Renfro
Well-Known Member
So my buddy has been going to Amsterdam yearly for most of his life as he has family there. He was telling me that the weed there went to pot pardon the pun. He was saying that one of the coffee shop owners was telling him that they have inbred their lines too long and the genetics went bad. The coffee shop owner said that we have better weed now because of all years of underground growers cloning from clones. My buddy said he kept using the term monoculture. I thought that term referred to cannabis being the only crop in the grow not a single strain of cannabis or single phenotype, and without having been there I don't know what the guy was trying to communicate. My buddy is not a grower but he loves to smoke weed.
I am not sure if he is right about that being the reason their weed went downhill but it is plausible. I think that the genetic diversity would be at risk if cloning from a clone as the sole means preserving a strain but I do see how keeping the old pure deal around using cloning would be beneficial for back crossing your strain that has been perpetuated by seed, sort of bring it back up to spec lol.
I have always thought it important to keep the pure old school phenotypes around, cloning from a clone, to prevent any sort of issues from inbreeding. I don't believe in genetic degradation from cloning as I have run strains for over 7 years and I have a buddy that has run some over 20 years with no issues, he still has them. I also think if a genetic degradation happened, it would happen to one clone, not all of them and it would be noticed and tossed out. I think that inbreeding would be more likely to cause issues as the coffee shop owner from Amsterdam was saying.
What does everyone think about this issue?
Disclaimer: I am high, as was my buddy and most likely the coffee shop owner.
I am not sure if he is right about that being the reason their weed went downhill but it is plausible. I think that the genetic diversity would be at risk if cloning from a clone as the sole means preserving a strain but I do see how keeping the old pure deal around using cloning would be beneficial for back crossing your strain that has been perpetuated by seed, sort of bring it back up to spec lol.
I have always thought it important to keep the pure old school phenotypes around, cloning from a clone, to prevent any sort of issues from inbreeding. I don't believe in genetic degradation from cloning as I have run strains for over 7 years and I have a buddy that has run some over 20 years with no issues, he still has them. I also think if a genetic degradation happened, it would happen to one clone, not all of them and it would be noticed and tossed out. I think that inbreeding would be more likely to cause issues as the coffee shop owner from Amsterdam was saying.
What does everyone think about this issue?
Disclaimer: I am high, as was my buddy and most likely the coffee shop owner.