Trump, Tarrio, and a host of others -- by name. The suit, filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, claims that Trump and his co-defendants violated the Ku Klux Klan of 1871, which protects against violence that interferes with Congress’ duties. It also accuses the defendants of violating D.C. law by committing “bias-motivated acts of terrorism.”

In the filing for the injured officers, there are many pages listing specially what each defendant did and the consequences. Full brief can be found HERE .. This is all to say, it's not a vague fact free BS filing like what Trump had his lawyers file to overturn the election. This one is tight and is crammed with links to evidence, statements made by the defendants and specifies how the officers were injured.

They are asking for a declaratory judgement that specific laws were broken. They are asking for injunctive relief. They are asking for compensatory damages. They are asking for punitive damages. They are asking for attorney's fees be covered.

In his filings to the court, Trump does not deny that he conspired and then led an insurrection and bloody coup. He claims he has presidential immunity because he believed he was acting in an official capacity when he conspired and then led the insurrection.

Trump already has been denied immunity in this matter on the grounds that he was acting as a candidate and not as president at the time he committed his crimes. Trump is appealing this ruling. I have not heard one credible source agree with Trump's side. This has never happened before, so who knows what the outcome will be. But, really. Trump's case seems pretty thin.

@NYCBambu : The above are facts and irrefutable. Do not reply to this post. You are not the intended audience.
Lock him up!......
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top